ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1596812
This article is part of the Research TopicDigital Health Innovations for Patient-Centered CareView all 19 articles
Potential categories of perceived recurrence risk in stroke patients and their relationship with self-management ability
Provisionally accepted- Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aimed to identify latent profile categories of recurrence risk perception among stroke patients, analyze the factors influencing these categories, and examine their correlation with self-management ability. The findings are intended to provide new insights and a foundation for enhancing self-management in stroke patients. Methods: A total of 221 stroke patients admitted to the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery at Xuzhou Central Hospital between January 2024 and December 2024 were selected using a convenience sampling method. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Stroke Patient Recurrence Risk Perception Assessment Scale, and the Stroke Patient Self-Management Ability Assessment Scale. Statistical analyses included factor analysis and pairwise comparisons to examine influencing factors and their relationships. Results: A total of 221 questionnaires were distributed, with 23 invalid responses excluded, yielding an effective response rate of 89.59%. The mean recurrence risk perception score was 39.63 ± 5.67, while the mean self-management ability score was 85.69 ± 12.33. Latent profile analysis identified three distinct categories of recurrence risk perception: high -level, medium -level, and low -level risk perception groups.Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in recurrence risk perception based on age (χ²=11.132, P=0.025), education level (χ²=5.523, P=0.044), living environment (χ²=9.868, P=0.007), disease duration (χ²=13.142, P=0.011), and stroke frequency (χ²=25.710, P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that age, living environment, disease duration, and stroke frequency were protective factors for recurrence risk perception (OR < 1, P < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed that patients in the high -level risk perception group exhibited significantly higher self-management ability compared to those in the medium -level (P < 0.01) and low -level risk perception groups (P < 0.01). Similarly, patients in the medium -level risk perception group demonstrated greater self-management ability than those in the low -level risk perception group (P < 0.01).This study utilized latent profile analysis to classify stroke patients' recurrence risk perception into three categories: high, medium, and low. These profiles were influenced by age, living environment, disease duration, and stroke frequency. Moreover, recurrence risk perception was significantly associated with self-management ability.
Keywords: Recurrence Risk Perception, Self-management ability, latent profile analysis, Influencing factors, Correlation
Received: 20 Mar 2025; Accepted: 24 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wu, Gong, Long and Yin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jie Yin, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.