Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Injury Prevention and Control
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1549131
This article is part of the Research Topic Road Traffic Injury Prevention and Control View all 12 articles

Editorial for the Special Issue: "Advances in Road Traffic Injury Prevention and Control"

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
  • 2 Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • 3 Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This editorial synthesizes the contributions of the eleven articles in this issue, which offer valuable evidence to inform future policy, practice, and research priorities in the field of road safety.Several contributions examine RTI morbidity or mortality trends in broader contexts. Berheto et al. present a three-decade analysis of injury data in Ethiopia, highlighting a substantial decline in incidence and mortality but revealing inter-regional disparities that warrant localized prevention efforts. Their study underscores that, despite national progress, injuries remain a public health priority, requiring sustained and context-specific interventions. Meanwhile, Du et al. employ an age-period-cohort analysis in Jiangsu Province, China, documenting declining mortality rates for certain injuries, including those from road traffic crashes, yet noting a rise in unintentional falls. This intricate evolution underscores the importance of continuous surveillance to modify strategies as injury profiles shift over time.Methodological advances improve our capacity to understand and prevent severe outcomes. Xiao et al. compare a rare events logistic regression model with a classic logit model to predict fatal crashes. Their findings demonstrate that rare event modeling more accurately identifies risk factors of fatal crash, providing a robust analytical tool for policymakers and researchers targeting high-risk conditions. Huang et al. adopts a Bayesian random-parameter spatial logistic model to investigate the effect of emergency medical service (EMS) response time on fatality risk in freeway crashes in China. Their work links shorter EMS response time with lower fatality odds, suggesting that improving prehospital emergency care capacity could be an effective life-saving strategy.Environmental and contextual factors influencing RTIs are also highlighted. Li et al. focus on the effects of ambient temperature on traffic-related fatalities in Jinan, China. They find that both extremely high and low temperatures increase RTI risks, with delayed impacts across different modes of transportation. This research suggests the need to consider climate factors when planning road safety measures, especially as climate change intensifies temperature extremes. Similarly, Kim et al. investigate perceived pedestrian safety and show that while physical features like crosswalks and traffic signages, infrastructure quality, and comfort also shape subjective safety. Pedestrian-centered improvements must therefore consider not only engineering solutions but also user perception, fostering more friendly and secure walking environments.The role of technology as a protective and preventive measure appears in multiple articles. Useche et al. systematically review the use of in-vehicle advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) to prevent car-cyclist collisions. While studies support ADAS benefits, they also reveal potential downsides, such as driver overreliance. The studies also highlight a critical research gap: developing driver-training and awareness strategies to ensure ADAS complements, rather than substitutes for, attentive driving. Booker et al. discuss the Safe System Approach and how technology can help reduce serious RTIs. Their review points to the importance of evidence-based policy, context-specific technology adoption, and careful evaluation to achieve equitable safety gains worldwide.Several articles delve into the behavioral, health system, and psychosocial dimensions of RTIs. Endalew et al. survey drivers of public transportation in Ethiopia, linking RTIs to a range of factors, from alcohol use to poor vehicle maintenance. These findings suggest that interventions cannot rely solely on infrastructure upgrades; rather, improved driver training, stricter enforcement, and better working conditions may be necessary to reduce crashes. Papadakaki et al. shine a spotlight on an often-overlooked consequence of RTIs: mental health impairment. Their review of European evidence shows that psychological repercussions can persist long after the initial trauma and that survivors often receive insufficient mental health support. This reveals a pressing need for integrated trauma care protocols that address both physical and psychological rehabilitation.Focusing on survivors, Ingabire et al. assess the quality of life of road traffic orthopaedic injury victims in Rwanda two years after experiencing the injury. They find persistent functional and psychosocial limitations, emphasizing the value of rehabilitation and longterm support services. Beyond immediate trauma care, enhancing survivor reintegration and autonomy requires coordinated efforts, from policy implementation to health system strengthening. Similarly, while primarily focusing on trends, Du et al. also highlight the significance of targeted interventions that consider age and cohort patterns to protect atrisk populations, such as older adults, who sustain more severe injury outcomes.These articles underscore the multifaceted nature of RTI prevention and control. Their collective insights demonstrate that achieving safer roads involves more than improved vehicles and infrastructure. It requires integrating robust epidemiological surveillance, advanced statistical methods, climate considerations, technology evaluation, driver training, equitable policies, and comprehensive rehabilitation. The Safe System Approach discussed by Booker et al. offers a valuable framework, but its success depends on interdisciplinary collaboration, political commitment, and sustainable resource allocation.Future research should prioritize harmonizing data collection, establishing standardized metrics, and investing in longitudinal studies. Doing so will permit reasonable comparisons of interventions across regions, promoting knowledge transfer between different sociodemographic settings. Moreover, mental health outcomes and survivor quality of life need more attention, ensuring that post-crash care extends beyond EMSs and includes long-term psychosocial support.In conclusion, the articles in this special issue collectively advance our knowledge of RTI epidemiology, risk factors, interventions, and outcomes. Policymakers, researchers, and practitioners need to collaborate to translate these insights into action. Achieving the Sustainable Development Goal of halving global road traffic deaths and injuries by 2030 requires coordinated efforts across sectors. As this issue demonstrates, there is a wealth of evidence to guide these efforts and pave the way toward safer roads and healthier communities.

    Keywords: Road traffic injuries (RTIs), Injury prevention and control, System Approach (SA), Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), multisectorial collaboration

    Received: 20 Dec 2024; Accepted: 24 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Li, Hu and Lee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Qingfeng Li, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.