95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Md Mostafizur Rahman1*
A. B. M. Hasanuzzaman1
Musabber Ali Chisty2
Edris Alam3,4
Md Kamrul Islam5
Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam6- 1Department of Disaster Management and Resilience, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- 2Institute of Disaster Management and Vulnerability Studies, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- 3Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh
- 4Faculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- 5Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering College of Engineering, King Faisal University, AlAhsa, Saudi Arabia
- 6Department of Disaster Management, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh
Air pollution is a serious health concern in rapidly developing countries like Bangladesh. This study investigates the correlation between self-reported health issues related to air pollution and perceived air pollution among adult Bangladeshis. A face-to-face questionnaire was conducted with 398 adult residents who had lived in their current location for at least 3 years. The survey assessed self-reported health using 13 specific air pollution-related health problems. A linear regression model was then used to analyze factors affecting air pollution-related health status. Our findings reveal correlations between perceived air pollution and health issues. 90% of respondents reported air-polluted environments in their area, with the majority citing multiple sources (42%) of air pollution. Construction activities emerged as a predominant concern, identified by 31% of participants as a primary source of air pollution. Demographic factors play a crucial role in contributing to air pollution-related health problems. Notably, older age groups reported significantly higher health issues compared to their younger counterparts. Residents of Mirpur’s residential neighborhood experienced fewer health problems related to air pollution, indicating the influence of urban planning on public health. This interdisciplinary approach offers a comprehensive view of Bangladesh’s air pollution crisis, combining environmental science and public health perspectives. The findings emphasize the need for targeted policy interventions, including stricter regulations on construction activities to mitigate their impact on air quality, tailored public health interventions for vulnerable populations (especially older adults), and urban planning strategies that reduce exposure to air pollution in residential areas. Future research should investigate the long-term health impacts of chronic air pollution exposure and evaluate the effectiveness of various mitigation strategies. Addressing these issues can help create healthier, more resilient urban environments.
1 Introduction
Air pollution is a significant global concern, the largest environmental danger to human health, and the cause of one out of every nine annual fatalities (1). The world’s largest health burden comes from air pollution (2, 3). Gaseous and solid particles, including indoor and outdoor air pollution, cause air pollution. Outdoor air pollution, the “modern form of pollution,” has caused more deaths and disabilities than interior air pollution worldwide (4, 5). This invisible threat knows no borders, affecting developed and developing nations. It has emerged as one of our most pressing environmental challenges, casting a long shadow over public health and economic development worldwide. 99% of the global population breathes air that exceeds WHO guideline limits, containing high levels of pollutants (6). In 2019, ambient air pollution killed 4.5 million people, roughly twice as much indoor air pollution, especially in South Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia (4). In the last decade, research has increasingly highlighted the pervasive nature of air pollution. A study estimated that outdoor air pollution leads to 3.3 million premature deaths per year globally, with the majority occurring in Asia (7). This statistic underscores the urgency of addressing air quality on a global scale. Climate change will affect air quality in highly populated areas through atmospheric ventilation, dilution, removal processes, and precipitation changes, worsening the situation (8). Urban air pollution is a major issue since pollutant concentrations and potential victims are concentrated (9–11). Rapid urbanization, particularly in developing countries, has exacerbated air pollution concerns. The urban landscape can trap pollutants, creating “urban heat islands” that concentrate harmful substances. Poor urban air quality is becoming a major issue as more people relocate to cities and demand a clean, healthy atmosphere (12). Projected global population expansion, urbanization, and climate change influences on air conditions and weather variability exacerbate this (1, 13). Urbanization is a key indicator of economic growth. Urbanization helps human growth because urban inhabitants enjoy greater urban facilities, amenities, and public services; thus, they relocate to urban regions for jobs and better amenities, expanding urban areas (14). Significant evidence shows that airborne particles in this area harm health (15). According to studies, this is caused by increased private automobiles, unmaintained vehicles, low-quality gasoline, badly paved roads, and improper urban infrastructural activities (16). Thus, industrialization-caused air pollution is among the 10 biggest environmental health hazards associated with global mortality (17, 18). Research demonstrated how urban planning and design could either mitigate or exacerbate air pollution, highlighting the need for sustainable urban development strategies (19).
With its dense population and rapid industrial growth, Bangladesh faces particularly acute air quality issues. The Air Quality Life Index (AQLI) ranks Bangladesh as the world’s most air-polluted country, and it has highlighted four densely populated areas and the capital city, Dhaka, as the most vulnerable to air pollution-induced death loss (20, 21). Despite a 2.1% drop in particulate pollution from 2020, Bangladesh has had pollution 14 to 15 times the WHO standard for a decade. According to the index, particulate pollution reduces life expectancy by 6.8 years in Bangladesh, second only to cardiovascular disorders (20). Bangladesh’s air pollution sources are diverse, ranging from brick kilns and vehicle emissions to construction dust and industrial processes. For example, coal-burning brick kilns were found to be a major local air pollution source in Dhaka (22), with some 1,000 brick kilns spread across the Dhaka metro region (23). Still, these kilns only operate only during the dry seasons (24). Environmental stressors have been linked to several diseases. Children, women, and older people are especially sensitive to respiratory problems (25). It also contains chest infections, which can lead to influenza, pneumonia, lung cancer, etc. (26). People exposed to high pollution levels are prone to these issues. A cohort study found a relationship between exposure to high air pollutants and increased incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in urban Bangladesh (27). Research demonstrated a significant association between short-term exposure to air pollution and hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases in Dhaka (28). Air pollution is becoming the biggest worry, especially in Dhaka. This mega city has consistently ranked among the world’s most polluted cities in recent years. Dhaka is the country’s center in every way; every day, people come to this metropolis for jobs, treatment, and education. They are putting the air pollution issue beyond management. A study found that PM2.5 levels in Dhaka often exceed WHO guidelines by 5–10 times during the dry season (29).
Air pollution can harm physical and mental health, emphasizing the need for public health initiatives and effective communication (30, 31). Air pollution perception influences mobility, health, well-being, and quality of life (32, 33). Moreover, air quality perception might trigger psychological suffering (34). Since exposure to air pollution can lower life satisfaction and happiness, overall quality of life is impacted.
