The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
REVIEW article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Substance Use Disorders and Behavioral Addictions
Volume 12 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1515264
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovations in Recovery Science: Pathways, Policies, and Platforms that Promote Thriving After Addiction View all articles
Workforce Outcomes Among Substance Use Peer Supports: A Scoping Review of Individual and Organizational Influences
Provisionally accepted- 1 Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, United States
- 2 University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
- 3 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
- 4 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- 5 RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, United States
Introduction: Peer recovery support services (PRSS), an expanding component in SUD treatment, are delivered by individuals with lived experience of substance use disorder (SUD). Despite the growing importance of these peers and the unique challenges they face in a developing health profession, limited research has focused on their workforce outcomes. This review aims to map the literature on a) workforce outcomes among peers and b) the individual and organizational contributors to these outcomes. Materials and Methods: We conducted a scoping review of empirical literature from January 1, 1999 to January 26, 2023 on APA PsycINFO ® , Embase ® , CINAHL ® , Web of Science™, and Google Scholar. We also conducted a search of grey literature on institutional websites to locate additional articles. Search strategies targeted terms related to peers (e.g., peer specialist, people with lived experience), workforce outcomes (e.g., burnout, compassion fatigue), and organizational environments (e.g., workplace, volunteer). The review was preregistered with Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C9YNR). Results: Of the 16,361 total articles retrieved, 20 were included after screening, consisting of 9 quantitative, 9 qualitative, and 2 mixed-methods studies. Cross-sectional survey was the most common study design (n = 9). Organizational factors, such as supervisory support and professional development opportunities, were linked to increased job satisfaction and retention while factors such as inadequate compensation and stigma were barriers to workforce sustainability. Individual challenges, including boundaries with clients and a lack of self-care, were associated with burnout and decreased job satisfaction. Conclusions: Results highlight challenges faced by peers in SUD services which limit their ability to sustain well-being and achieve career longevity. Research gaps include the need for longitudinal studies, a clearer understanding of work settings, and an exploration of mediating or moderating factors affecting workforce outcomes. Future efforts to foster a sustainable peer workforce should focus on improving peer workers' well-being through organizational support, professional development, and targeted interventions based on occupational health theories.
Keywords: peers, Peer recovery support services, substance use disorder, workforce development, burnout
Received: 22 Oct 2024; Accepted: 26 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Bell, Watson, Griffin, Castedo De Martell, Kay, Hawk, Ray and Hudson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Dennis Watson, Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.