The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health and Nutrition
Volume 13 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1474400
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Approaches to Nutrition Counseling in Pediatric Dietetics - Guidelines, Practices, and Future Directions View all 5 articles
A study comparing positive benefits for parents, and their children, of children attending the UK’s Holiday Activities and Food programme to parents of non-attendees
Provisionally accepted- 1 Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- 2 University of Lincoln, Lincoln, England, United Kingdom
The Holiday Activities and Food (HAF) is a UK Department for Education (DfE) funded program that provides free food and activities for 5 -16-year-olds in receipt of means-tested free school meals. This evaluation focuses on parent/caregiver perceptions of HAF benefits during the 2021 and 2022 school holidays for a sample of parents/caregivers whose children attended HAF (n=736) and a sample who did not attend HAF (n=885). The results show that parents of children who attend HAF for 4 weeks (i.e., the '4-Week' HAF treatment group) report that their children engage in more weeks of physical activity compared to children in the Non-Attendee group (b = 0.59, 95% CI [0.25, 0.94]). Parents/caregivers of children who attended HAF for 6 weeks or more report no significant difference in household food insecurity compared to parents/caregivers in the Non-Attendee group (b = -0.27, 95% CI [-0.70, 0.16]). The results also show that parents/caregivers are more concerned about affordable childcare if their children attend 6 weeks or more of HAF (b = -1.33, 95% CI [-2.07, -0.59]). For parents and caregivers of children who attend HAF for 1 to 5 weeks there is no difference in self-reported Parental Wellbeing compared to parents/caregivers of non-attending children (b= 0.57, 95% CI [ -0.09,1.23]), but parents/caregivers whose children attend 6 weeks or more of HAF report significantly better wellbeing than parents in the control group (b = 1.12, 95% CI [0.56,1.69]). Parents and caregivers of attendees in the HAF treatment groups are no more or less likely to believe that children are safe in their neighbourhood than in the Non-Attendee group (b = 0.12, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.34] for 6 or more weeks of attendance vs non-attendees). These findings are discussed in relation to prior research, and we make several HAF policy recommendations.
Keywords: Holiday Activities and Food, physical activity, Food insecurity, School holidays camps, Parental wellbeing
Received: 01 Aug 2024; Accepted: 28 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Defeyter, Stretsky and Pepper. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Margaret (Greta) Anne Defeyter, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.