People’s perceptions of air quality play a crucial role in responding to health risks. The perceived air pollution has been shown in several studies (35–40). Observed air pollution measurements can be complemented by perceptions of air pollution (41). According to research, people’s perceptions of air quality affect how they perceive and act on health risks (41). If there were increased levels of air pollution, exposure may have directly impacted how polluting things were perceived, how health risks were regarded, symptoms, or illnesses. For instance, compared to the Respiratory Health in Northern Europe (RHINE) cohort, which was exposed to substantially lower quantities of air pollution, researchers found a far greater association between simulated air pollution and self-reported traffic intensity in Rome (42). However, a global study found that individuals often underestimate air pollution levels in their local area (43). A more thorough knowledge of the impact of air quality on public health is possible by combining perceived exposure with objective measures (44). This method helps determine how well air quality control plans and regulations work. Studies examining the relationship between pollution exposure and air quality perceptions help policymakers decide how to improve air quality and public health (45). In general, integrating both observable data and perceived air pollution helps provide a more complete picture of the effects of air pollution on human health and guides successful responses. It is crucial to consider how it is perceived to evaluate air pollution and its effects on the population, particularly in polluted areas.
Understanding how people perceive air quality requires robust research methodologies. Large-scale surveys remain a cornerstone of perception research. A study assessed air quality perceptions and reported behaviors among four Spanish cities (46). They focused on how different cities’ populations perceive air pollution, risk perceptions, and self-reported mitigation measures for ambient air pollution. Another study was on public awareness of air pollution and health threats (47). Statistical analyses of datasets can reveal patterns in perception. A multi-divisional study assessed the perception of air pollution in Bangladesh (48). Self-reported health includes psychological, social, and physical health that cannot be measured by morbidity (49, 50). Low self-reported health is strongly linked to early death because it is intrinsically tied to this larger picture of health (49). Self-reported health surveys may show a range of health statuses due to social, economic, and environmental variables. In most cases, self-reported health surveys ask, “How would you evaluate your general health…” followed by three to five ratings (poor, medium, fair health condition). Social class and environmental issues including air, noise, and waste pollution may affect health. The combination of air pollution and weather events, like heat waves and cold spells, might impact self-reported health assessments by affecting the body’s thermoregulation system (51–53). It is commonly acknowledged that extreme weather occurrences inherently worsen the impact of air pollution. In particular, heat waves and excessive temperatures during them harm human health, raising the risk of respiratory illness and mortality (52).
Self-reported health status serves as a crucial indicator of population health and well-being. In the context of air pollution, it can provide valuable insights into how people perceive the impact of environmental factors on their health. The relationship between perceived air pollution and self-reported health status is complex and multifaceted. It highlights the critical need for further research into the interplay between air pollution, public perception, and health outcomes, particularly in rapidly developing urban areas like Bangladesh. However, a lack of study exists on the relationship between air pollution and self-reported health status in Bangladesh. By addressing it, we can develop more effective strategies for communicating air pollution risks, promoting protective behaviors, and improving public health in this global environmental challenge.
This research aims to understand how perceived air pollution affects self-reported health in adult Bangladeshis. We evaluated various air pollution-related health concerns from past research when assessing self-reported health status (6, 54–58). Several Bangladeshi air pollution studies have been done (25, 26, 59, 60). However, this is the first study to examine how Bangladesh’s adult population perceives air pollution and self-reports air pollution-related health issues. The findings of this study might facilitate the development of regional and local air pollution mitigation plans.
2 Research methodology
2.1 Research design
A self-reported health survey was developed to evaluate how respondents perceived health issues connected to air pollution. This study continued the earlier one in which we assessed the health issues caused by noise in Dhaka (61). The boundary conditions were age (18 years and older) and residency for at least 3 years in our study areas.
2.2 Study area
As we have already discussed, Dhaka is one of the cities with the worst air quality. Tejgaon, Darus Salam, Mirpur-1, and Farmgate were the research areas in Dhaka (Figure 1). Due to the industrial activity and heavy traffic, the air in Tejgaon, Darus Salam, and Farmgate neighborhoods appeared polluted. However, Mirpur-1 was chosen as a residential neighborhood.
Figure 1
Figure 1. The study area.
Figure 1 is being embedded below here.
2.3 Survey tool
The questionnaire’s draft was prepared by following earlier research (6, 54–58). Before developing the final questionnaire, a pilot survey was also carried out, but it was excluded from the final analysis. Four elements made up the final questionnaire (available in both local Bangla and English): sociodemographic data, perceived local air pollution, individual perspectives on air pollution, and the health issues associated with air pollution. In the last phase, participants self-reported their health state. They were asked to “please respond to the following health concerns compared to 3–5 years ago” concerning any health disorders connected to air pollution. It listed 13 health issues caused by air pollution, including shortness of breath (especially when exercising), breathing difficulty even when not exercising, respiratory tract irritation and inflammation (coughing), chest tightness, pain when inhaling deeply, sinus issues, heart disease, lung cancer, aggravated asthma, type 2 diabetes, systemic inflammation, dementia, and wheezing and coughing (6, 54–58) with “About the same/Better/Worst” option. A score of one was given for a positive answer, while a score of 0.50 and 0 were given for a neutral and negative response, respectively.
2.4 Sampling
Between mid-July and mid-August 2022, a face-to-face survey was conducted. The questionnaire was made using Google Forms. The sample strategy used in this investigation was non-probability convenience sampling. People living in our selected areas were selected based on our convenience to contact. For this perception-based study, Morgan’s Table indicated that a minimum sample size of 384 people (95% Confidence Interval) was necessary (62). We successfully reached 412 respondents. After data processing, however, the final survey comprised 398 participants.
