Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Reprod. Health
Sec. Gynecology
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1304749
This article is part of the Research Topic Environmental Impacts on Women’s Health Disparities and Reproductive Health: Advancing environmental health equity in clinical and public health practice View all 8 articles

Examining modification of the associations between air pollution and birth outcomes by neighborhood deprivation in a North Carolina birth cohort, 2011-2015

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
  • 2 Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States
  • 3 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, District of Columbia, United States
  • 4 Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • 5 Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Evidence from studies of air pollutants and birth outcomes suggests an association, but uncertainties around geographical variability and modifying factors remain. As neighborhood-level social characteristics are associated with birth outcomes, we assess whether neighborhood deprivation level is an effect measure modifier on the association between air pollution and birth outcomes in a cohort of births in North Carolina.Methods: Using birth certificate data, all North Carolina residential singleton live births from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 with gestational ages 20-44 weeks (n=566,799) were examined for birth defect diagnoses and preterm birth. Exposures were daily-average fine particulate matter (PM2.5), daily 8-hour maximum nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and daily 8-hour maximum ozone (O3) modeled concentrations and the modifier of interest was the neighborhood deprivation index (NDI). Linear binomial models were used to estimate the prevalence differences (PD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between ambient air pollution and birth defect diagnoses. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate risk differences (RD) and 95% CIs for air pollution and preterm birth. Models were stratified by neighborhood deprivation index group (low, medium or high) to assess potential modification by NDI.Results: Approximately 3.1% of the study population had at least one birth defect and 8.18% were born preterm. For preterm birth, associations with PM2.5 and O3 did not follow a conclusive pattern and there was no evidence of modification by NDI. The associations between NO2 and preterm birth were generally negative across exposure windows except for a positive association with NO2 and preterm birth for high NDI (RD: 34.70 (4.84, 64.56)) for entire pregnancy exposure. There was no evidence of associations between pollutants examined and birth defects.Conclusions: There may be differences in the association between NO2 exposure and preterm birth by NDI but we did not observe evidence of associations for birth defects. Our results support the public health protection afforded by reductions in air pollution, even in areas of neighborhood deprivation but future research conducted in areas with higher levels of air pollution and evaluating the potential for modification by neighborhood deprivation level would be informative.

    Keywords: Air Pollution, BIRTH OUTCOMES, neighborhood deprivation, modification, Preterm Birth, Birth defects

    Received: 29 Sep 2023; Accepted: 17 Jun 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cowan, Krajewski, Jimenez, Luben, Messer and Rappazzo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Kristen Rappazzo, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, 20004, District of Columbia, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.