Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Reprod. Health
Sec. Adolescent Reproductive Health and Well-being
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1329806
This article is part of the Research Topic Child Marriage – A Global Adolescent Development Problem: Is the World Ready to Eliminate It? View all 4 articles

Generational trends in education and marriage norms in rural India: Evidence from the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Geography, School of Physical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
  • 2 Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 3 University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
  • 4 Diabetes Unit, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction. Globally in 2024, 1 in 5 women aged 20-24 years worldwide had been married before the age of 18 years. One reason for this persistent prevalence of underage marriage may be the slow change in social norms relating to education levels and women's marriage age. However, we know little about how norms change, and whether they vary by socio-demographic characteristics. We aimed to investigate changes in social norms across generations in rural Maharashtra, India. Methods. To understand the status quo, we identified education levels and marriage ages typical of contemporary young adults in rural Maharashtra using the National Family Health Survey. To see if norms have shifted across generations, we analysed data on education and marriage age in 659 parentadolescent dyads from the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study (PMNS) in rural Maharashtra. To ascertain if norms might shift in the future, we investigated adolescents' aspirations for their future hypothetical children, and classified adolescents as wanting (a) their children to decide themselves, (b) more education and later marriage age, or (c) the status quo. We assessed whether these aspirations differed by socio-demographic characteristics. Results. Compared to the status quo and PMNS adults, PMNS adolescents had substantially more education, and girls were marrying slightly later. About 70% of the adolescents wanted their children to decide themselves their schooling. The remainder of both sexes wanted their children to have the same education as them (15 years). Only 10% of adolescent girls and 14% of boys wanted their child to decide their own marriage age. Most adolescents wanted a later marriage age for their children than their own experience. Lower educated and early married girls aspired for greater education for their children. More educated boys aspired for later marriage for their children. Discussion. Education norms have changed by a larger magnitude than marriage age norms. Adolescents are already attaining their education aspirations, but aspire for later marriage of their children, more so for their hypothetical sons than daughters. Since senior household members remain influential in marriage decisions, it may take time before adolescents' aspirations for their children become a new norm.

    Keywords: Education and marriage norms, Aspirations, adolescents, generational trends, Educational attainment, Marriage age, rural India

    Received: 29 Oct 2023; Accepted: 12 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Marphatia, Wells, Reid, Poullas, Bhalerao, Yajnik and Yajnik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Akanksha A Marphatia, Department of Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Geography, School of Physical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EN, England, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.