2.5 Data analysis
Python (version 2.7; Beaverton, OR 97008, USA) and RStudio (version 1.2.5042; Boston, MA, USA) (63, 64) were utilized for data administration and analysis. All statistical analyses were conducted using a 95% confidence interval. When relevant, descriptive analyses (frequency and percentage) were calculated. Like previous studies for noise pollution (61), the average of the 13 scores for health issues linked to air pollution was used to generate the overall score for health problems connected to air pollution. We have examined the factors of self-reported total air pollution-related health concerns with linear regression. We have undertaken further multiple linear regression analysis using sociodemographic factors of significance (in linear regression analysis).
2.6 Ethical issue
This research has been approved by the Disaster Management & Resilience department, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Dhaka, Bangladesh. This study is part of approved research from the Department of Disaster Management & Resilience, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Dhaka, Bangladesh. In addition, it was approved by the Institute of Disaster Management and Vulnerability Studies research ethics review committee (ERC-02/02/2021), University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Following the human subject, it has maintained all related ethical concerns. Consent was taken. No incentives were given to take the survey.
3 Results
3.1 Air pollution-related health problem by sociodemographic profile
The total health issue brought on by air pollution is segmented by sociodemographic data in Table 1. Many people we studied were between 36 and 45, 18 and 25, and 46 and 55. Participants were male at 67% and female at around 33%. Most of them were unmarried and were living with their families. Both high-rise and low-rise buildings housed a large number of people. Many claimed to have a job and less than a tertiary degree in employment and education level, respectively.
Table 1
Table 1. Overall health issue resulting from air pollution by sociodemographic profile (n = 398).
When compared to the youngest age group (18–25 years), the older age groups (46–55 and >55 years) reported a considerably higher number of health issues connected to air pollution. Regarding marital status, those who were unmarried reported much less hardships. Residents of Mirpur’s residential neighborhood had noticeably fewer health issues caused by air pollution (Table 2).
Table 2
Table 2. Overall health issue resulting from air pollution by sociodemographic profile (multiple linear regression analysis).
3.2 Air pollution in the locality
Appendix Table 1 shows that most participants (90%) reported air pollution environments in the neighborhood from various sources. The majority of them (42%) reported mixed kinds, followed by construction activities (31%) and all sorts of air pollution (30%) prevalent in the Dhaka city. Many people had the belief that local air pollution could be reduced. About 57% of respondents say the monsoon season has the least air pollution. About half of people thought that indoor air pollution existed.
People who stated that their local area had high levels of air pollution due to construction and the combustion of fossil fuels showed substantial health problems. Participants who believed air pollution could not be controlled showed high suffering. The number of health issues caused by air pollution was much higher among people who identified winter as the most polluted season. According to Appendix Table 2, 55% of the participants in the survey thought that air pollution was responsible for illnesses in their friends and family. Additionally, they believed that air pollution was harmful to health. Many wanted to participate in campaigns to reduce air pollution but were unaware of them. More than 80% of respondents said there should be more information accessible about air pollution. According to about 59% of respondents, only government and non-government groups should not be in charge of limiting air pollution; however, they also think family and friends may help. About 80% concurred that taking precautions against air pollution might lessen health risks. However, many of them either never used masks or did not wear them whenever they went outside. Many also consented to paying higher taxes and other fees to lower air pollution. However, almost 55% did not notice the daily weather prediction before heading outside.
Participants unwilling to engage in an awareness campaign on air pollution experienced intense suffering. Participants responded that no further information should be made available to the general public regarding information relating to air pollution, which reported noticeably high suffering. Less suffering was seen in respondents who did not think that only governments and non-governmental organizations should be in charge of reducing air pollution. However, those who did not think that friends and family might help minimize air pollution reported suffering considerably higher rates. Respondents who thought taking precautions against air pollution is crucial to lowering health risks reported less suffering. Similarly, less suffering was reported when wearing a mask and going outside.
4 Discussion
We evaluated the association between self-reported air pollution-related health issues, sociodemographic data, and perceived air pollution in the locality. We noticed that participants’ age group, marital status, and location were all significant factors in air pollution-related health concerns. Earlier studies revealed an association between sociodemographic status and perceived air pollution exposure (37, 65, 66). Several studies examined sociodemographic data to assess self-reported air pollution-related health status (67–69). Similarly, we assessed self-reported noise-related health status based on sociodemographic data (61). We observed that older people reported air pollution-related health concerns, supporting another study that suggested older people may be more sensitive to air pollution (70–72). Air pollution harms older individuals since they often have many chronic illnesses, including high blood pressure, diabetes, and heart disease. Older adults are more likely to be hospitalized when air pollution is excessive. Ageing causes a gradual reduction in physical function, making aged people more vulnerable, fragile, and sensitive. The immune system changes with age, reducing its ability to react to infection and immunization and increasing infectious disease morbidity and mortality in older people (73).
Residential respondents reported less air-pollution-related suffering than industrial and traffic respondents. Residential, industrial, and transportation air pollution levels vary greatly (74–76). Due to industrial, car, and construction pollutants, industrial and traffic regions have greater air pollution levels (74). Residential pollution is lower, although cooking and heating can contribute. Studies reveal that industrial and transportation regions have greater PM, NO2, and SO2 levels than residential areas (74). Air quality monitoring is essential to identify health hazards and minimize pollution. Living near roads and large roadways can significantly increase pollution, stressing the significance of air quality in urban development.
The effectiveness of any policy to control pollutant emissions involves public acceptance that, in turn, necessitates a proper understanding of the primary pollutant emission drivers (39). According to our research, construction is the main source of air pollution. Air pollution is largely caused by construction (77–79). They discharge air pollutants into the atmosphere, including dust, particulate matter, diesel exhaust, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (80–82). Heavy machinery, diesel engines, land clearance, demolition, and rubbish burning cause construction-related air pollution. According to studies, construction materials make up nearly 38% of outdoor air pollution (83). Air quality and public health are affected by these contaminants. Cleaner machinery, dust management, and sustainable building methods reduce construction pollution (84, 85). Construction air pollution must be reduced to safeguard the environment and adjacent residents. Air pollution in Dhaka is largely caused by construction (86).
