A systematic review: impact of dry needling, isometric, and eccentric exercises on pain and function in individuals with patellar tendinopathy

This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing body of evidence and provide a comprehensive analysis of the effects of dry needling, isometric, and eccentric exercises on pain severity and functional impairment in individuals diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy. The review was conducted in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, PEDro, and Google Scholar were systematically searched for relevant literature from 2010 to August 2022. The therapeutic effects of dry needling, isometric exercises, and eccentric exercises on patellar tendinopathy were critically assessed. The risk of bias was determined using the McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies, while the level of evidence and recommendation grades were assigned based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines.

The primary outcomes of interest were pain severity and functional impairment, particularly among elite volleyball and basketball athletes suffering from patellar tendinopathy. The systematic review incorporated nine clinical trials, including two on dry needling, four on isometric exercises, and three on eccentric exercises. The quality of the included studies ranged from 70% to 93%, as evaluated through the McMaster Critical Review Form. The two dry needling trials were deemed to be of high quality (93%), while the four isometric trials were classified as moderate quality (75%). Similarly, the three trials on eccentric exercises were rated at an average of 78%, indicating moderate quality.

Of the nine trials, six were randomized controlled trials, with a 1B level of evidence (Grade A recommendation), while three trials, comprising two cross-over trials and one controlled clinical trial, were categorized as 2B evidence (Grade B recommendation). The findings from this review suggest that dry needling and eccentric exercises are more effective for long-term pain reduction and improvement in knee function, whereas isometric exercises appear to provide greater benefit for short-term pain relief, particularly during athletic activity. Although physical therapy-based interventions show promise for sustained management, the limited data underscores the need for further high-quality research in this domain.

Systematic Review Registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42022360057, identifier (CRD42022360057).

Introduction/background

Patellar tendinopathy, commonly known as “jumper's knee,” is a chronic overuse injury affecting the patellar tendon. This condition is particularly prevalent among athletes involved in sports requiring repetitive jumping and landing, such as volleyball and basketball. Understanding the etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation of patellar tendinopathy is crucial for developing effective treatment strategies (1, 2).

Patellar tendinopathy typically results from repetitive mechanical overload on the patellar tendon. This overload leads to microtrauma, which, when coupled with insufficient recovery time, initiates a degenerative process within the tendon. The pathophysiology involves several stages: initial inflammatory response, failed healing response with increased production of type III collagen, neovascularization and nerve ingrowth, disorganization of collagen fibres, and eventual tendon degeneration and weakening. These changes result in pain, reduced function, and decreased athletic performance (3).

Patients with patellar tendinopathy typically present with localized pain at the inferior pole of the patella, pain exacerbated by activities involving knee extension, particularly jumping and landing, a gradual onset of symptoms that often worsen over time, stiffness after periods of inactivity, and decreased strength and performance in sport-specific activities. Diagnosis is primarily clinical, often supported by imaging techniques such as ultrasound or MRI to assess the extent of tendon degeneration (4).

Treatment for patellar tendinopathy can be broadly categorized into conservative and surgical approaches. Conservative treatments include rest and activity modification, physical therapy (which includes eccentric exercises, isometric exercises, and dry needling), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, and corticosteroid injections (though these are controversial due to potential long-term negative effects) (5, 6). Surgical options include arthroscopic debridement, open tenotomy and repair, and ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy. While surgical interventions can be effective in recalcitrant cases, they are typically considered only after conservative measures have failed (7).

Among the available treatment options, physical therapy-based interventions offer several distinct advantages for athletes with patellar tendinopathy. These advantages include their non-invasive nature, as physical therapy treatments do not require incisions or lengthy recovery periods, minimizing the risk of complications and allowing for a quicker return to sport. Many physical therapy protocols also allow athletes to continue modified training regimens, maintaining overall fitness and reducing deconditioning during the rehabilitation process (8). Physical therapy carries a significantly lower risk of complications compared to surgical interventions or injections, which can lead to adverse effects such as infection, scarring, or tendon weakening. Additionally, physical therapy is typically more cost-effective compared to surgical procedures or repeated injection therapies, making it a more accessible option for many athletes (9).

