Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Occupational Health and Safety
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1447334

The impact of vaccine hesitancy on psychological impairment among healthcare workers in a Total Worker Health© approach

Provisionally accepted
Reparata Rosa Di Prinzio Reparata Rosa Di Prinzio 1Gabriele Arnesano Gabriele Arnesano 1*Bianca Ceresi Bianca Ceresi 2Alessia Dosi Alessia Dosi 2Mariarita Maimone Mariarita Maimone 1Maria E. Vacca Maria E. Vacca 1Maria R. Vinci Maria R. Vinci 2Vincenzo Camisa Vincenzo Camisa 2Annapaola Santoro Annapaola Santoro 2Massimiliano Raponi Massimiliano Raponi 2Paola Tomao Paola Tomao 3Nicoletta Vonesch Nicoletta Vonesch 3Umberto Moscato Umberto Moscato 1Guendalina Dalmasso Guendalina Dalmasso 2Salvatore Zaffina Salvatore Zaffina 2
  • 1 Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Roma, Italy
  • 2 Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Lazio, Italy
  • 3 National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL), Rome, Lazio, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Vaccination practice is a well-known individual protective measure for biological risk in healthcare. During the COVID-19 pandemic vaccine hesitancy has grown among healthcare workers (HCWs). The study aims to investigate how vaccine hesitancy influences the psychological burden experienced by healthcare workers.This study aimed to explore attitudes of HCWs in acceptance or refusal of vaccinations related to the risk of psychological impairment (PI) and describe the associated occupational factors, during the seasonal flu/COVID-19 vaccination campaign of 2022-2023. 302 HCWs were enrolled in the study. A questionnaire was self-administered, including two scales on the risk of psychological impairment (Psychological Injury Risk Indicator, PIRI) and vaccine hesitancy (Adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, AVHS).Results: PIRI scores revealed that 29.8% of participants were at risk of PI. Differences in sex, age, occupational seniority, professional category, and night shifts were found between HCWs at risk of PI and those not at risk. Females registered a four-fold higher risk than males (85.6% vs. 14.4%, χ2=4.450, p<.05). Nurses were the highest risk category, followed by physicians and technicians (54.4% vs. 30.0% vs. 12.2%, χ2=14.463, p<.001). 41.7% of participants received the flu vaccination, and 98.9% received the COVID-19 vaccine. HCWs were prone to being vaccinated to protect patients and family members. Conversely, vaccine refusal was attributed to the perception of flu vaccines as not beneficial and COVID-19 contagion at low risk. The latter was more frequently reported for HCWs at risk of PI (16.7% vs. 4.7%, χ2=11.882, p=.001). Finally, hesitant HCWs were at higher risk of psychological impairment than others.Discussion: HCWs expressed vaccine acceptance considering their social role in the community as protectors. However, the underestimation of the risk of severity of COVID-19 was more relevant among HCWs at risk of PI than others. Psychological aspects need to be considered by healthcare providers when fighting vaccine hesitancy.

    Keywords: COVID-19, Vaccine acceptance, Mental Health, flu, Nurse, Vaccine refusal

    Received: 11 Jun 2024; Accepted: 02 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Di Prinzio, Arnesano, Ceresi, Dosi, Maimone, Vacca, Vinci, Camisa, Santoro, Raponi, Tomao, Vonesch, Moscato, Dalmasso and Zaffina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Gabriele Arnesano, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Roma, Italy

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.