
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Substance Use Disorders and Behavioral Addictions
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1528971
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations in Recovery Science: Pathways, Policies, and Platforms that Promote Thriving After AddictionView all 15 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Opioid use disorder is a U.S. epidemic, and recovery housing plays a critical role by providing stable, supportive environments that promote long-term recovery. However, little is known about the sustainability of recovery homes, particularly those serving people taking medications for opioid use disorder. We applied thematic analysis to interviews with 29 staff and operators from 10 recovery homes serving people taking medications for opioid use disorder across five Texas cities. Operators relied on diverse funding sources, leveraged strategic partnerships and professional certifications, and planned to charge rent when public funding ended. Staff and operators balanced financial sustainability with maintaining quality services. Findings offer guidance for sustaining recovery homes that support medications for opioid use disorder. Recovery home operators can leverage professional networks, strengthen partnerships, rely on diverse funding sources, and reduce operational costs to sustain services. Policymakers can further support sustainability by establishing long-term funding mechanisms and reducing financial barriers to professional certification, ultimately improving service quality and access.
Keywords: MOUD, Dissemination and implementation science, sustainability, Treatment, Maintenance, Substitution, Sober living homes, Recovery support services
Received: 15 Nov 2024; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zoschke, Gallardo, Gillespie, Stewart, Rodriguez, McCurdy and Wilkerson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: J Michael Wilkerson, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health, Houston, Houston, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.