data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Life-Course Epidemiology and Social Inequalities in Health
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532372
This article is part of the Research Topic Influence of Social Determinants on Wellbeing in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Empirical evidence regarding the relationship between social determinants of health (SDH) and renal outcomes remains limited. Consequently, the objective of this study was to investigate the potential association between SDH and the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) across various levels.Methods: Data were sourced from the 2011 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), which included 6,290 Chinese participants aged 40 years and older. Among these participants, 4,115 underwent a follow-up assessment in the 2015 survey. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of CKD, operationally defined as a reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate to less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m² . To analyze the association between varying levels of SDH and renal outcomes, a Cox proportional hazards regression model was employed.The findings indicate that, in comparison to individuals with a pension, higher education, and no need for family support, the risk of developing CKD increased by 43%, 49%, and 52%, respectively. Furthermore, the combination of requiring family support, being unmarried, and lacking medical insurance was associated with an elevated incidence of CKD. Utilizing the counting model of adverse SDH indicators, it was observed that when the number of adverse SDH was equal to or greater than four, there was a significant increase in the risk of CKD. The incidence density of CKD was found to rise in correlation with the severity of adverse SDH, with the incidence density in the adverse SDH group being 0.06 per person-year higher than that in the favorable SDH group. After adjusting for multiple variables, the hazard ratio (HR) for incident CKD was 2.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46-4.16) in the adverse SDH group compared to the favorable SDH group, a finding that persisted across various subgroups.Research indicates that financial support, pensions, education, marital status, and health insurance significantly impact CKD risk. Higher income, pension coverage, education, marital stability, and insurance lower this risk. Evaluating adverse SDH indicators helps assess individual SDH levels and CKD risk, with four or more indicators suggesting high risk. Therefore, adverse SDH measures can predict CKD.
Keywords: social determinants of health, Chronic Kidney Disease, CHARLS, Chinese, older people
Received: 21 Nov 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Chen, Chen, Liu, Huang, Li, Liang and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xue Chen, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
Lang Chen, People's Hospital of Luchuan, Yulin, Shanxi Province, China
Yaorong Liu, People's Hospital of Beiliu, Yulin, China
Jian Huang, People's Hospital of Beiliu, Yulin, China
Peixia Li, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Yulin, Shaanxi Province, China
Dianyin Liang, School of Medicine, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, 545026, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
Jingyu Chen, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.