Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Aging and Public Health

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1542918

This article is part of the Research Topic Enhancing Geriatric Care: International Collaboration and Best Practices for Aging Populations View all 8 articles

Gender Differences in Quality of Dying and Death among Older Adults: A Cross-sectional Study in China

Provisionally accepted
Xiaohong Feng Xiaohong Feng *Shumei Liang Shumei Liang Xiujun Dai Xiujun Dai Jinlin Du Jinlin Du Zheng Yang Zheng Yang
  • Graduate school, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The aging of China is deepening year by year, and improving the quality of dying and death (QODD) is increasingly becoming an urgent and realistic need. This study explores the gender differences in the quality of dying and death and its influencing factors among Chinese elderly people, aiming to provide assistance to the relevant authorities in formulating end-of-life care policies for the elderly, and to adapt to the needs of an aging society. Methods Based on the data of the Chinese Longitudinal Health Longevity Survey (CLHLS) during 2008-2018, a total of 7,341 respondents were included. Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the quality of dying and death among Chinese elderly people and its influencing factors. In addition, A Fairlie decomposition analysis (FDA) was conducted to ascertain the degree of influence exerted by various contributing factors. Results The proportion of high QODD among female elderly (63.80%) was significantly higher than male elderly (56.00%), which was statistically significant. Logistic regression showed that age, residence, home facilities score, place of death, medical costs, got timely treatment, number of chronic diseases and unconsciousness were the factors influencing QODD among male elderly. Meanwhile, residence, marital status, home facilities score, place of death, got timely treatment, bedridden, suffered from serious illness, unconsciousness and drinking were the factors influencing QODD among female elderly. FDA showed that 47.89% of the differences in QODD were caused by the observed variables, while 52.11% of the differences were caused by gender differences and unmeasured variables. Conclusion Chinese men have a poorer QODD compared to women. The main factors contributing to this difference were age, the number of chronic diseases, suffered from serious illness, unconsciousness, place of death, residence and home facilities scores. To ensure successful aging, the relevant departments should focus on these factors and work towards reducing the gender differences in QODD.

    Keywords: quality of dying and death, older adults, gender differences, Fairlie decomposition analysis, CLHLS

    Received: 10 Dec 2024; Accepted: 19 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Feng, Liang, Dai, Du and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaohong Feng, Graduate school, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more