Examining the diet quality of Canadian adults and the alignment of Canadian front-of-pack labelling regulations with other front-of-pack labelling systems and dietary guidelines
- 1Department of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 2Joannah and Brian Lawson Centre for Child Nutrition, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 3Sorbonne Paris Nord University, INSERM, INRAE, CNAM, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center, University of Paris (CRESS), Bobigny, France
- 4Public Health Department, Avicenne Hospital, AP-HP, Bobigny, France
- 5Nutritional Epidemiology Surveillance Team (ESEN), Santé Publique France, The French Public Health Agency, Bobigny, France
- 6Biostatistics Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
by Lee, J. J., Ahmed, M., Julia, C., Ng, A. P., Paper, L., Lou, W. Y., and L'Abbé, M. R. (2023). Front Public Health. 11:1168745. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1168745
In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. Incorrect values were entered into the “discordant pairs” and “weighted k” columns. The corrected Table 3 and its caption “Agreement between quintile combinations of computed Canadian Front-of-pack labelling and other dietary index systems” appear below.
Table 3. Agreement between quintile combinations of computed Canadian Front-of-pack labelling and other dietary index systems.
In the published article, there was an error during the revision process. The weighted k statistic results were incorrectly represented. A correction has been made to Results, Relationship between Dietary Index Systems, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated:
“The CAN-FOPL dietary index scores showed slight agreement with the DCCP and the Nutri-score (k = 0.30–0.38) with over 65% of the total sample identified as discordant pairs (i.e., “Less healthy” in one system and “More healthy” in another system).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The CAN-FOPL dietary index scores showed fair agreement with the DCCP and the Nutri-score (k = 0.30–0.38) with over 65% of the total sample identified as discordant pairs (i.e., “Less healthy” in one system and “More healthy” in another system).”
The authors apologize for the error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: front-of-pack, FOPL, dietary patterns, nutrient profiling, HEFI, Nutri-score, DASH, DCCP
Citation: Lee JJ, Ahmed M, Julia C, Ng AP, Paper L, Lou WY and L'Abbé MR (2024) Corrigendum: Examining the diet quality of Canadian adults and the alignment of Canadian front-of-pack labelling regulations with other front-of-pack labelling systems and dietary guidelines. Front. Public Health 12:1448853. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1448853
Received: 14 June 2024; Accepted: 22 July 2024;
Published: 06 August 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Jordi Salas-Salvado, Rovira i Virgili University, Spain
Copyright © 2024 Lee, Ahmed, Julia, Ng, Paper, Lou and L'Abbé. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mary R. L'Abbé, bWFyeS5sYWJiZSYjeDAwMDQwO3V0b3JvbnRvLmNh