Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466150

Acceptability of identification and management of perinatal anxiety: A qualitative interview study with postnatal women

Provisionally accepted
Rose Meades Rose Meades 1*Patricia M. Moran Patricia M. Moran 1Una Hutton Una Hutton 1Rafiyah Khan Rafiyah Khan 2Margaret Maxwell Margaret Maxwell 3Helen Cheyne Helen Cheyne 3Amy Delicate Amy Delicate 4Judy Shakespeare Judy Shakespeare 5Kathryn Hollins Kathryn Hollins 6Kalpa Pisavadia Kalpa Pisavadia 7Kodchawan (Pim) Doungsong Kodchawan (Pim) Doungsong 7Rhiannon Edwards Rhiannon Edwards 7Andrea Sinesi Andrea Sinesi 3Susan Ayers Susan Ayers 1MAP Alliance Study Team MAP Alliance Study Team 1
  • 1 Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • 2 Kings Centre for Military Health Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
  • 3 Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom
  • 4 Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • 5 Retired GP, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 6 Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leatherhead, United Kingdom
  • 7 Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Anxiety in pregnancy and postpartum is highly prevalent but under-recognised and few women receive adequate support or treatment. Identification and management of perinatal anxiety must be acceptable to women in the perinatal period to ensure that women receive appropriate care when needed. We aimed to understand the acceptability to women of how anxiety was identified and managed by healthcare professionals.Method: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 60 women across England and Scotland approximately 10 months after birth. Women were sampled from an existing systematically recruited cohort of 2243 women who recorded mental health throughout pregnancy and after birth. All women met criteria for further assessment of their mental health by a healthcare professional. We analysed the data using a theoretical framework of acceptability of healthcare interventions.Results: Interview data fitted the seven constructs within the theoretical framework of acceptability.Women valued support before professional treatment but were poorly informed about available services. Services which treated women as individuals, which were accessible and in which there was continuity of healthcare professional were endorsed. Experience of poor maternity services increased anxiety and seeing multiple midwives dissuaded women from engaging in conversations about mental health. Having a trusted relationship with a healthcare professional facilitated conversation about and disclosure of mental health problems.Conclusion: Women's experiences would be improved if given the opportunity to form a trusting relationship with a healthcare provider. Interventions offering support before professional treatment may be valued and suitable for some women. Clear information about support services and treatment options available for perinatal mental health problems should be given. Physiological aspects of maternity care impacts women's mental health and trust in services needs to be restored. Findings can be used to inform clinical guidelines and research on acceptable perinatal care pathways in pregnancy and after birth and future research.

    Keywords: perinatal anxiety, perinatal care, perinatal mental health, acceptability, qualitative research pregnancy, Postpartum, Anxiety, screening, assessment, Treatment, Care pathway

    Received: 17 Jul 2024; Accepted: 03 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Meades, Moran, Hutton, Khan, Maxwell, Cheyne, Delicate, Shakespeare, Hollins, Pisavadia, Doungsong, Edwards, Sinesi, Ayers and Study Team. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Rose Meades, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.