- 1Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
- 2Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- 3Department of Pathology, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
- 4Directorate of Research and Department of Pathology, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda
- 5Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Weight Center, Department of Medicine-Division of Endocrinology-Neuroendocrine, Department of Pediatrics-Division of Endocrinology, Nutrition Obesity Research Center at Harvard (NORCH), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Introduction
The only manufacturing company of cabotegravir, ViiV Healthcare, has potentially altered the state of HIV treatment in the developing world by agreeing to voluntarily license the drug cabotegravir for generic production and distribution in all LICs and lower-middle LICs (1). Access advocates had been calling on ViiV Healthcare, which began selling the drug in the European Union in December 2020, to license the drug to generic manufacturers voluntarily. Yet, as of October 2022, only Zimbabwe has approved the drug for sale, with most countries citing the cost of the drug as the reason not to move forward with approval (2). The necessity for more equitable pricing is apparent, as the countries hardest hit by HIV in sub-Saharan Africa face a long wait to get the drug (3). ViiV has set the cost of treatment at 22,200 USD annually, but prices higher than 100 USD annually for generic oral PrEP are too high for many low and middle-income countries (LMICs) (2, 3).
Discussion
The new HIV medication, cabotegravir, has shown increased effectiveness at preventing infection than the standard method of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) (3). In particular, cabotegravir has shown increased effectiveness over oral daily tenofovir diphosphate plus emtricitabine (TDF-FTC) for HIV prevention in women (3). Experience with oral PrEP shows that many people find it challenging to take a pill daily, while others are reluctant because of HIV-related stigma (4). Taking long-acting injectable cabotegravir every 2 months can help overcome many of the objections users may have (5). Another issue with oral PrEP has been that even though demonstration projects were funded and started in the years following proof of efficacy, little coordination among funding and implementing agencies dragged out the incorporation of the drugs into high-quality programs (4). These insights from oral PrEP programs offers essential lessons for the delivery of cabotegravir for PrEP.
Despite the many potential benefits of implementing cabotegravir for PrEP, ViiV has been, according to some critics, slow to secure deals with generic manufacturers (6, 7). Calls to celebrate a changing tide in the pharmaceutical game are thus premature (1). Generics are still 4–5 years away, and until then, ViiV Healthcare will likely be the sole manufacturer of cabotegravir (1). There are other obstacles to providing the drug. HIV may develop resistance to cabotegravir in people already infected with HIV, and this resistance hampers current HIV treatments (2). Thus, time-consuming, and costly sensitive HIV tests are administered in the United States before approving the drug for each patient (2). International funding will be vital in making such tests available if regulators determine that these tests are needed. Furthermore, to avoid the issues with the global rollout of oral PrEP, demonstration projects need to be big and fast-acting to overcome people's hesitancy to ask for the drug (2). Central to combating stigma are increasing awareness, addressing misinformation or mistrust, and promoting effective use. Users also prefer to access PrEP in non-clinical settings, yet cabotegravir is injected in the buttocks, requiring clinical privacy (4). However, it is possible to have community-based drop-in centers offering comprehensive HIV prevention services (4). For cabotegravir to be game-changing, funds must be allocated to these supporting tasks. African LICs face increasing demand from their citizens to access HIV medication to accommodate the surges of cases (3). A stable population must require sustained ongoing use for a high-quality program to incorporate cabotegravir.
Conclusion
A major potential solution is to use the clout of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), other donors, and national ministries of health to negotiate a price and volume guarantee that ensures a sustainable supply until generics are registered and readily available in approximately 4–5 years. While the current infrastructure amassed through PEPFAR is being used for testing and treatment of HIV, PEPFAR has not made a real attempt to utilize its funds to acquire cabotegravir (6). In fact, in July 2022, PEPFAR's Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) began discussions to procure the drug as ViiV Healthcare has promised to drop the price in certain low-income countries (LICs) (6). PEPFAR funding, which has provided 3.8 billion dollars for HIV services, should be allocated for cabotegravir acquisition (8).