Rapid urbanization, construction, road digging, and industrial growth in Dhaka add to the issue. The Air Quality Research and Monitoring Centre of Dhaka University’s chemistry department said that dust and smoke cause 50% of the city’s pollution (87). In addition, it has been claimed that mismanaged construction and ageing car exhausts cause this dust. Effective pollution control, sustainable building, and government involvement are needed to reduce construction-related air pollution’s negative impacts on the city’s environment and public health (87). Following a written appeal against air pollution in Dhaka, the High Court issued nine instructions to the Department of Environment and the two municipal corporations in January 2020 (87). The directives included covering trucks and other vehicles carrying sand, soil, or garbage in Dhaka city; covering soil, sand, cement, and stones on construction sites; spraying streets regularly; following tender conditions for road, culvert, carpeting, and digging; and enforcing road transport act, time limits for vehicle movement (87).
This study also examined air pollution attitudes. People with more serious air pollution-related illnesses did not believe their location could manage air pollution. Due to a sickness’s physical and psychological effects, one may lose faith in their potential to heal (88, 89). Diseases can lower self-esteem, making people doubt their skills. Chronic disease can reduce self-esteem and self-efficacy. These encounters can cause anxiety and despair. Negative emotions might hamper rehabilitation, so confront them and get help. Recognizing how the condition affects self-perception and engaging in self-esteem and well-being might help rebuild confidence (89). Many respondents said that winter had the least air pollution, consistent with a prior study at the US embassy in Dhaka (60). They found that winter air pollution is higher and monsoon pollution is lowest.
We observed that few respondents knew about air pollution-related campaigns, but many were interested. Campaigns against air pollution are vital to increasing awareness and promoting healthier air. These initiatives, generally launched by groups, governments, and health authorities, educate the public about air pollution’s health consequences and encourage action. The Environment & Clean Air Coalition and WHO support the BreatheLife Campaign, which encourages cities and individuals to cut air pollution for better health and a safer climate (90). The UK Clean Air Day promotes air pollution reduction (91). Air pollution affects health and the environment; thus, campaigns provide information, tactics, and policies. Such actions are essential for a shared effort to clean the air and improve health. Increasing public air pollution knowledge is also important. Air pollution causes many diseases and deaths globally. This issue needs public knowledge and understanding (92). Accessible information helps people understand air pollution, its causes, health effects, and solutions. Anthropogenic environmental contamination is tough to eliminate, but a close partnership between authorities, bodies, and healthcare providers might fix it. Governments should educate people and involve specialists to control the problem’s rise (92). Informative material inspires individuals to decrease pollution, advocate for cleaner air regulations, and act. By making such information available, we can improve air quality, public health, and the environment. Our study population thought they should minimize air pollution, not only governments or NGOs. Our participants did not always wear masks outside, where air pollution is prevalent. Participants using masks suffered less from air pollution. Wearing masks can reduce air pollution and its health impacts (93). N95 respirators and pollution masks protect against airborne particulates and contaminants to varied degrees (94). Masks filter out particles and contaminants, especially during heavy air pollution. According to research, masks help reduce PM2.5 exposure, especially in metropolitan locations with strong traffic emissions (93). However, mask selection and fit affect effectiveness. Masks can reduce air pollution’s health risks but should be used with other interventions.
Air pollution reduction requires a comprehensive approach. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has released the Air Pollution (Control) Rules (APCR), 2022, as a gazette notice, intending to combat the severe air pollution in Bangladesh (95). However, the policy must be monitored and implemented. The authority should work with central government, local governments, educational institutions, private offices, health professionals, environmental experts, disaster management practitioners, and community leaders to spread knowledge, promote air pollution awareness, and implement preventive measures. Along with frequent air pollution inspections, governments must organize campaigns, social mobilization, and communication about air pollution management techniques to educate and teach communities to tackle this major public health issue. Television and social media may broadcast educational projects like short films and case studies regarding community-level air pollution management. Social media has become a major source of information for Bangladeshis (96). These methods must incorporate literacy and cognitive comprehension while designing and implementing them (97). The authorities must equip and train its staff and other stakeholders to mitigate this major public health concern. To create effective air pollution mitigation methods, authorities, researchers, companies, and communities must work together. The government should fine air polluters more. They may also perform several studies to determine new air pollution remedies. Beijing, infamous for its air pollution, has maintained stable GDP growth for the previous three decades despite investing in and controlling air quality improvement projects, which have improved air quality by 50% (95, 98). It was achieved through cost-effective planning and determined execution. In addition, several studies have recommended that urban vegetation reduce air pollution (99, 100).
5 Limitations
The study has some limitations that should be noted when evaluating the results. We used self-reported health assessments of Bangladesh’s adult population, not clinical diagnoses. Thus, study findings should be viewed carefully. Second, it employed non-probability sampling with a questionnaire survey that may be biased. Even if the survey pattern is anonymous, respondents may consider socially acceptable responses. Third, it only measured perceived air pollution, which may not reflect pollution levels. However, this exploratory study may help Bangladeshi authorities and other affected people reduce air pollution.
6 Conclusion
It is the first research in Bangladesh to examine how individuals perceive their health concerning air pollution. The busy streets of Dhaka, once filled with the vibrant energy of millions, now bear witness to an invisible threat that looms over its residents. Our study unveils a reality: air pollution is not just an environmental concern but a pressing public health crisis that demands immediate attention. Our findings show a picture of vulnerability increasing with age. The older generations, who have witnessed Dhaka’s rapid transformation, now face the harshest consequences of its progress. The age groups 46–55 and above 55 reported significantly higher health issues related to air pollution than their younger counterparts. This disparity calls for targeted interventions to protect our elders, the bearers of our cultural wisdom. The study reveals a cruel irony: winter, traditionally a season of joy and festivities in Bangladesh, emerges as the most polluted period. The air that should bring relief instead carries a higher burden of pollutants, exacerbating health issues. Conversely, the monsoon season offers a brief respite, with lower pollution levels reported. This seasonal variation underscores the need for dynamic, season-specific strategies to combat air pollution. Most participants recognize the health hazards of air pollution and express a willingness to take action. However, a critical gap exists between awareness and action. Despite understanding the risks, many residents do not consistently use protective measures like masks. This disconnect highlights the urgent need for comprehensive public education campaigns that inform and motivate behavioral changes. Our study confirms that simple actions can make a significant difference. Participants who regularly wore masks when outdoors reported fewer health issues. This finding emphasizes the importance of promoting and facilitating protective gear as a defense against air pollution. The path forward is clear yet challenging. We must implement stringent air quality regulations to curb pollution at its source. We need to launch targeted public health initiatives focusing on vulnerable age groups. Authority must develop urban planning strategies prioritizing green spaces and sustainable transportation. We should create community engagement programs to bridge awareness and action gaps. While our study sheds light on the current situation, it also illuminates paths for future research. We need to delve deeper into the long-term health effects of chronic exposure to air pollution, the economic impacts of pollution-related health issues on Dhaka’s economy, innovative technological solutions for air quality improvement, and comparative studies across major South Asian cities to identify best practices.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Institute of Disaster Management and Vulnerability Studies research ethics review committee (ERC-02/02/2021), University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Informed consent was taken.
