ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Rehabil. Sci.

Sec. Disability, Rehabilitation, and Inclusion

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1576357

The Symbolic Intersecting Ableism and Racism Scale (SIARS)

Provisionally accepted
  • CQL | The Council on Quality and Leadership, Towson, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Intersectionality recognizes and maps the ways oppressions interact and intersect for multiply marginalized people. This framework is a pushing back against the historical approach to discrimination that has taken a 'single-axis' view of discrimination, focusing on one single type of oppression, even for people with multiple identities. Little attention has been drawn to intersectionality when it comes to disability, especially related to disability and race. Objective. In recognition of the intersectional nature of ableism and racism, the aim of this study was to develop and validate the Symbolic Intersecting Ableism and Racism Scale (SIARS). Materials and Methods. We piloted the SIARS with 512 people (July-October 2024) and conducted an exploratory factor analysis to examine the underlying structure of the SIARS. Results. The SIARS has adequate validity and reliability. Our findings suggest the SIARS is comprised of a complex combination of a denial of continuing discrimination, individualism, and empathy. The findings also indicated many points of contention with the single-axis symbolic ableism scale measure, which examines disability only, further reinforcing the need to measure and attend to intersectionality.Without doing so, we will never truly be able to dismantle oppression and discrimination, including the ableism disabled people face.

Keywords: Ableism, Racism, Disability, race, Intersectionality, explicit attitudes

Received: 13 Feb 2025; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Friedman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Carli Friedman, CQL | The Council on Quality and Leadership, Towson, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more