ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Aging and Public Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1592206

This article is part of the Research TopicPublic Health Outcomes: The Role of Social Security Systems in Improving Residents' Health WelfareView all 33 articles

Research on the Impact of Residents' Pension Insurance Choices Based on their Cognition of Pension Responsibility

Provisionally accepted
Lulin  ZHOULulin ZHOUWenling  ZHUWenling ZHU*Yupeng  CUIYupeng CUIYinghua  CHENYinghua CHENXinglong  XUXinglong XU
  • Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The aging of the world's population has become an increasingly serious issue in recent years, and pensions in all countries have become unsustainable to varying degrees. The sustainability of pension insurance is a pressing issue. Objective: This study examined Chinese residents' cognition of pension responsibility and its impact on their participation in pension insurance under the multi-pillar pension insurance system. Methods: Using data from the 2021 Chinese General Social Survey, the link between residents' cognition of pension responsibility and pension insurance participation was investigated through binary regression and disordered multiclassified logistic regression analysis.Results: First, there was a difference in the influence of economic and sociodemographic factors on the choice of basic and commercial pension insurance. Second, "offspring responsibility", as a dominant perception today, had a negative impact on participation in both basic and commercial pension insurance. The probability of individuals who hold the belief in the "three-party responsibility" participating only in basic pension insurance was significantly higher than that of those who agree with "offspring responsibility" or "self-responsibility". Third, the relationship between the cognition of pension responsibility and pension insurance participation was moderated by region of residence and people's access to information. Conclusion: Through system optimization, awareness campaigns, and education, efforts should be made to modernize and transform the concept of pensions, promote the coordinated development of basic and commercial pension insurance, and build a more comprehensive and sustainable multi-level pension security system.

Keywords: cognition of pension responsibility, multi-pillar pension insurance system, Pension willingness, Aging, pension insurance choices

Received: 18 Mar 2025; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 ZHOU, ZHU, CUI, CHEN and XU. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Wenling ZHU, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.