The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Life-Course Epidemiology and Social Inequalities in Health
Volume 13 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506956
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing Equity in Maternal Health: Addressing the Care Needs of Underserved Women View all 5 articles
Belonging: a meta-theme analysis of women's community-making in group antenatal and postnatal care
Provisionally accepted- 1 City St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
- 2 Children's Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- 3 Group Care Global, United States, United States
- 4 University of South Carolina, Columbia, Missouri, United States
- 5 Vrije University Brussels, Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- 6 Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- 7 University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- 8 School of Nursing of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
- 9 Foundation for Perinatal Interventions and Research in Suriname (Perisur), Suriname, Suriname
- 10 Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- 11 Presbyterian Church of Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
- 12 University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
- 13 Action for Mothers and Children, Please note: "Kosovo" is not listed as an option. The country of affiliation is Kosovo., Albania
Health care systems are social institutions simulating microcosms of wider societies where unequal distribution of power and resources translate into inequities in health outcomes, experiences and access to services. Growing research on participatory women’s groups positively highlight the influence of group-based care on health and wellbeing for women, their infants, families and wider communities across different countries. With similarities in ethos and philosophies, group care combines relational, group-based facilitation and clinical care, uniquely offering an opportunity to examine the intersections of health and social care. With collated data from Group Care for the First 1000 Days (GC_1000), we conduct a qualitative meta-thematic analysis of women’s experiences of group antenatal and postnatal care in Belgium, Ghana, Kosovo, The Netherlands, South Africa, Suriname and The United Kingdom to better understand how and to what extent community-making engenders a sense of belonging amongst group care participants and how these experiences may address social well-being and health. Results from this analysis expose that women actively participate in community building in group care in three key ways: 1). Collective agreements, 2). Boundary setting and 3). Care Gestures, orchestrated via socio-spatial building embedded in key pillars of the model. This analysis also illustrates how a sense of belonging derived from group care can mobilise women to support and care for the wider community through communal building of health literacy which builds from individual to communal empowerment: 1). Individual Health, 2). Community Health, 3). Partner Involvement, 4). Social Care and 5). Including Wider Community in Group Care. This research study builds upon existing evidence from both group care and participatory women’s group literature, showcasing the potential of group-based care to holistically address women’s needs. This research further illustrates the ways women create a sense of belonging in the context of group care and highlights why belonging may be an integral component of the model’s facilitation of improved health and well-being for individuals as well as their wider communities. More research is needed to understand the link between belonging and community mobilisation in the context of group care and how it may address the needs of underserved communities.
Keywords: Group care, Maternity care, Meta-theme analysis, Belonging, Health inequities
Received: 06 Oct 2024; Accepted: 21 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Horn, Orgill, Billings, Slemming, Van Damme, Crone, Gwele, Leister, Hindori-Mohangoo, Beeckman, Bradley, Hindori, Abanga, Ryan, Bucinca and McCourt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Anna Horn, City St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.