ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1596381
This article is part of the Research TopicImpact of Physical Activity on Health and Behavioral Risks in AdolescentsView all 7 articles
Maximizing Sprint Performance among Adolescent Sprinters: A Controlled Evaluation of Functional, Traditional, and Combined Training Approaches
Provisionally accepted- 1Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdańsk, Poland
- 2Zhumadian No. 8 Junior High School, Zhumadian, China
- 3Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
- 4Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Sprint performance plays a crucial role in competitive sports, particularly among adolescent athletes. Training methodologies such as Functional Training (FT), Traditional Training (TT), and a Combined Training (CT) approach have been widely implemented to improve sprinting ability, agility, and coordination. However, the comparative effectiveness of these methods remains inconclusive. This study aims to evaluate the differential impact of FT, TT, and CT on key physiological and skill-related performance variables in adolescent sprinters. Methods: A total of 52 national-level adolescent sprinters (aged 15-18 years) were randomly assigned to four groups: Functional Training Group (FTG, n=13), Traditional Training Group (TTG, n=13), Combined Training Group (CTG, n=13), and Control Group (CG, n=13). The intervention lasted for eight weeks, with training sessions conducted six days a week. Sprint performance, agility, coordination, VO₂ max, muscular strength, and body fat percentage were assessed pre-and postintervention. A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to analyze within-and between-group differences, with significance set at p < 0.05.Results: CTG demonstrated the most significant improvements across all performance variables, including VO₂ max (+4.32%), muscular strength (+8.93%), and sprinting ability (-4.71%). FTG showed substantial gains in agility (-2.16%) and coordination (+4.40%), whereas TTG exhibited moderate improvements in strength (+1.43%) and sprint time (-2.18%). The CG group showed no significant changes. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant main effect of training interventions (F = 72.34, p < 0.001, η²p = 0.81), highlighting the superior efficacy of CTG.The findings suggest that a combined approach integrating FT and TT yields optimal improvements in sprint performance by enhancing both neuromuscular coordination and force production. While FT alone is effective in refining agility and coordination, TT primarily contributes to strength gains. The absence of structured training in the CG reinforces the necessity of targeted interventions for performance enhancement. These results provide valuable insights for coaches and sports scientists in designing sprint training programs for adolescent athletes. Future studies could explore the long-term effects of combined FT and TT interventions across different age groups and genders to assess their generalizability.
Keywords: functional training1, Traditional Training2, Combined Training3, Sprinting Performance4, physical fitness5, Skill-Related Performance6
Received: 19 Mar 2025; Accepted: 22 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Shao, Saha, Zhao and Karmakar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xiaohuan Liu, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdańsk, Poland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.