Physical therapy interventions can also identify and correct biomechanical factors contributing to tendon overload, potentially reducing the risk of recurrence. Furthermore, targeted exercises and manual therapies can stimulate tendon remodelling and improve load tolerance, addressing the underlying pathophysiology of the condition (10). Physical therapy protocols can be easily modified to suit an athlete's specific needs, sport demands, and stage of rehabilitation, offering versatility and individualization. Given these advantages, there is growing interest in optimizing physical therapy-based treatments for patellar tendinopathy. This systematic review focuses on three commonly employed interventions: dry needling, isometric exercises, and eccentric exercises. By critically evaluating the current evidence, we aim to provide insights into the most effective physical therapy strategies for managing this challenging condition in athletes (11, 12).

The primary purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the effects of dry needling, isometric exercises, and eccentric exercises on pain severity and functional impairment in individuals diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy. The primary outcome measure is the reduction in pain severity, assessed through validated tools such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The secondary outcome measure is the improvement in functional capacity, evaluated using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) questionnaire, which measures symptoms, physical function, and sports-related performance. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of these interventions in treating patellar tendinopathy, particularly among athletes.

Methods

Detailed Description of Physical Therapy Treatments for Patellar Tendinopathy.

Dry needling

Dry needling for patellar tendinopathy involves inserting thin, solid filament needles into specific points of the patellar tendon. The procedure typically follows these steps: the patient lies supine with the knee slightly flexed. The practitioner then palpates the patellar tendon to identify areas of tenderness or nodules. Using aseptic technique, the skin is cleaned with an antiseptic solution. A sterile, single-use needle is inserted into the identified area, often guided by ultrasound for precision. The needle may be rotated or moved up and down to elicit a local twitch response. The needle is left in place for a short period, usually between 10 and 30 s, before removal. This process may be repeated at different points along the tendon (13).

Dry needling is believed to work through several mechanisms. Mechanically, the needle may disrupt adhesions or scar tissue within the tendon. Biochemically, needle insertion may stimulate the release of endogenous opioids and other substances that modulate pain. Neuromuscularly, it may alter muscle tone and trigger point activity in the surrounding musculature. Additionally, the microtrauma caused by needling may promote local vasodilation and increase blood flow to the tendon. Physiologically, dry needling is thought to stimulate a localized healing response by creating controlled microtrauma. This may initiate a cascade of cellular events, such as the release of growth factors and recruitment of fibroblasts, potentially promoting tendon remodelling and repair (14).

Isometric exercises

Isometric exercises for patellar tendinopathy typically involve sustained contractions of the quadriceps muscle without joint movement. A common protocol for these exercises includes positioning the patient seated with the knee flexed at a specific angle, often 60°. The patient uses a leg extension machine or resistance band to perform a maximal or submaximal quadriceps contraction against immovable resistance. The contractions are held for 30–45 s, with 5 sets commonly performed. This protocol is often done daily or several times per week. Isometric exercises may activate descending pain inhibitory systems, reduce cortical inhibition to improve motor output, stimulate tendon remodelling through controlled loading, and improve quadriceps activation and control (6).

The rationale behind isometric exercises is that they provide a means of loading the tendon in a controlled manner, potentially stimulating adaptive responses without creating excessive shear forces. The sustained nature of the contraction may have specific effects on pain processing pathways, offering both immediate and longer-term pain relief.

Eccentric exercises

Eccentric exercises for patellar tendinopathy focus on the lengthening phase of muscle contraction. A typical protocol involves standing on a 25° decline board to increase the load on the patellar tendon. The patient performs a single-leg squat, lowering the body slowly over 3–4 s. To return to the starting position, the patient uses the non-affected leg or arms, minimizing concentric load on the affected side. The typical protocol involves 3 sets of 15 repetitions. As tolerance improves, weight is added, such as a backpack with weights. These exercises are often performed twice daily, 7 days a week (11).

Eccentric loading during these exercises may stimulate collagen synthesis and improve tendon structure. Additionally, it may increase the length and compliance of the muscle-tendon unit, reduce pain sensitivity in the tendon through progressive loading, and improve motor control and coordination. The physiological rationale for eccentric exercises is that they subject the tendon to high loads during the lengthening phase, which more closely mimics the demands placed on the tendon during jumping activities. This controlled overload may stimulate adaptive responses in the tendon, improving its capacity to withstand and transmit force (8).

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements (15, 16) were used as the article's guidelines.