Author contributions
MR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AH: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MC: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EA: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MI: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AI: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The APC was partially supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (grant: KFU 241964).
Acknowledgments
The authors strongly appreciate professionals for their perceptive observations and suggestions. Moreover, the authors would like to express greetings for the participants for their support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1382471/full#supplementary-material
References
1. World Health Organization . (2016). Ambient air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. World Health Organization. p. 121. Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250141 (Accessed August 29, 2023).
2. Hänninen, O, Knol, AB, Jantunen, M, Lim, T-A, Conrad, A, Rappolder, M, et al. Environmental burden of disease in Europe: assessing nine risk factors in six countries. Environ Health Perspect. (2014) 122:439–46. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206154
3. Clark, C, and Paunovic, K. WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and quality of life, wellbeing and mental Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:2400. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112400
4. Fuller, R, Landrigan, PJ, Balakrishnan, K, Bathan, G, Bose-O’Reilly, S, Brauer, M, et al. Pollution and health: a progress update. Lancet Planet Health. (2022) 6:e535–47. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0
6. WHO (2023) Air pollution. Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution (Accessed August 22, 2023).
7. Lelieveld, J, Evans, JS, Fnais, M, Giannadaki, D, and Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature. (2015) 525:367–71. doi: 10.1038/nature15371
8. Fiore, AM, Naik, V, and Leibensperger, EM. Air quality and climate connections. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. (2015) 65:645–85. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1040526
9. Kumar, P, Khare, M, Harrison, RM, Bloss, WJ, Lewis, AC, Coe, H, et al. New directions: air pollution challenges for developing megacities like Delhi. Atmos Environ. (2015) 122:657–61. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.032
10. Mukherjee, A, and Agrawal, M. World air particulate matter: sources, distribution and health effects. Environ Chem Lett. (2017) 15:283–309. doi: 10.1007/s10311-017-0611-9
11. Kumar, P, de Fatima, AM, Ynoue, R, Fornaro, A, Dias de Freitas, E, Martins, J, et al. New directions: from biofuels to wood stoves: the modern and ancient air quality challenges in the megacity of Sao Paulo. Atmos Environ. (2016) 140:364–9. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.059
12. Sicard, P, Agathokleous, E, Anenberg, SC, De Marco, A, Paoletti, E, and Calatayud, V. Trends in urban air pollution over the last two decades: a global perspective. Sci Total Environ. (2023) 858:160064. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160064
13. Tibbetts, JH . Air quality and climate change: a delicate balance. Environ Health Perspect. (2015) 123:A148–53. doi: 10.1289/ehp.123-A148
14. Arfanuzzaman, M, and Dahiya, B. Sustainable urbanization in Southeast Asia and beyond: challenges of population growth, land use change, and environmental health. Growth Chang. (2019) 50:725–44. doi: 10.1111/grow.12297
15. Flood-Garibay, JA, Angulo-Molina, A, and Méndez-Rojas, MÁ. Particulate matter and ultrafine particles in urban air pollution and their effect on the nervous system. Environ Sci Process Impacts. (2023) 25:704–26. doi: 10.1039/D2EM00276K
16. Taghizadeh, F, Mokhtarani, B, and Rahmanian, N. Air pollution in Iran: the current status and potential solutions. Environ Monit Assess. (2023) 195:737. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11296-5
17. Singh, R, Singh, V, Gautam, AS, Gautam, S, Sharma, M, Soni, PS, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of satellite-based aerosol optical depths, angstrom exponent, single scattering albedo, and ultraviolet-aerosol index over five polluted and less-polluted cities of northern India: impact of urbanization and climate change. Aerosol Sci Eng. (2023) 7:131–49. doi: 10.1007/s41810-022-00168-z
18. Adami, G, Pontalti, M, Cattani, G, Rossini, M, Viapiana, O, Orsolini, G, et al. Association between long-term exposure to air pollution and immune-mediated diseases: a population-based cohort study. RMD Open. (2022) 8:e002055. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002055
19. Grimmond, S, Bouchet, V, Molina, LT, Baklanov, A, Tan, J, Schlünzen, KH, et al. Integrated urban hydrometeorological, climate and environmental services: concept, methodology and key messages. Urban Clim. (2020) 33:100623. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100623
20. Tajmim, T, and Rahman, S. (2023) Air pollution keeps shortening Bangladeshi people’s lives as density grows: study. Bus Stand. Available online at: https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/health/air-pollution-keeps-shortening-bangladeshi-peoples-lives-density-grows-study (Accessed August 30, 2023).
21. The Air Quality Life Index (AQLI) . (n.d.). AQLI. Available online at: https://aqli.epic.uchicago.edu/the-index/ (Accessed August 30, 2023).
