REVIEW article

Front. Quantum Sci. Technol.

Sec. Basic Science for Quantum Technologies

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frqst.2025.1569496

This article is part of the Research Topic100 Years of Quantum Science and TechnologyView all 4 articles

Statistical Contextual Explanation of Quantum Paradoxes

Provisionally accepted
  • University of Quebec in Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

We celebrate this year hundred years of quantum mechanics. Incorrect interpretations of QM and incorrect mental models of invisible details of quantum phenomena lead to paradoxes. To explain these paradoxes we advocate the statistical contextual interpretation (SCI) of quantum mechanics.. State vectors (wave functions) and various operators are purely mathematical entities allowing making quantitative probabilistic predictions. State vector describes an ensemble of identically prepared physical systems and a specific operator represents a class of equivalent measurements of a physical observable. A collapse of wave function is not a mysterious and instantaneous physical process. A collapsed quantum state describes a new ensemble of physical systems prepared in a particular way. A value of a physical observable, such as a spin projection, associated with a pure quantum ensemble is a characteristic of this ensemble created by its interaction with measuring instruments. Probabilities are objective properties of random experiments in which empirical frequencies stabilize. Following Einstein, SCI rejects claim that quantum mechanics provides a complete description of individual physical systems but it remains agnostic on whether a more detailed subquantum description can be found or is necessary. In conformity with Bohr contextuality, SCI rejects Bell-local and Bell-causal hidden variable models. Nevertheless, by incorporating into probabilistic model contextual hidden variables measuring instruments, long distance quantum correlations studied in Bell Tests can be explained without evoking quantum nonlocality or retrocausality. SCI allows explaining several quantum phenomena without evoking quantum magic. SCI does not claim to provide a complete description of quantum phenomena. In fact, we even don't know whether quantum probabilities provide a complete description of existing experimental data. Time series of experimental data may contain much more information than it is obtained using empirical frequencies and histograms. Therefore, predictable completeness of quantum mechanics has be tested and not taken for granted.

Keywords: EPR paradox, Bell -CHSH inequalities, Bell tests, entanglement, Quantum nonlocality, Contextuality, Completeness of quantum mechanics

Received: 31 Jan 2025; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 KUPCZYNSKI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: MARIAN KUPCZYNSKI, University of Quebec in Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more