data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Occupational Health and Safety
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1552687
This article is part of the Research Topic Mineral Particles and Fibers and Human Health Risks: State-of-the-Art in Characterization, Analysis, Tissue Analytics, Exposure Thresholds for Risk, Epidemiology, and Risk Assessment for Science-Based Regulation and Disease Prevention and Implications for Occupational Health and Safety View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
To quantify, after extending follow-up 15 years, the relationship between occupational respirable crystalline silica (RCS) exposure and risk of silicosis and lung cancer in the German Porcelain Workers Cohort Study.Porcelain workers enrolled in a mandatory medical surveillance program including triennial chest x-rays and alive at the end of the previous study follow-up were followed through December 2020 for lung cancer mortality and silicosis incidence. Cause of death was determined from death certificates. Silicosis cases were identified by re-reading x-rays of individuals remaining in the medical surveillance program or filing insurance claims for silicosis. Individual RCS exposures were estimated using a job exposure matrix (JEM) based on about 8,000 historical industrial hygiene RCS measurements. Cause-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and Cox proportional hazards ratios (HRs) and their 95% CIs were estimated by cumulative and average exposure groups, controlling for age, sex, smoking status and employment duration.Total deaths increased from 1,610 (9.1%) to 4,586 (26%) over 537,129 total person-years at risk. All-cause mortality was elevated among men (SMR=1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.14); however, a deficit was seen among women (SMR=0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.98). No statistically significantly increased mortality was seen due to lung cancer, renal cancer, or non-malignant renal disease -conditions reportedly associated with RCS exposure. Lung cancer mortality was unrelated to RCS exposure level. For silicosis cases classified using International Labor Organization (ILO) categories ≥1/1 or 1/0, risk was strongly associated with estimated average exposure >0.10 mg/m 3 and 0.15 mg/m 3, and cumulative exposure >3.0 mg/m 3 -years and >1.0 mg/m 3 -years, respectively. Despite the large number (n=284) of lung cancer deaths and high historical RCS exposures, no excess risk and no relationship with exposure level were seen. RCS exposure was strongly associated with silicosis risk, with clear exposure thresholds. This study further confirms the lack of increased lung cancer risk at RCS levels historically prevalent in the German porcelain industry and that exposures exceeding estimated thresholds clearly increases silicosis risk. Occupational exposure levels in the German porcelain industry in recent decades have remained well below these thresholds; therefore, few additional silicosis cases are expected.
Keywords: Respirable crystalline silica, Silicosis, lung cancer, occupational epidemiology, exposure thresholds
Received: 28 Dec 2024; Accepted: 27 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Birk, Mundt, Crawford and Driesel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Kenneth A. Mundt, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, 01003, Massachusetts, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.