Search strategy

To ensure a comprehensive review of the literature, F.S. and D.M. search strategy in response to feedback. The initial search included studies published between 2010 and 2022. However, recognizing that physical therapy treatments for patellar tendinopathy have been studied for several decades, we extended our search to include studies published from 1990 onwards. This expanded timeframe allows to capture the evolution of these treatments and provide a more comprehensive overview of the existing evidence.

F.S. and D.M. conducted a thorough search of the following electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search was last updated on September 2022.

F.S. and D.M. used the following search terms and their combinations:

For the condition: “patellar tendinopathy” OR “jumper's knee” OR “patellar tendinitis” OR “patellar tendinosis”

For treatments: “dry needling” OR “acupuncture” OR “isometric exercise” OR “isometric training” OR “eccentric exercise” OR “eccentric training” OR “physical therapy” OR “physiotherapy” OR “rehabilitation”

F.S. and D.M. also used database-specific controlled vocabulary (e.g., MeSH terms in PubMed) to enhance the sensitivity of our search.

In addition to electronic database searches, A.S. and D.M. manually screened the reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews to identify any additional eligible studies. A.S. and D.M. also searched clinical trial registries, including clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, to identify ongoing or recently completed studies that may not yet be published.

To further ensure comprehensiveness, F.S. and A.S. contacted experts in the field of sports medicine and physical therapy to inquire about any unpublished or ongoing studies relevant to our review.

Eligibility criteria

The eligibility criteria for this systematic review were defined using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework (17).

Inclusion criteria

The following articles were considered eligible for inclusion in this review based on the outlined criteria:

1. Type of Study: The review focused on randomized controlled trials (single- or double-blinded) or cross-over trials. Studies were considered regardless of whether they were open-access or paid, provided they contained published evidence relevant to the topic.

2. Type of Participant: Participants included in the studies had to have a clinically or imaging-confirmed diagnosis of patellar tendinopathy, with a history of knee pain localized to the patellar tendon for a minimum duration of three months, affecting one or both knees. Eligible participants were required to be at least 16 years of age, with consistent follow-up, and to have practiced volleyball or basketball at least three times per week.

3. Type of Intervention: Studies investigating physiotherapy interventions involving isometric exercises, eccentric exercises, or dry needling were included. Physical therapy exercises or adjunct procedures were also considered, as these conservative treatment strategies are frequently employed in conjunction with the primary interventions.

4. Comparison/Control: Where applicable, studies that included a comparison or control group were included, and the details of these comparisons were documented according to the study protocols.

5. Type of Outcome Measure: The primary outcome measure of interest was the assessment of pain severity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (18) or Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Both tools rate pain on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 representing the worst possible pain. The secondary outcome of interest was functional impairment, which was evaluated using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) questionnaire. The VISA-P measures symptoms, function, and athletic ability, with scores ranging from 0 (severe impairment) to 100 (fully active and symptom-free). These measures were used to assess pain levels and functional capabilities in individuals with patellar tendinopathy (19, 20).

Exclusion criteria

Studies comparing various types of therapies, such as surgical interventions or injection-based treatments, were excluded from this review. Additionally, research not published in English, lacking full-text availability, or not involving patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy was omitted. Studies involving participants with cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, septic arthritis, or other inflammatory arthritic conditions were excluded to avoid confounding factors from other chronic diseases. Furthermore, observational studies, recommendations, narrative reviews, surveys, and expert commentaries were not included (21, 22).

Data collection and analysis

Selection of studies

Two independent reviewers (D.M. and A.S.) screened the titles and abstracts of identified articles to determine their eligibility for inclusion in the review. Full texts of potentially relevant studies were then obtained for further evaluation. The reviewers remained blinded to the authors, institutions, publication sources, and research outcomes during the selection process. Each manuscript was independently reviewed and assessed by an expert panel. Any disagreements between the reviewers regarding study inclusion were resolved through discussion.

Data extraction

Two independent reviewers (F.S. and D.M.) extracted relevant data from the included studies. Information such as author, year of publication, journal, inclusion criteria, participant demographics (age, sex), duration of treatment, rehabilitation plans, outcome measures, and risk of bias were recorded. A standardized Microsoft Excel spreadsheet specifically designed for clinical trials was used to systematically collect the data. In cases of ambiguous or missing data, attempts were made to contact the authors of the respective studies for clarification. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with the authors.

