The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Digital Public Health
Volume 13 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1472706
HLS19-DIGI -a new instrument for measuring digital health literacy: development, validation and associations with determinants and health outcomes in 13 countries
Provisionally accepted- 1 Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel
- 2 Institut de recherche en sciences psychologiques, Faculté de psychologie et des sciences de l'éducation, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Walloon Brabant, Belgium
- 3 Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- 4 Public Health and Epidemiology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalberg, Denmark
- 5 Department of Health, Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- 6 Careum Foundation, Careum Center for Health Literacy, Zurich, Switzerland
- 7 Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences,, Elverum, Norway
- 8 Competence Centre Health Promotion and Healthcare, Austrian National Public Health Institute, Vienna, Austria
- 9 School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- 10 Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, oslo, Norway
- 11 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Care and Social Work, Trnava University, Trnava, Czechia
- 12 Czech Health Literacy Institute, Prague, Czechia
- 13 Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway
- 14 Department of Quality Measurement and Patient Survey, Austrian National Public Health Institute, vienna, Austria
- 15 Aix Marseille University, APHM INSERM, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM, Cancer, Biomedicine & Society Group, marseille, France
- 16 Direção-Geral da Saúde, Lisbon, Portugal
- 17 Global health literacy academy, Risskov, Denmark
- 18 Communication Unit, National Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva, Slovenia
Digital health information sources are playing an increasingly prominent role in health promotion, public health and in healthcare systems. Consequently, digital health literacy skills are likewise becoming increasingly important. Using a concept validation approach, the present study aimed to validate a digital health literacy measure applied in the European Health Literacy Survey 2019-2021 (HLS19) of the WHO M-POHL Network. Analyzing data from 29,160 respondents from 13 European countries, the scale displayed high internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) strengthened the hypothesized one-factor structure. In most countries, the data displayed acceptable fit to the unidimensional Rasch partial credit model (PCM). Pearson correlation with a measure of general health literacy showed sufficient discriminant validity, and a social gradient was found. Testing for predictive validity showed that the scale score predicts health-related outcomes. The study shows that considerable proportions of the general adult populations across 13 countries in Europe have limited DHL skills. The level of DHL has direct potential consequences for some forms of health service utilization, in some countries. Implications of the study include recommendations for improving digital health literacy, promoting organizational health literacy and quality assurance for digital health information and resources.
Keywords: digital health literacy, EHealth literacy, HLS19, digital health literacy measurement, measurement scale validation, health information technology literacy
Received: 29 Jul 2024; Accepted: 07 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Levin-Zamir, Van Den Broucke, Bíró, Bøggild, Bruton, De Gani, Søberg Finbråten, Gibney, Griebler, Griese, Guttersrud, Klocháňová, Kucera, Le, Link, Mancini, Miksova, Schaeffer, Ribeiro da Silva, Sorensen, Straßmayr, Telo De Arriaga, Vrdelja and Pelikan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
DIane Levin-Zamir, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel
Stephan Van Den Broucke, Institut de recherche en sciences psychologiques, Faculté de psychologie et des sciences de l'éducation, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Walloon Brabant, Belgium
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.