The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
TECHNOLOGY AND CODE article
Front. Remote Sens.
Sec. Atmospheric Remote Sensing
Volume 5 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/frsen.2024.1360572
This article is part of the Research Topic Towards 2030: A Remote Sensing Perspective on Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 13 – Climate Action View all 6 articles
Forestry climate adaptation with HarvesterSeasons service - a gradient booting model to forecast Soil Water Index SWI from a comprehensive set of predictors in Destination Earth
Provisionally accepted- 1 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
- 2 Metsäteho Oy, Vantaa, Finland
Soil wetness forecasts on a local level are needed to ensure sustainable forestry operations during summer when the soil is neither frozen nor covered with snow. Training gradient boosting models has been successful in predicting satellite observation-based products into the future using Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) and Earth Observation (EO) climate data as inputs. The Copernicus Global Land Monitoring Service’s Soil Water Index (SWI) satellite-based observations from 2015 to 2023 at 10 000 locations in Europe were used as the predictand (target parameter) to train an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict soil wetness with XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) and LightGBM (Light Gradient Boosting Machine) implementations of gradient boosting algorithms. The locations were selected as a representative set of points from the Land Use/Cover Area Frame Survey (LUCAS) sites, which helped evaluate the characteristics of different locations used in fitting to represent diverse landscapes across Europe. Over 40 predictors, mainly from ERA5-Land reanalysis, were used in the final model. Over 70 predictors were tested, including the climatology of EO based predictors like SWI and Leaf-Area Index (LAI). The final model achieved a mean absolute error of 5.5% and a root mean square error of 7% for a variable values ranging from 0-100%, an accuracy sufficient for forestry use case. To further validate the model, SWI prediction was made using the 215-day seasonal forecast ensemble from April 2021, consisting of 51 members. With this, the quality could also be demonstrated in the way our forestry climate service (HarvesterSeasons.com) would use the forecasts. As soil wetness is not changing as rapidly as many weather parameters, the forecast skill appears to last longer for it than for the weather variables. The code for the machine learning work and the predictions are available as open source at https://github.com/fmidev/ml-harvesterseasons (see README-SWI2). The training data and ML models are at https://destine.data.lit.fmi.fi/soilwater/. All data used for predictions are accessible from the SmartMet server at https://desm.harvesterseasons.com/grid-gui and the work flow is available in the script https://github.com/fmidev/harvesterseasons-smartmet/blob/master/bin/get-seasonal.sh Everything is made available for ensuring reproducibility. One will need to register and use their own https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu credentials for doing so.
Keywords: soil wetness1, forestry operations2, seasonal forecast quality3, XGBoost (Extreme gradient boosting)4, lightGBM5, ERA5-Land6, Soil Water Index (SWI)7, SoilGrids8
Received: 23 Dec 2023; Accepted: 13 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Strahlendorff, Kröger, Prakasam, Kosmale, Moisander, Ovaskainen and Poikela. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Mikko Strahlendorff, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Anni Kröger, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.