The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Health Economics
Volume 12 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1474376
Challenges in assessing national radiotherapy costs: application of the ESTRO-HERO model in Spain
Provisionally accepted- 1 Catalonian Cancer Plan, Department of Health, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
- 2 Radiation Oncology Service, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- 3 Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
- 4 Radiation Oncology Service, Institut Català d’Oncologia - Girona, Girona, Spain
- 5 Radiation Oncology Service, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- 6 Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health (Sciensano), Brussels, Belgium
- 7 Radiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- 8 Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
The aim was to estimate the cost of the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in public health care centers in Catalonia (Spain), according to the ESTRO-HERO costing model for 2018.Material and methods: Personnel, equipment, and activity data from 2018 from the 11 RT centers were used, incorporating European mean values adapted to the Catalan context. Secondly, EBRT costs were estimated, incorporating 2023 fractionation technique and scheme usage percentages. Finally, complementary estimates were included: complementary planning examinations, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) fiducial markers, and hospital overhead costs.In 2018, EBRT cost was estimated at EUR 42.2M for all patients in the region. Directly related treatment activities represented 69.0% of the total cost, while support and non-directly related EBRT activities accounted for 20.2% and 10.8% respectively. Mean radical treatment cost varied from €1714 (leukemia) to €4645 (pancreas), and for palliative intent, from €938 (bone metastases) to €1753 (brain metastases). According to the technique used, costs ranged from €1475 (3D conformal) to €3608 (rotational IMRT), and by fractionation scheme, from €1308 (extreme hypofractionation) to €4094 (standard fractionation). Accounting for 2023 complexity levels, mean treatment cost rose by 0.9%, but varied widely by tumor site, with a 13% increase for stomach cancer, and decreases of -15.0%, -24.4%, and -17.2% in myeloma, pancreas, and lung cancer, respectively. Including complementary examinations and hospital overhead costs, mean cost increased by 15.6%.This study provides a first approximation to EBRT cost using time-driven activity-based costing (TD-ABC) in Catalonia showing the feasibility of the assessment. For each indication, average treatment cost increases with the associated complexity. Additionally, costs decrease with hypofractionation schemes, largely due to lower equipment weight in treatment cost. Consequently, the adoption of stereotactic techniques is driving cost decreases. Overall, this model represents a robust tool for analyzing different possible scenarios, including changes in fractionation and complexity.
Keywords: external beam radiotherapy, economic evaluation, Costing model, Time-driven activitybased costing (TD-ABC), value-based healthcare
Received: 01 Aug 2024; Accepted: 18 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Corral, Algara, Muñoz-Montplet, Eraso Urien, Giralt, Defourny, Lievens and Borras. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Julieta Corral, Catalonian Cancer Plan, Department of Health, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.