
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1572611
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Teaching and Learning in Health Education and Promotion View all 23 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction. Pharmacovigilance plays a vital role in ensuring drug safety and protecting public health. Oropharyngeal adverse drug reactions (O-ADRs) are found to be under-reported, especially by oral health professionals, limiting the identification and management of these events.Aims. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of healthcare professionals and students regarding O-ADRs and to assess their specific expertise by a self-elearning test.Methods. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a KAP questionnaire between April 2023 and April 2024, involving 943 participants, including physicians, dentists, dental hygienists, and students. Additionally, three sets of self-e-learning tests on O-ADRs were administered. The study employed descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and logistic regression to analyze factors affecting KAP and reporting behaviors.Results. Significant gaps in KAP were identified. Only 26.5% of participants demonstrated frequent best practices for reporting O-ADRs, with dentists and dental hygienists showing lower reporting rates (13.8% and 9.3%, respectively) compared to physicians (18.8%). The results of logistic regression analyses showed that practical knowledge was significantly associated with work experience (OR = 2.15, p = 0.026). Students exhibited the lowest levels of practical knowledge and reporting proficiency, with only 17.6% demonstrating competence. The self-e-learning test highlighted knowledge deficits: only 22.9% of participants correctly identified O-ADR associated with antiseptic mouth rinses, additional 30.2% recognized those linked to antimicrobial drugs.Conclusions. This study highlights the need for targeted educational interventions to address gaps in O-ADR knowledge and practice. Tailored training, user-friendly digital tools, and a strong pharmacovigilance culture are crucial for improving reporting rates and ensuring patient safety.
Keywords: Pharmacovigilance, oropharyngeal adverse drug reactions (O-ADRs), knowledge, attitudes, And practices (KAP), Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting, Healthcare education
Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 La Mantia, Marcon, Coppini, Buttacavoli, Panzarella, Colella, Capuano, Sportiello, Parrinello, Morreale, Oteri, Bellavia, Fusco, Mauceri, Bazzano, Seminara, Di Fede and Campisi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Martina Coppini, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.) University of Palermo, Italy, Palermo, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.