22. Begum, BA, and Hopke, PK. Identification of sources from chemical characterization of fine particulate matter and assessment of ambient air quality in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Aerosol Air Qual Res. (2019) 19:118–28. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.12.0604
23. Guttikunda, SK, and Kopakka, RV. Source emissions and health impacts of urban air pollution in Hyderabad, India. Air Qual Atmos Health. (2014) 7:195–207. doi: 10.1007/s11869-013-0221-z
24. Rahman, MM, Begum, BA, Hopke, PK, Nahar, K, and Thurston, GD. Assessing the PM2.5 impact of biomass combustion in megacity Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environ Pollut. (2020) 264:114798. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114798
25. Begum, BA, Biswas, SK, Markwitz, A, and Hopke, PK. Identification of sources of fine and coarse particulate matter in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Aerosol Air Qual Res. (2010) 10:345–53. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2009.12.0082
26. Begum, BA, Biswas, SK, and Hopke, PK. Impact of banning of two-stroke engines on airborne particulate matter concentrations in Dhaka, Bangladesh. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. (2006) 56:85–9. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464430
27. Alam, DS, Chowdhury, MA, Siddiquee, AT, Ahmed, S, and Clemens, JD. Prevalence and determinants of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Bangladesh. COPD J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. (2015) 12:658–67. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2015.1041101
28. Khan, R, Konishi, S, Ng, CFS, Umezaki, M, Kabir, AF, Tasmin, S, et al. Association between short-term exposure to fine particulate matter and daily emergency room visits at a cardiovascular hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ. (2019) 646:1030–6. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.288
29. Begum, BA, Biswas, SK, and Hopke, PK. Key issues in controlling air pollutants in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Atmos Environ. (2011) 45:7705–13. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.022
30. WHO (2023). How air pollution is destroying our health. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/how-air-pollution-is-destroying-our-health (Accessed August 30, 2023).
31. Riley, R, de Preux, L, Capella, P, Mejia, C, Kajikawa, Y, and de Nazelle, A. How do we effectively communicate air pollution to change public attitudes and behaviours? A review. Sustain Sci. (2021) 16:2027–47. doi: 10.1007/s11625-021-01038-2
32. Marquart, H, Ueberham, M, and Schlink, U. Extending the dimensions of personal exposure assessment: a methodological discussion on perceived and measured noise and air pollution in traffic. J Transp Geogr. (2021) 93:103085. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103085
33. Gössling, S, Humpe, A, Litman, T, and Metzler, D. Effects of perceived traffic risks, noise, and exhaust smells on bicyclist behaviour: an economic evaluation. Sustain For. (2019) 11:408. doi: 10.3390/su11020408
34. Hou, Y, Gao, M, Huang, L, and Wang, Q. Air pollution reduces interpersonal trust: the roles of emotion and emotional susceptibility. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:5631. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115631
35. Elliott, SJ, Cole, DC, Krueger, P, Voorberg, N, and Wakefield, S. The power of perception: Health risk attributed to air pollution in an urban industrial Neighbourhood. Risk Anal. (1999) 19:621–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00433.x
36. Schmitz, S, Weiand, L, Becker, S, Niehoff, N, Schwartzbach, F, and von Schneidemesser, E. An assessment of perceptions of air quality surrounding the implementation of a traffic-reduction measure in a local urban environment. Sustain Cities Soc. (2018) 41:525–37. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.011
37. Egondi, T, Kyobutungi, C, Ng, N, Muindi, K, Oti, S, De, VSV, et al. Community perceptions of air pollution and related health risks in Nairobi slums. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2013) 10:4851–68. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10104851
38. Guo, Y, Liu, F, Lu, Y, Mao, Z, Lu, H, Wu, Y, et al. Factors affecting parent’s perception on air quality—from the individual to the community level. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2016) 13:493. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050493
39. Maione, M, Mocca, E, Eisfeld, K, Kazepov, Y, and Fuzzi, S. Public perception of air pollution sources across Europe. Ambio. (2021) 50:1150–8. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01450-5
40. Liao, X, Tu, H, Maddock, JE, Fan, S, Lan, G, Wu, Y, et al. Residents’ perception of air quality, pollution sources, and air pollution control in Nanchang, China. Atmos Pollut Res. (2015) 6:835–41. doi: 10.5094/APR.2015.092
41. Orru, K, Nordin, S, Harzia, H, and Orru, H. The role of perceived air pollution and health risk perception in health symptoms and disease: a population-based study combined with modelled levels of PM10. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. (2018) 91:581–9. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1303-x
42. Cesaroni, G, Badaloni, C, Porta, D, Forastiere, F, and Perucci, CA. Comparison between various indices of exposure to traffic-related air pollution and their impact on respiratory health in adults. Occup Environ Med. (2008) 65:683–90. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.037846
43. Oltra, C, and Sala, R. Communicating the risks of urban air pollution to the public. A study of urban air pollution information services. Rev Int Contam Ambient. (2015) 31:361–75.
