data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436838
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
As air pollution events increasingly threaten public health under climate change, more precise estimations of air pollutant exposure and the burden of diseases (BD) are urgently needed. However, current BD assessments from various sources of air pollutant concentrations and exposure risks, and the derived uncertainty still needs systematic assessment. Owing to growing health and air quality data availability, machine learning (ML) may provide a promising solution.This study proposed an ML-measurement-model fusion (MMF) framework that can quantify the air pollutant biases from the Chemical Transport Modeling (CTM) inputs, and further analyze the BD biases concerning various sources of air pollutant estimations and exposure risks. In our study region, the proposed ML-MMF framework successfully improves CTM-modeled PM2.5 (from R 2 =0.41 to R 2 =0.86) and O3 (from R 2 =0.48 to R 2 =0.82). The bias quantification results showed that premature deaths in the study region are mainly biased by boundary conditions (Improvement Ratio, IR=99%) and meteorology (91%), compared with emission and land-use data. The results of further analysis showed using observations only (PM2.5: 17%; O3: 56%) or the uncorrected CTM estimations (PM2.5: -18%; O3: 171%) contributed more BD biases compared with employing averaged risks without considering urbanization levels (PM2.5: -5%; O3: -4%).In conclusion, employing observations only, uncorrected CTM estimations, and homogeneous risks may contribute to non-negligible BD biases and affect regional air quality and risk management. To cope with increasing needs of finer-scale air quality management under climate change, our developed ML-MMF framework can provide a quantitative reference to improve CTM performance and priority toimprove input data quality and CTM mechanisms.
Keywords: PM 2.5, Ozone, machine learning, disease burden, Bias Correction
Received: 22 May 2024; Accepted: 28 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 KUO, Fu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Joshua S Fu, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, 37996, Tennessee, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.