The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Reprod. Health
Sec. Andrology
Volume 7 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1523386
The Correlation Between Sperm DNA Methylation and DNA Damage: A Comparison of Comet and TUNEL
Provisionally accepted- Brigham Young University, Provo, United States
It has been suggested that DNA damage correlates with global DNA methylation patterns in the sperm methylome. To assess this relationship more comprehensively, we analyzed the relationship between sperm DNA damage (as measured by both the comet and TUNEL assays) and DNA methylation with CpG resolution data (EPIC array) in the largest publicly available sperm DNA methylation dataset. Samples were classified by DNA damage score, in both comet and TUNEL, and subgroups were produced from these based on the highest and lowest values for each assay. These subgroups were used to assess differential methylation, epigenetic age, and epigenetic instability as a function of DNA damage. Furthermore, we compared the TUNEL and comet measurements of damage and their correlations to DNA methylation alterations. A regional analysis of differential methylation revealed 3387 significantly altered regions between the high and low comet categories, and 23 regions between high and low DNA fragmentation index (DFI) values. Although a regression demonstrates comet and TUNEL scores have a positive relationship, we found that the comet assay seems to have a much better fit with methylation disruption. Methylation disturbance as predicted by the comet assay also showed a significant relationship to gene ontology pathways related to germline development. It is noteworthy however that high and low comet scores were of far higher magnitude than differences between high and low TUNEL scores. These findings suggest comet scores offer a more comprehensive picture of sperm cell abnormalities.
Keywords: DNA methyla(on, Comet, TUNEL, DNA Damage, Sperm DNA, Comet Assay, TUNEL assay
Received: 06 Nov 2024; Accepted: 04 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zimmerman and Jenkins. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hailey Elizabeth Zimmerman, Brigham Young University, Provo, United States
Tim Jenkins, Brigham Young University, Provo, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.