Evaluation of methodological quality

The methodological quality of each included trial was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, based on the Delphi list. The PEDro scale consists of 11 items, including eligibility criteria, random allocation, allocation concealment, baseline group comparability, blinding of subjects, therapists, and assessors, use of appropriate timing protocols, intention-to-treat analysis, between-group comparisons, point estimates, and data variability. The scale ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater methodological rigor. For this review, studies scoring less than five were classified as low-quality evidence, while those scoring five or higher were considered high-quality evidence.

Risk of bias assessment

The McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies was used to assess the risk of bias across the included studies. This tool provides a structured approach to evaluating studies, with responses of “Yes,” “No,” or “Not addressed,” which are then scored based on the criteria met. This tool was selected for its widespread use, availability, and ability to assess a variety of study designs. Two reviewers independently evaluated the level of evidence and grade of recommendation for each study, utilizing the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine grading system (23). Disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through the involvement of a third reviewer, though this was not required in practice.

Summary measures

For continuous data, results were reported as mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals and p-values. For categorical data, such as VAS or VISA scores, percentage changes, 95% confidence intervals, p-values, and chi-squared values were provided when available.

Data synthesis

Attempts were made to pool data for meta-analysis; however, due to the heterogeneity of the included studies and the limited number of trials, this was not feasible. Additionally, time constraints precluded the completion of a meta-analysis. Conclusions were instead derived from the best available evidence synthesis, which took into account the methodological quality of the studies, their findings, and the consistency of the results across trials. This study was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42022360057).

Study selection

An initial search yielded 1,150 articles for potential inclusion. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 1,106 studies were excluded, as shown in Figure 1. The full texts of the remaining 44 studies were evaluated for eligibility, leading to the exclusion of 35 articles. The reasons for exclusion were as follows: 15 articles were reviews, 6 were non-randomized studies, 3 described study protocols, 7 focused on different topics, and 4 were commentaries. Ultimately, 9 articles (10–12, 24–29) were included in the systematic review to assess the therapeutic effectiveness of dry needling, isometric exercises, and eccentric exercises for patellar tendinopathy.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Flowchart of included clinical trials and study selection.

Characteristics of included studies

Table 1 summarizes the essential characteristics of the nine included clinical trials (10–12, 24–29). Two independent reviewers extracted data from each study. All included studies were published in English and focused on non-surgical interventions for treating patellar tendinopathy in athletes. In total, 186 participants were included in the eccentric exercise programs (10, 11, 29), 69 participants in dry needling programs (12, 25), and 75 participants in isometric exercise programs (24, 26–28). All trials involved participants aged between 16 and 48 years, with confirmed diagnoses of patellar tendinopathy. Each study assessed two primary outcomes: pain severity and functional improvement.

Table 1

Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.

Based on Sackett's level of evidence, six of the nine studies achieved a Level Ⅱ ranking (10–12, 25–27), while the remaining three received a Level Ⅲ ranking (24, 28, 29), as indicated in Table 1. Most participants were regular athletes, with basketball and volleyball being the most studied sports. The follow-up periods varied among the studies. Three trials followed participants for up to 24 weeks (10, 11, 29), while others followed up at shorter intervals, such as immediately post-intervention and 45 min later (24, 26, 28). One study had a follow-up period of 26 weeks (25), another 22 weeks (12), and one only 4 weeks (27).

Methodological quality

The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the PEDro scale, and the results are summarized in Table 2. One of the nine studies had already been assessed using the PEDro criteria in previous research (25). Two independent reviewers assessed the remaining eight studies (10–12, 24, 26–29). All studies received a score greater than 5 on the PEDro scale, indicating high methodological quality. Specifically, five studies received a score of 8 (10, 12, 24–26), while the other four received a score of 7 (11, 27–29). Overall, all nine studies were considered high-quality research and demonstrated effective interventions for reducing pain and improving functional impairment associated with patellar tendinopathy.

Table 2

Table 2. Quality assessment according to PEDro scale.

