Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Aging and Public Health
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1449594
This article is part of the Research Topic AI-Driven Healthcare Delivery, Ageism, and Implications for Older Adults: Emerging Trends and Challenges in Public Health View all articles

Investigating Elderly Users' Willingness to Adopt Wearable Devices by Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (UTAUT2) and the Technology Readiness Index (TRI) Theory

Provisionally accepted
Chengzhen Wu Chengzhen Wu Gyoo G. Lim Gyoo G. Lim *
  • Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: With the continuous advancement of wearable technology, smart wearable devices are increasingly recognized for their value in health monitoring, assessment, and intervention for the elderly, thus promoting intelligent elderly care. This study, based on the theoretical framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) and the Technology Readiness Index (TRI) model, aims to identify and explore the key factors influencing elderly consumers' willingness to adopt smart wearable devices and their impact mechanisms.Method: A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect valid data from 389 elderly respondents.Empirical analysis validated the model's applicability and explored the key factors influencing acceptance.Results: Factors influencing the use of smart wearable devices by the elderly include performance expectancy (β = 0.152, p < 0.001), effort expectancy (β = 0.154, p < 0.001), social influence (β = 0.135, p < 0.05), facilitating conditions (β = 0.126, p < 0.05), hedonic motivation (β = 0.166, p < 0.001), price value (β = 0.182, p < 0.001), and digital health literacy (β = 0.189, p < 0.001).Additionally, optimism (β = 0.208, p < 0.001), innovativeness (β = 0.218, p < 0.001), and discomfort (β = -0.245, p < 0.001) significantly positively influenced performance expectancy, while optimism (β = 0.282, p < 0.001), innovativeness (β = 0.144, p < 0.01), discomfort (β = -0.239, p < 0.001), and insecurity (β = -0.117, p < 0.05) significantly positively influenced effort expectancy. Insecurity did not significantly influence performance expectancy. Performance expectancy and effort expectancy partially mediated the relationship between personality traits (optimism, innovativeness, discomfort, and insecurity) and behavioral intention. Digital health literacy significantly negatively moderated the relationship between performance expectancy and behavioral intention, as well as between effort expectancy and behavioral intention.Discussion: The study confirms that integrating the UTAUT2 model and TRI theory effectively explains the acceptance of smart wearable devices among elderly consumers, emphasizing the importance of enhancing digital health literacy in the design and promotion of smart health devices.The findings provide guidance for developers, increasing the acceptance and usage rate of these devices among the elderly.

    Keywords: Behavioral intention1, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology22, Technology Readiness Index3, Smart Wearable Devices4, Digital health literacy5

    Received: 15 Jun 2024; Accepted: 04 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wu and Lim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Gyoo G. Lim, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.