
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
METHODS article
Front. Rehabil. Sci.
Sec. Interventions for Rehabilitation
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1537890
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe neurological disorder resulting in loss of movement and altered sensation with lifelong impacts on health, function, and social integration. Multidisciplinary SCI rehabilitation primarily focuses on enhancing function and independence while simultaneously managing secondary health conditions and providing psychosocial support. Therefore, a major goal in SCI rehabilitation should be strengthening patients' capacity to cope with and adjust to challenges they encounter. Using a mixed methods design, the primary aim of this study is to integrate psychosocial guidelines that promote psychological adjustment into SCI rehabilitation, and second, to evaluate facilitators and barriers to their successful implementation.To determine perceived depth of knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes about psychosocial care, and usage of psychosocial guidelines, healthcare workers in the three specialist SCI services in New South Wales, Australia will be invited to complete a baseline survey. Following the survey, semi-structured one-to-one interviews and focus groups will be conducted with health professionals representing different health disciplines to understand the context and generate ideas about how best to integrate these guidelines into clinical practice.Based on the surveys, interviews, and focus groups, an implementation intervention employing educational strategies, structural, and nudge (behavioural change) approaches will be designed and implemented over a period of 18-months to facilitate integration of the guidelines into the SCI services. A post-intervention survey with healthcare workers will then be conducted. Focus groups from each Unit, with representation across the different health professions, will also be conducted to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing the guidelines. Success of implementation will be determined by analyzing any shifts in perceived knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour of staff and cultural/structural processes observed through comparing baseline and post-intervention qualitative and quantitative data.To capture lived experience insight, 15 people with SCI currently undergoing rehabilitation will be interviewed.Discussion: This study will establish the success of implementing psychosocial guidelines into three specialist SCI services. It is hypothesized that constructive changes will occur in the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour of the SCI Unit health professionals, leading to improved psychosocial practices and patient outcomes that will strengthen person-centred healthcare in SCI rehabilitation.
Keywords: psychosocial guidelines, adjustment, implementation, patient-centred care, Behaviour change techniques, spinal cord injury, Facilitators, barriers
Received: 02 Dec 2024; Accepted: 19 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 McBain, Sarandrea, Pozzato, Arora, Myles, Bourke, Tran, Cameron, Middleton and Craig. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Candice McBain, John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2050, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.