Assessment of risk of bias and level of evidence

We used the McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies to enhance the quality of our systematic review Table 3. The overall average score ranged from 70% to 93%. Four clinical trials showed moderate quality (at least 75% of an average), three studies demonstrated (78%), and two studies were of excellent quality (at least 93%). As a result, the included studies generally provided evidence of moderate to high quality. Nine studies were included in this review Table 4. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine was taken into consideration while determining the level of evidence for each clinical study in Table 5. In terms of the level of evidence and grade of recommendation Table 6 (30), six studies were level 1B (individual randomized controlled trials with narrow confidence intervals), with the recommendation of grade A (strong recommendation that is expected to be followed, unless there are compelling reasons to deviate from the recommendation in an individual) (10–12, 25–27). Three studies were 2B (Individual cohort study (including low quality Randomized Controlled Trial), as two were single-blinded randomized cross-over trials (28, 31) and one was a controlled clinical trial (29), with recommendation of grade B (satisfactory recommendation), but these studies were still appropriate in evaluating the effects of the intervention.

Table 3

Table 3. Summary of Key study details and methodological components.

Table 4

Table 4. Level of evidence and grade of recommendation.

Table 5

Table 5. Levels of evidence (Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine) (30).

Table 6

Table 6. Grades of recommendation (Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine) (30).

Results of individual studies

The process of study selection is illustrated in Figure 1.

An initial search yielded 1,150 articles for potential inclusion. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 1,106 studies were excluded. The full texts of the remaining 44 studies were evaluated for eligibility, leading to the exclusion of 35 articles. The reasons for exclusion were as follows: 15 articles were reviews, 6 were non-randomized studies, 3 described study protocols, 7 focused on different topics, and 4 were commentaries. Ultimately, 9 articles (10–12, 24–29) were included in the systematic review to assess the therapeutic effectiveness of dry needling, isometric exercises, and eccentric exercises for patellar tendinopathy.

Tables 7 and 8 summarizes the conclusions of all trials, comparing the effects on pain severity and functional impairment.

Table 7

Table 7. Risk of bias in individual studies.

Table 8

Table 8. Results of studies included in subgroup analysis.

Dry needling

Two clinical trials, Dragoo et al. (2014) and Lopez et al. (2021), evaluated the efficacy of dry needling under ultrasound guidance to treat pain and functional limitations caused by patellar tendinopathy (12, 25).

• In Dragoo et al. (2014), a radiologist used an ultrasound probe to deliver 10 insertions into the patellar tendon region over a series of sessions (25). The results demonstrated significant improvement in pain, with a reduction in the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) score over 26 weeks (p = 0.02), and a notable recovery in function measured by the VISA (Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment) score (p = 0.0001).

• Lopez et al. (2021) conducted a clinical trial involving the insertion of 3 needles across four sessions, resulting in 12 total insertions (12). The trial revealed a significant decrease in VAS pain severity by 22 weeks (p ≤ 0.05), with a corresponding improvement in functional ability as reflected in the VISA score.

Isometric exercises

Four studies—Rio et al. (2015), Rio et al. (2016), Van Ark et al. (2016), and Holden et al. (2019)—examined the efficacy of isometric exercises in athletes with patellar tendinopathy, particularly those engaged in basketball or volleyball during the season (24, 26–28).

• Rio et al. (2015) implemented isometric exercises using either a Biodex or leg extension machine. Participants performed the exercises at 70%–80% of their maximum voluntary contraction at 60° knee flexion, holding for five sets of 45 s. The study reported significant pain reduction in the isometric group immediately after the intervention (p = 0.004) and maintained this reduction even 45 min post-intervention, while the isotonic group did not experience the same sustained pain relief (32).

• Rio et al. (2016) followed a similar protocol, showing that while both the isometric and isotonic exercise groups experienced a reduction in pain, the isometric group saw a greater reduction in NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) pain scores (1.8 ± 0.39) compared to the isotonic group (0.9 ± 0.25) (26).

• Van Ark et al. (2016) reported a modest reduction in pain during a 4-week intervention (27). Both Rio et al. (2016) and Van Ark et al. (2016) evaluated functional improvement and found that the VISA score significantly improved in both groups after 4 weeks, but with no significant difference between the isometric and isotonic groups.

• Holden et al. (2019) concluded that isometric exercises showed no substantial change in either pain severity or functional impairment by the end of the intervention (28).

Eccentric exercise

Three clinical trials—Dimitrios et al. (2012), Breda et al. (2022), and Breda et al. (2021)—evaluated the effectiveness of Eccentric Exercise Therapy (EET) for managing patellar tendinopathy (10, 11, 29).

