data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1436805
This article is part of the Research Topic Aerospace Health and Safety: Today and the Future, Volume II View all 10 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Pre-employment screening is of utmost importance in high-risk occupations for the early diagnosis and prevention of cardiac and non-cardiac disease, and for risk mitigation. Recommendations for echocardiography screening, however, are contradictory. It was the aim of this study to retrospectively analyze echocardiography data from German military pilot applicant screening to find out in how many cases cardiac disease was diagnosed, and how often the diagnosis influenced aeromedical decision making. Methods: 6,110 screening echocardiographies from German military pilot applicants, 5,923 were male, examined between January 2007 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for findings and their impact on aeromedical decisions. Results: During a 14.5-year period, 4,477 out of 6,110 screening echocardiograms were normal. The remaining 1,633 applicants revealed a total of 1,962 abnormalities, mainly consisting of minor tricuspid and mitral valve regurgitations (81.9%). Due to echocardiography findings, 80 applicants (1.3%) were unfit for flying duties, 9 (0.1%) were fit with limitations, and 1,544 (25.3%) were fit with findings that had to be monitored over time, but which were not aeromedically relevant. The most common diagnoses leading to disqualification or limitations were bicuspid aortic valve with or without aortic regurgitation (84.9%) and mitral valve prolapse with or without regurgitation (9.3%). Conclusion: Percentages of abnormal findings were similar to other studies. Aeromedical assessments based on those findings, however, were slightly different, as they depend on national employment policies. As a consequence, the usefulness of echocardiography may vary between different countries and different professions, depending on the acceptance of certain findings for employment.
Keywords: Pre-employment screening, Echocardiography, pilot applicant, highrisk occupation, Aeromedical assessment, military
Received: 22 May 2024; Accepted: 25 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Guettler and Sammito. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Norbert Guettler, German Air Force Centre of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.