Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1469439
This article is part of the Research Topic Community Series In Mental-Health-Related Stigma and Discrimination: Prevention, Role, and Management Strategies, Volume III View all 14 articles

Investigating Implicit Bias in Referrals to Relational Psychological Therapies in Mental Health Services: Review and Recommendations

Provisionally accepted
Chenai Mandangu Chenai Mandangu 1Anne Millicent Ramos Anne Millicent Ramos 1Mohona Sengupta Mohona Sengupta 1Rosslyn Bender Rosslyn Bender 2Reem El-Hayani Reem El-Hayani 1Ifrah Hasan Ifrah Hasan 1Hannah Okechukwu Hannah Okechukwu 1Shafeena Anas Shafeena Anas 3Dominik Havsteen-Franklin Dominik Havsteen-Franklin 3*
  • 1 Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • 2 CNWL NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 3 Brunel University London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Timely and appropriate treatment is fundamental in addressing the burden of mental health issues, which significantly impacts individuals, society, and national healthcare systems. This study investigates implicit bias in the referral practices of mental healthcare professionals to community psychological therapies. By systematically reviewing research from 2002 to 2022, the study identifies recurring themes in referral decision-making and evaluates mechanisms contributing to inequitable access to care. The findings are used to inform evidence-based recommendations for bias mitigation strategies, promoting equitable access. An extensive review of relevant papers published from 2002 to 2022 was conducted, focusing on biases, implicit bias, referral practices, and psychological therapies. The search strategy included fulltext screening based on inclusion criteria to identify studies on professional and organisational implicit bias. Thematic synthesis was used to define relationships and bias development within these categories. The search yielded 2964 papers, with 77 undergoing full-text screening, ultimately including 8 in the review. The thematic review revealed bias development mechanisms across five domains: resource allocation, organizational procedures, clinical roles, decision-making, and referral preferences. This study emphasizes critical themes and proposes measures to mitigate bias and prioritize patients' health and well-being in referral practices. The study provides recommendations to support the provision of equitable psychological therapies in mental health services.

    Keywords: thematic review, implicit bias, Indirect discrimination, healthcare, Psychiatry, Influence mapping

    Received: 09 Aug 2024; Accepted: 24 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Mandangu, Ramos, Sengupta, Bender, El-Hayani, Hasan, Okechukwu, Anas and Havsteen-Franklin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Dominik Havsteen-Franklin, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.