ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health

Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1521414

Spatiotemporal Patterns and Social Determinants of County Life Expectancy in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Provisionally accepted
Youming  DongYouming Dong1Mengcheng  WangMengcheng Wang1Yaya  SongYaya Song1Zeyu  YiZeyu Yi1Jiulang  PengJiulang Peng1Xiyan  MaoXiyan Mao1*Xianjin  HuangXianjin Huang1,2*
  • 1School of Geography and Ocean Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Carbon Neutrality and Territorial Space Optimization, Ministry of Natural Resources, Nanjing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Revealing the spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics of population life expectancy (LE) and exploring the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in impacts of social determinants of health (SDOH) is a crucial foundation for the scientific allocation of regional public resources and the formulation and implementation of localized public health policies.The study focused on 1,068 county-level units in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) of China, utilizing census data from 2000, 2010, and 2020 to uncover the spatiotemporal differentiation patterns of county-level LE. The Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (GTWR) model was employed to analyze the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in impacts of various SDOH on LE and the differences in effects among different types of county-level administrative divisions. Results: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the average LE in the counties of the YREB had gradually increased from 72.3 years to 81.3 years, with a spatial pattern of LE showing that the eastern region exceeded the central region, which exceeded the western region. (2) The high-high clusters were primarily concentrated in urban agglomerations, while low-low clusters were predominantly located in the western region of the YREB. (3) Overall, the gender ratio (GR) and family size (FS) negatively impacted LE, while the average years of education (AYE), the logarithm of per capita disposable income (PDI(ln)), per capita housing area (PHA), and healthcare professionals per 1,000 people (PHP) had positive effects. (4) The impact of different SDOH varied across space and time. Furthermore, the effects of different SDOH varied among different types of county-level administrative divisions. Conclusions: These findings encourage local policymakers to focus on socioeconomic development at the county level, rationally allocate public resources, and formulate and implement localized public health policies in a tailored and orderly manner, thereby promoting spatial equity in population health.

Keywords: Life Expectancy, Spatiotemporal pattern, social determinants of health, Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression Model, The Yangtze River Economic Belt

Received: 01 Nov 2024; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Dong, Wang, Song, Yi, Peng, Mao and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xiyan Mao, School of Geography and Ocean Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
Xianjin Huang, School of Geography and Ocean Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more