We urge other donors and national ministries of health to negotiate a price and volume guarantee that ensures a sustainable supply to existing programs (1). Since ViiV is committed to allowing cabotegravir to be replicated by generics manufacturers, PEPFAR can function as a stopgap until the existence of generics lowers the price. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) is attempting to find a way for PEPFAR to implement injectable cabotegravir (9). The solution lies in PEPFAR to combat HIV in LICs and help achieve HIV equity. African LICs would benefit from leveraging PEPFAR networks, resources, and facilities to acquire and distribute cabotegravir. LIC health ministries must work with PEPFAR and other donors to treat HIV with cabotegravir and use the funds accessible to PEPFAR to acquire cabotegravir to allow for future HIV independence in LICs.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
National Institutes of Health NIDDK P30 DK040561 and U24 DK132733 (FS).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Jenny Lei R. New Agreement to Boost Access to Long-Acting HIV Prevention Drug. Devex (28 July 2022). Available at: https://www.devex.com/news/sponsored/new-agreement-to-boost-access-to-long-acting-hiv-prevention-drug-103735
2. Green A. Long-Lasting HIV Prevention Drug Too Slow to Reach Africa, Activists Say. (2022). Available at: https://www.science.org/content/article/hiv-prevention-drugs-too-slow-reach-africa-activists-say (June 22, 2022).
3. Preventive HIV drug shows urgent need for transparency on pricing. Nature. (2022) 608(7922):239. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-02136-6. Available at: www.nature.com35945377
4. Lessons From Oral PrEP Programs And Their Implications for Next Generation Prevention. HIV Prevention and Market Manager (October 2021). Available at: https://www.prepwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/PrEP_LearningReportNov21.pdf
5. Jamieson L, Johnson LF, Nichols BE, Delany-Moretlwe S, Hosseinipour MC, Russell C, et al. Relative cost-effectiveness of long-acting injectable cabotegravir versus oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in South Africa based on the HPTN 083 and HPTN 084 trials: a modelled economic evaluation and threshold analysis. Lancet. (2022) 9(12):e857–67. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00251-X
6. PEPFAR Scientific Advisory Board Meeting on CAB LA and Recent Infection Monitoring. (June 7, 2022). Available at: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/PEPFAR-SAB-June-7-2022-Public-Overview.pdf
7. ViiV ‘Actively Negotiating’ Voluntary Licence for HIV Prevention Drug. Financial Times. (27 May 2022).
8. PEPFAR Technical Guidance in Context of HIV Pandemic. (August 18, 2021). Available at: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/08.18.21-PEPFAR-Technical-Guidance-During-COVID.pdf
9. WHO Recommends Long-Acting Cabotegravir for HIV Prevention. (July 28, 2022). Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-07-2022-who-recommends-long-acting-cabotegravir-for-hiv-prevention
Keywords: HIV, health equity, medicine, PEPFAR, HIV prevention
Citation: Hammond A, Rugwizangoga B and Stanford FC (2023) Leveraging PEPFAR for HIV drug equity. Front. Reprod. Health 5:1105645. doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1105645
Received: 2 December 2022; Accepted: 30 March 2023;
Published: 21 April 2023.
Edited by:
Mat Lowe, Society for the Study of Women's Health, GambiaReviewed by:
Arshad Altaf, WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, EgyptNicolette Naidoo, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, South Africa
Machiko Otani, National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID), Japan
William Acevedo, Hospital de Enfermedades Infecciosas Dr. Lucio Córdova, Chile
© 2023 Hammond, Rugwizangoga and Stanford. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fatima Cody Stanford fstanford@mgh.harvard.edu
†ORCID Fatima Cody Stanford orcid.org/0000-0003-4616-533X
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to HIV and STIs, a section of the journal Frontiers in Reproductive Health