44. Zhu, J, Lu, C, and Wei, Z. Perception of air pollution and the evaluation of local governments’ environmental governance: an empirical study on China. Atmosfera. (2023) 14:212. doi: 10.3390/atmos14020212
45. Reames, TG, and Bravo, MA. People, place and pollution: investigating relationships between air quality perceptions, health concerns, exposure, and individual- and area-level characteristics. Environ Int. (2019) 122:244–55. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.013
46. Oltra, C, and Sala, R. Perception of risk from air pollution and reported behaviors: a cross-sectional survey study in four cities. J Risk Res. (2018) 21:869–84. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2016.1264446
47. Ramírez, AS, Ramondt, S, Van Bogart, K, and Perez-Zuniga, R. Public awareness of air pollution and Health threats: challenges and opportunities for communication strategies to improve environmental Health literacy. J Health Commun. (2019) 24:75–83. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1574320
48. Siddique, AB, Sujan, MSH, Ahmed, S, Ishadi, KS, Tasnim, R, Islam, MS, et al. Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding air pollution and health effects among general people: a multi-divisional cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. PLoS One. (2024) 19:e0305075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305075
49. Idler, EL, and Benyamini, Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. (1997) 38:21–37. doi: 10.2307/2955359
50. Ou, JY, Peters, JL, Levy, JI, Bongiovanni, R, Rossini, A, and Scammell, MK. Self-rated health and its association with perceived environmental hazards, the social environment, and cultural stressors in an environmental justice population. BMC Public Health. (2018) 18:970. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5797-7
51. Deng, Q, Zhao, J, Liu, W, and Li, Y. Heatstroke at home: prediction by thermoregulation modeling. Build Environ. (2018) 137:147–56. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.017
52. Grigorieva, E, and Lukyanets, A. Combined effect of hot weather and outdoor air pollution on respiratory Health: literature review. Atmosfera. (2021) 12:790. doi: 10.3390/atmos12060790
53. Zhao, J, Wang, Y, Ou, D, Wang, H, Li, Y, and Deng, Q. Predicting survival time for cold exposure by thermoregulation modeling. Build Environ. (2024) 249:111127. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111127
54. Lee, B-J, Kim, B, and Lee, K. Air pollution exposure and cardiovascular disease. Toxicol Res. (2014) 30:71–5. doi: 10.5487/TR.2014.30.2.071
55. WHO (2023). Environment and health EURO. Available online at: https://www.who.int/europe/health-topics/environmental-health (Accessed August 22, 2023)
56. Al-Kindi, SG, Brook, RD, Biswal, S, and Rajagopalan, S. Environmental determinants of cardiovascular disease: lessons learned from air pollution. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2020) 17:656–72. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0371-2
57. Cohen, AJ, Ross Anderson, H, Ostro, B, Pandey, KD, Krzyzanowski, M, Künzli, N, et al. The global burden of disease due to outdoor air pollution. J Toxicol Environ Health A. (2005) 68:1301–7. doi: 10.1080/15287390590936166
58. EEA . (2023). Ηow air pollution affects our health. Available online at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/air-pollution/eow-it-affects-our-health (Accessed August 22, 2023)
59. Chowdhury, Z, Le, LT, Masud, AA, Chang, KC, Alauddin, M, Hossain, M, et al. Quantification of indoor air pollution from using Cookstoves and estimation of its health effects on adult women in Northwest Bangladesh. Aerosol Air Qual Res. (2012) 12:463–75. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2011.10.0161
60. Sarwar, G, Hogrefe, C, Henderson, BH, Foley, K, Mathur, R, Murphy, B, et al. Characterizing variations in ambient PM2.5 concentrations at the U.S. embassy in Dhaka, Bangladesh using observations and the CMAQ modeling system. Atmos Environ. (2023) 296:119587. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119587
61. Rahman, MM, Tasnim, F, Quader, MA, Bhuiyan, MN-U-I, Sakib, MS, Tabassum, R, et al. Perceived noise pollution and self-reported Health status among adult population of Bangladesh. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:2394. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042394
62. Krejcie, RV, and Morgan, DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas. (1970) 30:607–10. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308
63. RStudio (n.d.). Open source & professional software for data science teams. Available online at: https://rstudio.com/ (Accessed January 15, 2021).
64. Welcome to Python.org. (n.d.). Python.org. Available online at: https://www.python.org/ (Accessed January 15, 2021).
65. Badland, HM, and Duncan, MJ. Perceptions of air pollution during the work-related commute by adults in Queensland, Australia. Atmos Environ. (2009) 43:5791–5. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.050
66. Piro, FN, Madsen, C, Næss, Ø, Nafstad, P, and Claussen, B. A comparison of self reported air pollution problems and GIS-modeled levels of air pollution in people with and without chronic diseases. Environ Health. (2008) 7:9. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-9
67. Bano, R, and Khayyam, U. Industrial air pollution and self-reported respiratory and irritant health effects on adjacent residents: a case study of Islamabad industrial estate (IEI). Air Qual Atmos Health. (2021) 14:1709–22. doi: 10.1007/s11869-021-01051-5
68. Al Ahad, MA, Demšar, U, Sullivan, F, and Kulu, H. Does long-term air pollution exposure affect self-reported Health and limiting long term illness disproportionately for ethnic minorities in the UK? A census-based individual level analysis. Appl Spat Anal Policy. (2022) 15:1557–82. doi: 10.1007/s12061-022-09471-1
69. Abed Al Ahad, M, Demšar, U, Sullivan, F, and Kulu, H. The spatial–temporal effect of air pollution on individuals’ reported health and its variation by ethnic groups in the United Kingdom: a multilevel longitudinal analysis. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23:897. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15853-y
70. Health I on U . (2020). Air pollution and older people – reports. Impact Urban Health. Available online at: https://urbanhealth.org.uk/insights/reports/air-pollution-and-older-people (Accessed August 27, 2023)
71. Simoni, M, Baldacci, S, Maio, S, Cerrai, S, Sarno, G, and Viegi, G. Adverse effects of outdoor pollution in the elderly. J Thorac Dis. (2015) 7:34–45. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.12.10
72. Andrade, A, D’Oliveira, A, De Souza, LC, ACR, B, De, F, Dominski, FH, et al. Effects of air pollution on the Health of older adults during physical activities: mapping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2023) 20:3506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043506
73. Poland, GA, Ovsyannikova, IG, Kennedy, RB, Lambert, ND, and Kirkland, JL. A systems biology approach to the effect of aging, immunosenescence and vaccine response. Curr Opin Immunol. (2014) 29:62–8. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.04.005
74. Jung, C, Alqassimi, N, and El Samanoudy, G. The comparative analysis of the indoor air pollutants in occupied apartments at residential area and industrial area in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Front Built Environ. (2022) 8:998858. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2022.998858
75. Alharbi, BH, Alhazmi, HA, and Aldhafeeri, ZM. Air quality of work, residential, and traffic areas during the COVID-19 lockdown with insights to improve air quality. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020727
76. Zahra, SI, Iqbal, MJ, Ashraf, S, Aslam, A, Ibrahim, M, Yamin, M, et al. Comparison of ambient air quality among industrial and residential areas of a typical south Asian City. Atmosfera. (2022) 13:1168. doi: 10.3390/atmos13081168
77. Joseph, J, Patil, RS, and Gupta, SK. Estimation of air pollutant emission loads from construction and operational activities of a port and harbour in Mumbai, India. Environ Monit Assess. (2009) 159:85–98. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0614-x
78. Huang, K, Zhuang, G, Lin, Y, Wang, Q, Fu, JS, Fu, Q, et al. How to improve the air quality over megacities in China: pollution characterization and source analysis in Shanghai before, during, and after the 2010 world expo. Atmos Chem Phys. (2013) 13:5927–42. doi: 10.5194/acp-13-5927-2013
79. Mannan, M, and Al-Ghamdi, SG. Indoor air quality in buildings: a comprehensive review on the factors influencing air pollution in residential and commercial structure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:3276. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063276
80. de Moraes, RJB, Costa, DB, and Araújo, IPS. Particulate matter concentration from construction sites: concrete and masonry works. J Environ Eng. (2016) 142:05016004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001136
81. Wieser, AA, Scherz, M, Passer, A, and Kreiner, H. Challenges of a healthy built environment: air pollution in construction industry. Sustain For. (2021) 13:10469. doi: 10.3390/su131810469
82. Sekhavati, E, and Yengejeh, RJ. Particulate matter exposure in construction sites is associated with health effects in workers. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1130620. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130620
83. Tribune, Dhaka . (2020). Study: construction the leading cause of outdoor pollution. Dhaka Trib. Available online at: https://www.dhakatribune.com/science-technology-environment/environment/234522/study-construction-the-leading-cause-of-outdoor (Accessed August 27, 2023).
