Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1465206
This article is part of the Research Topic Oral Health Strategies to Achieve Health Equity and Improve Public Health in the U.S. View all articles

Rural-urban differences in dental opioid prescribing among adolescent/young adult and adult Medicaid beneficiaries

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, United States
  • 2 New York University, New York City, New York, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: There are ongoing concerns about opioid prescribing for surgical and non-surgical dental needs among adolescent/young adult and adult patients. Although there are known differences in the overall opioid prescription rates in rural areas compared to urban areas, the contribution of dental opioid prescriptions is still unclear. This study examines factors, including beneficiary-level and county-level characteristics, associated with receiving a dental opioid prescription among those living in rural and urban areas. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study utilized the 2021 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services unredacted Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Analytic Files to examine Medicaid and CHIP adolescent/young adult beneficiaries aged 12 to 20 and adults aged 21 to 64 who are non-dually eligible for Medicare and had a dental visit in 2021. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to predict the odds of receiving a dental opioid prescription. Results: The results of the adolescent/young adult models show that for every percentage point increase in the percentage of non-Hispanic Black residents in a county, the odds of receiving a dental opioid prescription increase by 0.8% in rural areas. However, with every percentage point increase in the Hispanic population, the odds of receiving a dental opioid prescription decrease by 0.3% in rural areas and 0.7% in urban areas. The adult models show that compared to non-Hispanic white beneficiaries, the odds of non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries receiving a dental opioid prescription are 8% higher when residing in rural areas and 18% higher when residing in urban areas, while all other racial and ethnic groups are significantly less likely to receive a dental opioid prescription. With every unit increase in the concentrated disadvantage index, the odds of receiving a dental opioid prescription increase by 17% among rural adults and 24% among urban adults. Discussion: Our findings on rural-urban disparities in opioid prescriptions suggest that prescription patterns in dental settings are significant and inequitable across various beneficiary- and county-level factors and areas of residence. These variations in prescription patterns highlight the known disparities in access to preventive dental care and the need for targeted interventions to address the healthcare needs of rural residents.

    Keywords: dental, opioid, prescribing, Oral Health, Prescription, rural, Urban, Medicaid

    Received: 15 Jul 2024; Accepted: 02 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Shoff, Sheen, Qu and Chalmers. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Carla Shoff, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, United States
    Natalia I. Chalmers, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.