• Dimitrios et al. (2012) compared eccentric training to eccentric training combined with static stretching (29). The eccentric exercise method primarily involved performing 25° decline squats, consisting of three sets of 15 repetitions, where the concentric phase was executed with the non-affected leg and the eccentric phase was performed with the affected leg. The study reported a significant increase in the VISA-P (Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Patella) score at 4 weeks (p < 0.0005), indicating a reduction in pain and an enhancement in function towards the end of the treatment.

• Breda et al. (2022) and Breda et al. (2021) compared EET to Progressive Tendon-Loading Exercise (PTLE). PTLE involved four stages:

○ Stage 1: Daily isometric exercises, including leg extensions with 5 repetitions of 45 s at mid-range (60° knee flexion), held at 70% of maximum voluntary contraction.

○ Stage 2: The isometric exercises from Stage 1 were performed on alternate days, combined with new isotonic exercises on the second day. The isotonic exercises included leg extensions with 4 sets of 15 repetitions between 10° and 60° of knee flexion, which progressively increased.

○ Stage 3: Plyometric exercises, such as running.

○ Stage 4: Sports-specific exercises, tailored for activities such as basketball and volleyball.

Both studies assessed pain and functional improvement using the VISA-P questionnaire. Breda et al. (2022) observed improvement in clinical outcomes at 12 weeks (p = 0.02), while Breda et al. (2021) reported similar findings at 24 weeks (p < 0.001). However, both studies concluded that PTLE was superior to EET alone by the end of the treatment period.

Discussion

Patellar tendinopathy is a common injury among recreational volleyball and basketball players. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence regarding the effects of dry needling, isometric exercises, and eccentric exercises on pain and function in individuals with patellar tendinopathy. To our knowledge, this is the first review focusing specifically on the clinical implications of physiotherapy-based interventions for managing this condition in athletes. All three interventions demonstrated successful outcomes in addressing pain and functional impairment.

The findings suggest that the results from isometric exercises and dry needling can be reliably used to guide clinical practice. In most clinical settings, the evidence from eccentric exercise can also be trusted according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence. Notably, two studies (Dragoo et al., 2014) and (Lopez et al., 2021) indicated that a therapeutic regimen combining exercise with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection alongside dry needling is more effective than exercise and ultrasound-guided dry needling alone. Similarly, the results of three studies evaluating eccentric exercises (Dimitrios et al., 2012; Breda et al., 2022; Breda et al., 2021) showed that eccentric training combined with static stretching is more beneficial than eccentric training alone, and that progressive tendon-loading exercises (PTLE) are superior to eccentric exercise training alone.

The McMaster tool's evaluation revealed that dry needling studies had a high quality, with an average score of 93%, while eccentric exercise programs scored an average of 78%. Isometric exercise studies had an average score of 75%, influenced by one moderate-quality study (Holden et al., 2019); however, overall, isometric studies yielded good results. A notable limitation of the current research is that many studies failed to specify sample sizes, and several did not adequately address whether contamination within control groups was avoided. These aspects present opportunities for improvement in future research.

Given that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard in medical research, the methodological quality of the nine trials included in this review was assessed using the PEDro scale. All studies scored above the cut-off of 5, with five trials achieving a score of 8/10 and four studies scoring 7/10.

Considering that patellar tendinopathy significantly impacts athletes' performance, treatment plans must prioritize pain control and functional enhancement, particularly during competitive seasons. One RCT indicated that isometric exercise was superior to both dry needling and eccentric exercise for alleviating acute pain. Specifically, Rio et al. (2015) demonstrated rapid analgesia in patients with patellar tendinopathy, evident just 45 min post-intervention. While dry needling also showed beneficial outcomes (Dragoo et al., 2014), pain relief was primarily observed at 26 weeks. Despite the extensive evidence supporting eccentric exercise programs, Breda et al. (2022) found that progressive tendon-loading exercise (PTLE) was more effective than eccentric exercise alone. Future research should compare the effects of different exercise modalities on pain in both short- and long-term contexts.

A previous review by Lim et al. (2018) suggested that isometric exercises are more effective for short-term pain relief compared to heavy slow resistance (HSR) or eccentric exercises. Similarly, a study by Challoumas (2021) concluded that isometric loading is effective for immediate pain relief, advocating for eccentric exercises as a first-line treatment for managing patellar tendinopathy. Additionally, this review found that dry needling demonstrated significant long-term effects, as it promotes analgesia and exerts mechanical effects on the tendon. These effects contribute to enhanced tensile strength and improved outcomes over time.

