Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1465750
This article is part of the Research Topic The Role of Nursing in Public Health Promotion and Education View all 18 articles

The practice, nature and impact of nurse-led type 2 diabetic foot prevention services and educational programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review Authors

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Salford, Salford, North West England, United Kingdom
  • 2 Wears River Trust, Durham, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: To assess the scope of existing practice, nature and impact of nurse-led Type 2 diabetic foot prevention services and educational programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in SSA imposes a heavy burden on current healthcare services. Complications such as foot ulcers create significant costs to patients and healthcare resources. Identifying patients at risk of developing diabetic foot complications and empowering them through diabetes self-management education and support from specialist foot clinics is crucial. However, the availability of such programmes and services in SSA is limited.Inclusion criteria: Studies of nurse led diabetic foot prevention services and/or educational programmes in low to middle income countries in SSA for adults with T2DM, written in English Language, between August 2013 and March 2024 were considered.Methods: Following the standard PRISMA guidelines for conducting and reporting scoping reviews searches were conducted on four electronic databases (CINAHL, ProQuest, MEDLINE and Scopus) and google scholar. Titles and abstracts were screened. All eligible papers were retrieved for full text screening.Ten studies (across 14 papers) were included in the review and all focused-on nurse-led DSME programmes in SSA. There are no specific educational programmes or services led by nurses focussing solely on diabetic foot prevention. Analysis highlighted the components of successful nurse led DSME's that led to positive glycaemic control and selfcare behaviours include: the focus is on behaviour change and the DSME should be coproduced with service users. Theoretical aspects of the DSME are evidence based, structured, interactive, culturally and linguistically appropriate group-based activities. The DSME should be delivered over a period of weeks and sessions should last between 1.5-2hours. Barriers to delivery and participation include the rainy season, stock outs, time and resources needed and a DSME that meets varied levels of literacy and education.There is a heightened need to create nurse-led, co-produced, culturally congruent, frugal, and sustainable education interventions or programmes. There is also a need for diabetic foot screening and foot ulcer prevention services that can run sustainably along with these educational interventions using task shifted, simple, and frugal initiatives.

    Keywords: type 2 diabetes, Nurse-led, Foot prevention, LMIC, sub-Saharan Africa, Chronic disease management, Public Health, Diabetes self-management education (DSME)

    Received: 16 Jul 2024; Accepted: 08 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Sajith, Ackers, Ackers-Johnson, Parker and Stephens. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Melanie Stephens, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, North West England, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.