The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
REVIEW article
Front. Rehabil. Sci.
Sec. Rehabilitation in Neurological Conditions
Volume 6 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1539887
Does prism adaptation treatment reduce spatial neglect and improve function?
Provisionally accepted- 1 Kessler Foundation, West Orange, New Jersey, United States
- 2 Department of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, United States
- 3 School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- 4 Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- 5 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
The potential of using prism adaptation for treating spatial neglect (SN) was questioned when recent meta-analyses found inconsistent evidence. However, analyses of clinical datasets support the use of prism adaptation treatment (PAT) in reducing SN and improving function. The main objective of this review is to evaluate the current state of the evidence of PAT therapeutic effects, identify knowledge gaps, and make suggestions to guide further research and to support clinical decision making. We used the framework of the NIH Stage Model for Behavioral Intervention Development that provides guidance on best practices for developing effective behavioral interventions that can be implemented in real world settings. This Model emphasizes the interplay between mechanisms underlying therapeutic effects (‘who’ should receive the treatment and ‘how’ best does it work?) and considerations of adaptability and feasibility in real-world settings. The present critical review led to the following conclusion: Use of the NIH Stage Model reveals the heterogeneity of PAT studies and challenges in advancing PAT as an effective intervention. Key mechanisms such as prism strength, treatment intensity, arm visibility and activities during treatment, and evaluation methods lack consensus. Therefore, it is essential that clinical research teams continue to collect evidence to determine critical mechanisms and the optimal protocol. Further research identifying the optimal PAT protocol is needed before another meta-analysis on PAT’s clinical efficacy should be conducted again.
Keywords: efficacy, effectiveness, behavioral intervention, Therapeutic treatment, Rehabilitative therapy, Spatial exploration, Sensorimotor adaptation, Unilateral spatial neglect
Received: 05 Dec 2024; Accepted: 21 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Hreha, MacPhee, Salter and Eskes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Peii Chen, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, 07052, New Jersey, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.