Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Radiol.
Sec. Cardiothoracic Imaging
Volume 4 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1487895

Comparison of Dark-field Chest Radiography and CT for the Assessment of COVID-19 Pneumonia

Provisionally accepted
Florian Tilman Gassert Florian Tilman Gassert 1*Henriette Bast Henriette Bast 1Theresa Urban Theresa Urban 1Manuela Frank Manuela Frank 1Felix G Gassert Felix G Gassert 1Konstantin Willer Konstantin Willer 2Rafael Schick Rafael Schick 2Bernhard Renger Bernhard Renger 1Thomas Köhler Thomas Köhler 3Alexandra Karrer Alexandra Karrer 1Andreas P Sauter Andreas P Sauter 1Alexander Fingerle Alexander Fingerle 1Marcus R Makowski Marcus R Makowski 1Franz Pfeiffer Franz Pfeiffer 1,2Daniela Pfeiffer Daniela Pfeiffer 1
  • 1 University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • 2 Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
  • 3 Philips, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Dark-field chest radiography allows the assessment of the structural integrity of the alveoli by exploiting the wave properties of x-rays. Purpose: To compare the qualitative and quantitative features of dark-field chest radiography in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with conventional CT imaging. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, patients aged at least 18 years who underwent chest CT for clinically suspected COVID-19 infection were screened for participation. Inclusion criteria were a CO-RADS score ≥ 4, the ability to consent to the procedure and to stand upright without help. Participants were examined with a clinical dark-field chest radiography prototype. For comparison, a healthy control cohort of 40 subjects was evaluated. Using Spearman’s correlation coefficient, correlation was tested between dark-field coefficient and CT-based COVID-19 index and visual total CT score as well as between the visual total dark-field score and the visual total CT score. Results: A total of 98 participants (mean age 58 ± 14 [standard deviation] years; 59 men) were studied. The areas of signal intensity reduction observed in dark-field images showed a strong correlation with infiltrates identified on CT scans. The dark-field coefficient had a negative correlation with both the quantitative CT-based COVID-19 index (r = -.34, p = .001) and the overall CT score used for visual grading of COVID-19 severity (r = -.44, p < .001). The total visual dark-field score for the presence of COVID-19 was positively correlated to the total CT score for visual COVID-19 severity grading (r = .85, p < .001). Conclusion: COVID-19 pneumonia-induced signal intensity losses in dark-field chest radiographs are consistent with CT-based findings, showing the technique’s potential for COVID-19 assessment.

    Keywords: COVID-19, Radiography, Dark-field, Pneumonia, Lung imaging

    Received: 28 Aug 2024; Accepted: 30 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Gassert, Bast, Urban, Frank, Gassert, Willer, Schick, Renger, Köhler, Karrer, Sauter, Fingerle, Makowski, Pfeiffer and Pfeiffer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Florian Tilman Gassert, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.