ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Digital Public Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1587163

This article is part of the Research TopicDigital Technologies in Chronic Disease Management: Strategies for Enhanced PreventionView all articles

Assessment of eHealth Literacy among Cardiovascular Disease Patients and Analysis of Influencing Factors

Provisionally accepted
Wei  WangWei Wang1Xiaoman  ZhangXiaoman Zhang1Xiaojing  ZhaoXiaojing Zhao1Chunxu  ChenChunxu Chen2Mengfan  JiaoMengfan Jiao2Wenhui  JiangWenhui Jiang3*
  • 1Department of Cardiology,Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
  • 2Department of Nursing, Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong, China
  • 3School of Nursing,Health Science Center,Xian Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the eHealth literacy of patients with cardiovascular diseases and uncover the associated influencing factors.The findings are intended to lay a solid foundation for formulating targeted strategies to enhance the health literacy of this patient population.The eHealth literacy score among cardiovascular disease patients was 20.46 ±9.54, with a passing rate of 38.6%. The overall mean score across all items was 2.5 ± 1.19. Specifically, for the sub-domains of internet health information service capabilities and application abilities, evaluation capabilities of internet health information and services, and decision -making capabilities of internet health information and services, the mean scores were 2.49±1.18, 2.67±1.32, and 2.66± 1.35, respectively. Findings from binary logistic regression analysis suggest that education level, sleep quality, residing in close proximity to a medical institution (distance < 5 km), prior utilization of medical information websites or search engines, as well as the interaction between proactive health awareness and utilization of medical information websites or search engines, were all influencing factors for the qualification of e -health literacy (P < 0.05). These results underscore the complex interplay of multiple factors in determining patients' eHealth literacy levels, which has important implications for the design and implementation of effective health information dissemination and patient education strategies in the digital age.Our findings reveal that the eHealth literacy among cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients remains at a relatively low level. This situation underscores the urgent need for interventions aimed at enhancing patients' proactive health awareness and delivering targeted eHealth training programs.Specifically, such initiatives should be designed to enable patients to accurately access, comprehensively understand, critically evaluate, and effectively apply health information in the digital realm. By doing so, we can empower CVD patients to better manage their health in the context of the digital age, ultimately leading to an improvement in their eHealth literacy levels. These efforts are not only crucial for individual patient care but also have broader implications for optimizing health outcomes at a population level.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease, Health Literacy, EHealth literacy, Health Education, Influencing factors

Received: 04 Mar 2025; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Chen, Jiao and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Wenhui Jiang, School of Nursing,Health Science Center,Xian Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more