
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1537049
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background and aims: Timely distribution of COVID-19 vaccines was particularly important for developing countries that do not have strong health systems and related infrastructure. We analyze data from the Guayas province of Ecuador, an area particularly affected by the pandemic, to determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and the effect of the timing of the second dose of COVID-19 vaccines on the seroprevalence SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies.Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 1,761 individuals aged 18 and older who voluntarily enrolled prior to and during the initial phase of vaccine rollout in Ecuador (October 2020 to July 2022). IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies were assessed by an in-house ELISA to evaluate the immune response to Pfizer (BioNTech, Spike mRNA) and AstraZeneca (Oxford, AstraZeneca Spike) vaccine in the Guayas province. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions were employed to determine the effect of delayed second doses later than prescribed by the manufacturer for both vaccines.Results: Before the vaccination campaign, we estimated an RBD IgG seroprevalence of 27,7% (95% CI: 23.6- 27, n=469). The estimate increased to 89,4% (95% CI: 87.7-91.18, n= 1235) after the first vaccine dose and to 92,6% (95% CI: 90.7-94.5, n=748) after the second dose. Individuals who received the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine later than the recommended dose showed significantly lower levels of IgG antibodies two to three weeks after receiving the second dose than those who received the dose within the recommended timeframe. Furthermore, we did not find any effect on RBD IgG antibody levels in those who received a second dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine during the first and second parts of the recommended vaccination window.Conclusion: The results suggest that a significant portion of the study population was already infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to the vaccination. As expected, seropositivity increased alongside vaccination efforts. We determined that Pfizer vaccine recipients should be adhered to vaccine timing guidelines. Furthermore, resource-limited countries should consider administering vaccines with flexibility in dosing intervals, such as AstraZeneca, as it allows for a wider time frame without significantly reducing the boosting of IgG antibodies.
Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 RBD, IgG, Cross-sectional study, Vaccine, in-house ELISA assay, seroprevalence
Received: 30 Nov 2024; Accepted: 10 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Malacatus Arboleda, Isaac Barbotó Ramírez, Sánchez, Moscoso, Rhodes, Coloma, GUEVARA, Espinoza‐Fuentes, Fernandez, Morey-León and Andrade-Molina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Derly Andrade-Molina, Laboratorio de Ciencias Ómicas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.