84. Zuo, J, Rameezdeen, R, Hagger, M, Zhou, Z, and Ding, Z. Dust pollution control on construction sites: awareness and self-responsibility of managers. J Clean Prod. (2017) 166:312–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.027
85. Tao, G, Feng, J, Feng, H, Feng, H, and Zhang, K. Reducing construction dust pollution by planning construction site layout. Buildings. (2022) 12:531. doi: 10.3390/buildings12050531
86. Sultana, F. (2022). Development projects and air pollution. Available online at: https://bangladeshpost.net/posts/development-projects-and-air-pollution-79830 (Accessed August 27, 2023).
87. Mahmud, I. (2022). Air quality worst due to neglect by govt agencies. Prothomalo. Available online at: https://en.prothomalo.com/environment/pollution/air-quality-worst-due-to-neglect-by-govt-agencies (Accessed August 27, 2023).
88. Groskop, V. (2023). My Covid-era confidence crisis: how to regain your sense of self, hope and happiness. The Guardian. Available online at: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2023/may/31/my-covid-confidence-crisis-how-to-regain-your-sense-of-self-health-and-happiness (Accessed August 28, 2023).
89. Bedrov, A, and Bulaj, G. Improving self-esteem with motivational quotes: opportunities for digital Health Technologies for People with Chronic Disorders. Front Psychol. (2018) 9:2126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02126
90. BreatheLife . (2023) BreatheLife – a global campaign for clean air. BreatheLife2030. Available online at: https://breathelife2030.org/ (Accessed August 28, 2023)
91. Action for Clean Air . (2023). Clean air day. Action Clean Air. Available online at: http://www.actionforcleanair.org.uk/campaigns/clean-air-day (Accessed August 28, 2023)
92. Manisalidis, I, Stavropoulou, E, Stavropoulos, A, and Bezirtzoglou, E. Environmental and Health impacts of air pollution: a review. Front Public Health. (2020) 8:14. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014
93. Kodros, JK, O’Dell, K, Samet, JM, L’Orange, C, Pierce, JR, and Volckens, J. Quantifying the Health benefits of face masks and respirators to mitigate exposure to severe air pollution. GeoHealth. (2021) 5:e2021GH000482. doi: 10.1029/2021GH000482
94. Tultrairatana, S, and Phansuea, P. Symptoms related to air pollution, mask-wearing and associated factors: a cross-sectional study among OPD pollution clinic patients in Bangkok, Thailand. J Health Res. (2021) 36:1058–67. doi: 10.1108/JHR-11-2020-0548
95. Rana, MM . (2023). Will the new air pollution control rules save us? Dly Star. Available online at: https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/views/news/will-the-new-air-pollution-control-rules-save-us-3238271 (Accessed August 28, 2023).
96. Rahman, MS, Karamehic-Muratovic, A, Baghbanzadeh, M, Amrin, M, Zafar, S, Rahman, NN, et al. Climate change and dengue fever knowledge, attitudes and practices in Bangladesh: a social media–based cross-sectional survey. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. (2020) 115:85–93. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa093
97. Abir, T, Ekwudu, O, Kalimullah, NA, Yazdani, DMN-A, Mamun, AA, Basak, P, et al. Dengue in Dhaka, Bangladesh: hospital-based cross-sectional KAP assessment at Dhaka north and Dhaka South City corporation area. PLoS One. (2021) 16:e0249135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249135
98. Wang, W, Wu, F, and Zhang, F. Environmental city-regionalism in China: war against air pollution in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Trans Plan Urban Res. (2023) 2:132–48. doi: 10.1177/27541223221144595
99. Barwise, Y, and Kumar, P. Designing vegetation barriers for urban air pollution abatement: a practical review for appropriate plant species selection. Npj Clim Atmos Sci. (2020) 3:1–19. doi: 10.1038/s41612-020-0115-3
100. Diener, A, and Mudu, P. How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces’ mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective - with implications for urban planning. Sci Total Environ. (2021) 796:148605. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148605
Keywords: air pollution exposure, perception, self-reported health status, Dhaka city, Bangladesh
Citation: Rahman MM, Hasanuzzaman ABM, Chisty MA, Alam E, Islam MK and Islam ARMT (2025) Perceived-air pollution and self-reported health status: a study on air pollution-prone urban area of Bangladesh. Front. Public Health. 13:1382471. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1382471
Edited by:
Suresh Pandian Elumalai, Indian Institute of Technology Dhanbad, IndiaReviewed by:
Jinping Zhao, Central South University Forestry and Technology, ChinaGabriel O Dida, Technical University of Kenya, Kenya
Copyright © 2025 Rahman, Hasanuzzaman, Chisty, Alam, Islam and Islam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Md Mostafizur Rahman, bW9zdGFmaXp1ckBidXAuZWR1LmJk