This systematic review rigorously adhered to robust methodologies to minimize bias. Firstly, the review process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA) guidelines, ensuring external validity. Secondly, the studies were appraised based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence and the PEDro scale, focusing on methodological quality and design applicability. Thirdly, subgroup evaluations were performed to assess clinical heterogeneity for result synthesis. Ultimately, nine clinical trials were analyzed to derive the review's outcomes.

A limitation of this systematic review is the inability to directly evaluate the effectiveness of isometric, eccentric, and dry needling interventions in isolation; thus, it remains unclear which treatment may be more effective for patellar tendinopathy. Furthermore, due to a scarcity of available evidence, this review relied on a limited number of free online publications rather than comprehensive access to all pertinent literature. Time constraints also precluded the possibility of conducting a meta-analysis, which could have provided deeper insights into the findings. Consequently, more thorough research is needed to clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of these interventions in treating patellar tendinopathy. Future studies should explore a broader range of physical therapy-based exercises and interventions to yield meaningful and reliable outcome measures.

Conclusions

This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of dry needling, isometric exercises, and eccentric exercises for managing pain and functional impairment in individuals with patellar tendinopathy. While dry needling and eccentric exercises demonstrated significant improvements in long-term pain reduction and function, especially in high-quality trials, the evidence remains limited by the small number of studies and varied methodologies. Isometric exercises showed short-term benefits in pain relief, particularly during athletic performance, but did not consistently improve long-term function across studies. Although these findings suggest that physical therapy-based interventions hold promise for treating patellar tendinopathy, the heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures limits the ability to make definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of one treatment over another. More rigorous, high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these results and provide clearer guidance on the most effective treatment modalities for athletes with patellar tendinopathy.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

FS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AA: Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SG: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. DM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

US guided Dry Needling, Ultrasound guided Dry Needling; PT, patellar tendinopathy; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis; RCT, randomized controlled trials; PTLE, progressive tendon-loading exercise; VISA-P, Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment questionnaire for patellar tendons; EET, eccentric exercise therapy; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; NRS, Numeric Rating Scale; PRP, platelet-rich plasma; HSR, heavy slow resistance.

References

1. Khan KM, Cook JL, Kannus P, Maffulli N, Bonar SF. Time to abandon the “tendinitis” myth. BMJ. (2002) 324(7338):626–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.626

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Van der Worp H, de Poel HJ, Diercks RL, van den Akker-Scheek I, Zwerver J. Jumper’s knee or lander’s knee? A systematic review of the relation between jump biomechanics and patellar tendinopathy. Int J Sports Med. (2014) 35(8):714–22. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358674

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lian OB, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Prevalence of jumper’s knee among elite athletes from different sports: a cross-sectional study. Am J Sports Med. (2005) 33(4):561–7. doi: 10.1177/0363546504270454

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Tayfur A, Haque A, Salles JI, Malliaras P, Screen H, Morrissey D. Are landing patterns in jumping athletes associated with patellar tendinopathy? A systematic review with evidence gap map and meta-analysis. Sports Med. (2022) 52(1):123–37. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01550-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gaida JE, Cook J. Treatment options for patellar tendinopathy: critical review. Curr Sports Med Rep. (2011) 10(5):255–70. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31822d4016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Lim HY, Wong SH. Effects of isometric, eccentric, or heavy slow resistance exercises on pain and function in individuals with patellar tendinopathy: a systematic review. Physiother Res Int. (2018) 23(4):e1721. doi: 10.1002/pri.1721

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Dan M, Phillips A, Johnston RV, Harris IA. Surgery for patellar tendinopathy (jumper’s knee). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2019) 9(9):Cd013034.31546279

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

8. Mendonça LM, Leite HR, Zwerver J, Henschke N, Branco G, Oliveira VC. How strong is the evidence that conservative treatment reduces pain and improves function in individuals with patellar tendinopathy? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials including GRADE recommendations. Br J Sports Med. (2020) 54(2):87–93. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099747

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Challoumas D, Pedret C, Biddle M, Ng NYB, Kirwan P, Cooper B, et al. Management of patellar tendinopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised studies. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. (2021) 7(4):e001110. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001110

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Breda SJ, Oei EHG, Zwerver J, Visser E, Waarsing E, Krestin GP, et al. Effectiveness of progressive tendon-loading exercise therapy in patients with patellar tendinopathy: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med. (2021) 55(9):501–9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103403

