Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456265
This article is part of the Research Topic Vaccine Education and Promotion View all 22 articles

Lessons learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic: Identifying hesitant groups and exploring reasons for vaccination hesitancy, from adolescence to late adulthood

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Transversal Translational Medicine, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
  • 2 Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
  • 3 Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
  • 4 Parkinson Research Clinic, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Strassen, Luxembourg
  • 5 Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
  • 6 Competence Centre for Methodology and Statistics, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The COVID-19 (CoronaVIrus Disease-2019) pandemic highlighted the importance of assessing the rationales behind vaccine hesitancy is for the containment of pandemics. In this nationwide study, representative of the Luxembourgish population, we identified hesitant groups from adolescence to late adulthood and explored their motivations both for and against vaccination. We combined data collected via online surveys for the CON-VINCE (COvid-19 National survey for assessing VIral spread by Non-affected CarriErs) study, 1865 respondents aged 18-84, and for the YAC (Young people And Covid-19) study, 3740 respondents aged 12-29. Data from both studies were harmonized and weighted to ensure a sample representative of Luxembourg’s resident population. The surveys included information on demographic and socio-economic factors as well as vaccination hesitancy. At the time of the survey, 67.0% of respondents had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome COronaVirus-2), while 33.0% of the respondents had not yet been vaccinated. Of those not yet vaccinated, 41.8% of respondents were vaccine hesitant. The most important concerns against vaccination were that the vaccine had not been tested sufficiently (59.4%) and the fear of side effects (52.4%). The most frequent reasons for vaccination were to help society overcome the pandemic (74.8%), and to protect oneself from the consequences of infection with the virus (69.3%). The proportion of unvaccinated respondents unwilling or undecided to get vaccinated was higher in the younger age groups compared to the higher age groups. Our findings contribute to the improvement of public health policy communications, not only for future pandemics as well as for routine vaccination campaigns, this will help reach those unwilling (26.7%) or undecided (15.1%) to be vaccinated, and to help reinforce the strategies that have successfully increased vaccination willingness.

    Keywords: Vaccine education, Health Promotion, Public Health, Vaccination hesitancy, Vaccination willingness, COVID-19, Immunity

    Received: 28 Jun 2024; Accepted: 31 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Pauly, Residori, Bulut, Bulaev, Ghosh, O Sullivan, Fritz, Vaillant, Rommes, Samuel, Satagopam, Krüger and Leist. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Hamid Bulut, Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
    Soumyabrata Ghosh, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
    Joëlle V Fritz, Transversal Translational Medicine, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
    Robin Samuel, Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
    Rejko Krüger, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
    Anja Leist, Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.