
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Digital Public Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563188
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Hip fracture presents a major healthcare challenge globally. While numerous Douyin videos address hip fracture, their information quality and factors affecting user comment attitudes remain uncertain.Objective: This study aims to analyze the content, information quality, and user comment attitudes of videos depicting hip fractures on Chinese TikTok (Douyin).The search term "hip fracture" was used on Douyin, which resulted in 170 samples being included. Video information quality was assessed using the GQS and PEMAT scales. Video content was analyzed using DivoMiner. User comments were extracted using Gooseeker, and user comment attitudes were interpreted as positive, neutral, or negative using the Weiciyun website. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 29.0, including non-parametric tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. The identified factors were then included in a multivariate logistic regression analysis to examine their impact on user comment attitudes.Results: Health professionals were the primary source of videos (136/138, 98.6%). The overall information quality of the videos was moderate (median 3, IQR 2.00-4.00). Douyin videos were relatively high in understandability (median 72.70%, IQR 63.60%-81.80%) but low in actionability (median 33.33%, IQR 0-66.67%). Most videos focused on treatment (139/170, 81.8%). Regarding user comment attitudes, the majority of videos were received with positive comments (113/170, 66.5%), followed by negative comments (39/170, 22.9%) and neutral comments (18/170, 10.6%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed three factors influencing positive attitudes: the GQS score (OR 13.824, 95% CI 6.033-31.676), understandability (OR 2.281, 95% CI 1.542-5.163) and not mentioning risk factors in videos (OR 0.291,95%CI 0.091-0.931).The majority of hip fracture videos on Douyin were created by health professionals and had intermediate information quality, with user comment attitudes remaining positive. However, these videos often lacked actionability and had insufficient mention of prevention and rehabilitation content. Videos with higher information quality that addressed hip fracture risk factors received more positive user comments. This study suggests that publishers of hip fracture-related videos should improve actionability while simultaneously paying attention to both prevention and rehabilitation content to enhance the educational value of these videos.
Keywords: Hip Fractures, Douyin, Information quality, Short video, user comment attitudes
Received: 19 Jan 2025; Accepted: 03 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Lin, Zhang, Li, Ju, Chen, Fu, Huang, Zhu, Sun, Guo, Gao, Hu, Liu and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Gang Liu, Department of Orthopedics and Center for Orthopedic Diseases Research, Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan Province, China
Baolu Zhang, School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.