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Breda SJ, de Vos RJ, Krestin GP, Oei EHG. Decreasing patellar tendon stiffness during exercise therapy for patellar tendinopathy is associated with better outcome. J Sci Med Sport. (2022) 25(5):372–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.01.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. López-Royo MP, Ríos-Díaz J, Galán-Díaz RM, Herrero P, Gómez-Trullén EM. A comparative study of treatment interventions for patellar tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2021) 102(5):967–75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.01.073

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Lindstedt SL, LaStayo PC, Reich TE. When active muscles lengthen: properties and consequences of eccentric contractions. News Physiol Sci. (2001) 16:256–61.11719600

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

14. Stoychev V, Finestone AS, Kalichman L. Dry needling as a treatment modality for tendinopathy: a narrative review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. (2020) 13(1):133–40. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09608-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. (2009) 339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Panic N, Leoncini E, de Belvis G, Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One. (2013) 8(12):e83138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083138

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. (2007) 7:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-16

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. (2008) 101(1):17–24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Visentini PJ, Khan KM, Cook JL, Kiss ZS, Harcourt PR, Wark JD. The VISA score: an index of severity of symptoms in patients with jumper’s knee (patellar tendinosis). Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. J Sci Med Sport. (1998) 1(1):22–8. doi: 10.1016/S1440-2440(98)80005-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels AG, Boers M, Bouter LM, et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. (1998) 51(12):1235–41. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00131-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Lima MTBME, Lima JGM, de Andrade MF, Bergmann A. Low-level laser therapy in secondary lymphedema after breast cancer: systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. (2014) 29(3):1289–95. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1240-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Omar MT, Shaheen AA, Zafar H. A systematic review of the effect of low-level laser therapy in the management of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. (2012) 20(11):2977–84. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1546-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Law MSD, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Critical Review Form Quantitative Studies Ontario McMaster University McMaster University (1998). Available at: https://www.canchild.ca/en/canchildresources/resources/quantguide.pdf (Accessed June 15, 2022).

Google Scholar

24. Malliaras P, Cook J, Purdam C, Rio E. Patellar tendinopathy: clinical diagnosis, load management, and advice for challenging case presentations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. (2015) 45(11):887–98. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5987

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Dragoo JL, Wasterlain AS, Braun HJ, Nead KT. Platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for patellar tendinopathy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. (2014) 42(3):610–8. doi: 10.1177/0363546513518416

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Rio E, van Ark M, Docking S, Moseley GL, Kidgell D, Gaida JE, et al. Isometric contractions are more analgesic than isotonic contractions for patellar tendon pain: an in-season randomized clinical trial. Clin J Sport Med. (2017) 27(3):253–9. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000364

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. van Ark M, Cook JL, Docking SI, Zwerver J, Gaida JE, van den Akker-Scheek I, et al. Do isometric and isotonic exercise programs reduce pain in athletes with patellar tendinopathy in-season? A randomised clinical trial. J Sci Med Sport. (2016) 19(9):702–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.11.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Holden S, Lyng K, Graven-Nielsen T, Riel H, Olesen JL, Larsen LH, et al. Isometric exercise and pain in patellar tendinopathy: a randomized crossover trial. J Sci Med Sport. (2020) 23(3):208–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.09.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Dimitrios S, Pantelis M, Kalliopi S. Comparing the effects of eccentric training with eccentric training and static stretching exercises in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy. A controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. (2012) 26(5):423–30. doi: 10.1177/0269215511411114

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A, et al. Explanation of the 2011 OCEBM Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2011). Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 (Accessed July 15, 2022).

Google Scholar

31. Rio E, Kidgell D, Purdam C, Gaida J, Moseley GL, Pearce AJ, et al. Isometric exercise induces analgesia and reduces inhibition in patellar tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med. (2015) 49(19):1277–83. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094386

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Klimek L, Bergmann KC, Biedermann T, Bousquet J, Hellings P, Jung K, et al. Visual analogue scales (VAS): measuring instruments for the documentation of symptoms and therapy monitoring in cases of allergic rhinitis in everyday health care: Position Paper of the German Society of Allergology (AeDA) and the German Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), ENT Section, in collaboration with the working group on Clinical Immunology, Allergology and Environmental Medicine of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKHC). Allergo J Int. (2017) 26(1):16–24. doi: 10.1007/s40629-016-0006-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar