Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1478627

Waning neutralizing antibodies through 180 days after homologous and heterologous booster of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine

Provisionally accepted
Zhifei Chen Zhifei Chen 1Fangqin - xie Fangqin - xie 1*Hairong - zhang Hairong - zhang 1*Dong Li Dong Li 1*Suhan Zhang Suhan Zhang 1*Mengping Zhang Mengping Zhang 1*Junrong Li Junrong Li 1*Jianfen Xie Jianfen Xie 1*Lina Zhang Lina Zhang 2*Xiuhui Yang Xiuhui Yang 1*Dongjuan Zhang Dongjuan Zhang 1*
  • 1 Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China
  • 2 Zhangping Center for Disease Control and Prevention, zhangping, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    To enhance the personal immunity to COVID-19, a third booster dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines program campaign was implemented in China. Our study endeavored to compare the dynamics of neutralizing antibodies generated by four distinct booster vaccines against three kinds of live SARS-CoV-2 virus (wild-type, Delta AY.23, and Omicron BA5.2). This cohort study involved 320 healthy individuals, who were randomly assigned to four groups, to receive booster with inactivated vaccine (COVac and BIBP), the adenovirus type-5-vectored vaccine (Convidecia), and the recombinant protein-based vaccine (Zifivax), respectively, all the vaccines studied had the Wuhan variant as their parental variant. Participants recruited from December 2021 to June 2022, with a follow-up period of 180 days. We evaluated humoral immune responses and their longevity by measuring the geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus at various time points post-boost. After 180 days of follow-up, 310 participants completed the study. Across all booster groups, neutralizing antibodies against the wild-type virus declined sharply within the first 90 days, accounting for an 81.24% to 92.34% reduction, then slowed down with gradually decreasing decay rates. By day 14 post-boost, the ability to neutralize the Delta variant slightly diminished compared to the wild-type, whereas neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron variant exhibited a more pronounced decline, ranging from 10.78 to 19.88 times lower than those against the wild-type. Notably, heterologous boosting with the Convidecia vaccine maintained higher GMTs of neutralizing antibodies against both Delta and Omicron variants compared to the other boosters. At the 180 days post-boost, GMTs of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 had substantially decreased, yet individuals who received the Convidecia vaccine still exhibited higher titers than those who received other boosters. In summary, neutralizing antibody levels significantly waned 180 days after the third vaccine dose, with the most pronounced decline occurring within the initial 90 days.Heterologous boosting with Convidecia demonstrated a more robust, durable, and broad humoral immune response compared to boosting with inactivated vaccines or Zifivax, suggesting that adenovirus vector vaccines possess special advantage in the realm of vaccine development for preventing infectious diseases.

    Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Inactivated vaccine, Heterologous immunization, homologous immunization, neutralizing antibodies

    Received: 13 Aug 2024; Accepted: 08 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Chen, xie, zhang, Li, Zhang, Zhang, Li, Xie, Zhang, Yang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Fangqin - xie, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China
    Hairong - zhang, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China
    Dong Li, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China
    Suhan Zhang, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China
    Mengping Zhang, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China
    Junrong Li, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China
    Jianfen Xie, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China
    Lina Zhang, Zhangping Center for Disease Control and Prevention, zhangping, China
    Xiuhui Yang, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China
    Dongjuan Zhang, Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.