data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1490846
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Knowledge gap theory posits that individuals with better education have better opportunities to obtain, understand and utilise available information.In a health-related context, this insight could lead to a more effective disease prevention.The aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that knowledge gap underlies differences in behaviour aimed at maintaining brain health.We conducted an online survey investigating Slovenian public view on brain, brain research, and science-based recommendations for brain health.The survey was filled out by a total of 2568 respondents, of whom 2450 completed it in full.They were divided into two subgroups based on their self-reported brain-related education, the lay (n=1012) and a topically educated group (n=1438).Among the latter, 728 participants reported to have a Bachelor's degree or higher education.We analysed the views of this sample subgroup and compared them with age-and education-matched lay subgroup (n=565).Educated individuals showed greater awareness and adherence to science-based recommendations compared to the lay respondents, specifically in the perceived importance of following a healthy diet, exercising, ensuring time for rest, relaxation and maintenance of social contacts, acquiring new knowledge and skills and using supplements that are considered to improve mental abilities (all p<0.005), but not in the perceived importance of getting enough sleep, avoiding drugs and alcohol or injuries and performing mentally-challenging activities or cognitive training (all p>0.10).Educated individuals more frequently reported following a healthy diet, engaging in physical activity and socialising, acquiring new knowledge and skills, performing mental challenges and cognitive training, and using supplements (all p<0.005), but not getting sufficient sleep, avoiding drugs, alcohol or injury, or ensuring time for rest and relaxation (all p>0.08).A larger proportion of lay (32%) than educated (17%) participants identified lack of information as a reason for not engaging in healthy practices (p<0.001).Educated participants outperformed lay individuals in identifying diseases amenable to lifestyle modification.Understanding the differences in brain health perceptions between educated and lay individuals is crucial for developing effective public health strategies.Our results highlight a substantial knowledge gap and the need for targeted educational interventions that account for varying degrees of knowledge in different population segments which could lead to better adherence to healthy lifestyle practices.
Keywords: Brain health, Brain Disorders, disease prevention, Public Engagement, Health Literacy, Knowledge gap
Received: 03 Sep 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Perovnik, Kos, Vidmar, Fabjan, Hawlina, Tomat, Trol and Bresjanac. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Matej Perovnik, SiNAPSA, Slovenian Neuroscience Association, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.