ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1586988

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Erosion of Trust in the 21st Century: Origins, Implications, and SolutionsView all 6 articles

Building Trust in Rural Communities: Recruitment and Retention Strategies in Developmental Science

Provisionally accepted
Ava  ReckAva Reck1*Lauren  HolleyLauren Holley2Kyle  BowerKyle Bower2Sarah  WhitakerSarah Whitaker2Caroline  HallCaroline Hall2Courtney  BrownCourtney Brown2Alison  BergAlison Berg2Caroline  AlvaradoCaroline Alvarado3Diane  BalesDiane Bales2Katherine  SumaKatherine Suma2Kimberly  FowlerKimberly Fowler2Charles  GeierCharles Geier2Assaf  OshriAssaf Oshri2
  • 1University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
  • 2University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
  • 3New York University, New York City, New York, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Studying human development often requires intimate interpersonal queries and interactions with children and families. Such research necessitates moving beyond traditional lab settings to engage participants within their communities for an extended period of time. Building trust is essential for conducting ecologically valid, longitudinal research, particularly when working with diverse and historically underserved populations. Developing effective, practical strategies to foster trust and rapport enhances recruitment, retention, and the overall quality of developmental research. This manuscript examines the recruitment and retention strategies that facilitated trust and engagement in a longitudinal study involving rural participants in Northeast Georgia.Methodology: The continuum of community engagement model suggests that research recruitment efforts should involve more than direct participant outreach, toward a multifaceted, community-driven approach. The current study employs a mixed-methods framework to evaluate these strategies in fostering trust and participant engagement. Qualitative data was collected from study reflection notes, interviews with extension agents, and participant surveys, alongside quantitative measures tracking enrollment, contacts, referrals, and participant trust.Results: Our findings suggest that trust-building efforts, including community engagement teams, reciprocal community relationships, family and family-centered environments, and tailored communication strategies, enhanced participant engagement. Referrals emerged as the most effective method for recruitment. Integrating community-driven recruitment methods led to increased referrals and fostered long-term relationships and trust with community partners, but this success was only achieved after establishing connections and building trust within the community.Conclusion: Addressing historical mistrust and promoting research inclusivity requires iterative, community-centered approaches. Our study highlights the importance of transparent communication, adaptive recruitment strategies, and sustained community engagement. Findings provide a framework for future research aiming to enhance trust, recruitment, and retention in complex biomedical and behavioral developmental science, ensuring more representative and impactful studies.

Keywords: Building trust, Rural communities, Recruitment strategies, Retention strategies, developmental science, Community engagement Community Engagement, rural engagement, Recruitment and retention

Received: 03 Mar 2025; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Reck, Holley, Bower, Whitaker, Hall, Brown, Berg, Alvarado, Bales, Suma, Fowler, Geier and Oshri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ava Reck, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more