Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Reprod. Health
Sec. Assisted Reproduction
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1453697

Childhood growth of singletons conceived following intracytoplasmic sperm injection -Irrelevance of gonadotropin stimulation

Provisionally accepted
Mirja A. Minger Mirja A. Minger 1,2*Grit Sommer Grit Sommer 3,4,5Vera R. Mitter Vera R. Mitter 2,6Livia A. Purtschert Livia A. Purtschert 7Michael Von Wolff Michael Von Wolff 2Alexandra S. Kohl Schwartz Alexandra S. Kohl Schwartz 2,8*
  • 1 Department of General Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
  • 2 Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 3 Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Children’s Hospital Bern, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 4 Department of Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 5 Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 6 Division of Midwifery, Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 7 Department of Pulmonology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
  • 8 Department of Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecological Endocrinology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: In recent studies, singletons conceived after in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles had lower birth weight than spontaneously conceived singletons. The etiology of the impaired intrauterine growth is unclear, but insufficiency of placental function or possible epigenetic effects is discussed. Up to now, the growth of children born after unstimulated natural cycle ICSI (NC-ICSI) has never been studied. Material and Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective cohort study (2010-2017) including children (n = 139) born after NC-ICSI or conventional gonadotropin stimulated ICSI (c-ICSI) treatment. Growth parameters up to 24 months were collected. Standard deviation scores based on growth references were calculated. Results: The median birth weight in NC-ICSI children was 3.4kg (0.1 standard deviation score (SDS)) compared to 3.3kg (-0.3 SDS) in c-ICSI children (p=0.61). Median length at birth was 50cm in both groups (NC-ICSI (-0.5 SDS), c-ICSI children (-0.8 SDS), p=0.48). At age 24 months, median weight in NC-ICSI children was 12.2kg (0.3 SDS) versus 12.2kg (0.2 SDS) in c-ICSI children (p=0.82) and median length 87.5cm (0.1 SDS) versus 88.0cm (0.4 SDS) (p=0.43).We found no difference in growth between children conceived after stimulated and unstimulated ICSI. Growth parameters of both treatment groups did not differ from Swiss national growth references. One of the main limitations of our study was the small sample size (N=139) and the high drop-out rate of 49% (68/139).

    Keywords: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Natural cycle, Gonadotropin stimulation, Assisted Reproductive Technology, Birth Weight, Growth, head circumference

    Received: 23 Jun 2024; Accepted: 28 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Minger, Sommer, Mitter, Purtschert, Von Wolff and Kohl Schwartz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Mirja A. Minger, Department of General Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
    Alexandra S. Kohl Schwartz, Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.