- 1Faculty of Public Health, Al Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine
- 2Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
Background: There are numerous wars and ongoing political violence in Palestine and little is known about how they have affected Palestinian undergraduate students’ mental health and coping strategies. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of depression, and anxiety symptoms and coping mechanisms among Palestinian university students during the times of current political violence in Palestine after October 7, 2023.
Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study design was utilized for a sample of students from 3 universities in Palestine (Al Quds University, Hebron University, and An-Najah University) and 1815 participants responded. Data were collected using self-reported questionnaires, including Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Brief COPE scale. Person correlation test, chi-square test, and bivariate analysis were performed to examine the associations between research variables.
Results: The estimated prevalence of depression was 65.9, and 60.9% for anxiety. The logistic regression showed that students from the Arts Faculty, females, and those with working parents were significantly more likely to experience depression and anxiety symptoms. Also, active coping, emotional support, and humor reduced the likelihood of experiencing depression symptoms, while active coping, positive reframing, humor, and acceptance decreased the likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms. Further, the study found that using religion, self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement increased the likelihood of depression symptoms while planning, venting, religion, self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement increased the likelihood of anxiety symptoms.
Conclusion: The study found that political violence often leads to symptoms of depression and anxiety among undergraduates. Furthermore, the use of maladaptive coping mechanisms increases the likelihood that these symptoms will occur. Providing immediate assistance to university students affected by political violence and conflicts is crucial for their emotional and mental recovery and coping with difficulties.
1 Background
The dangers of political violence and wars to national security have far-reaching consequences for people’s health, the economy, and overall quality of life (1). War or conflict is the deliberate use of military force or hostile activities by a government or organized non-state forces to cause harm to people and result in at least 25 fatalities (2). Most of these conflicts take place in Middle Eastern and African nations that have very low to moderate incomes, where health issues and economic status are closely related (3). More than half of the countries in the Eastern Mediterranean area are engaged in active armed conflict, affecting a total of 12 out of twenty-two countries (4–6). Major armed conflicts in recent times include conflict in Sudan, Gaza, and Ukraine (7). Research has investigated the influence of different wars, such as the Syrian conflict (8) or the conflict in Iraq (9), on particular populations. Both brief and long-term conflicts have detrimental effects on healthcare systems, displacing people from their homes and impeding their access to essential medical and mental services (4–6). By the end of 2022, over 60% or 25.8 million out of the total 43.3 million children who were forcibly relocated, experienced internal displacement due to violence and war (10). The investigation of the psychosocial well-being of people living in war-torn areas and areas affected by political violence has received considerable attention because of the high prevalence of mental health problems and increased vulnerability to signs of psychiatric disorders in the population (1). The widespread anxiety and uncertainty about the war are expected to have a long-term influence on the mental health of those affected by it (11). For instance, exposure to it can lead to mental health problems such as post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, psychiatric morbidity, heightened risk of suicide, and emotional distress. Research has shown that there is a higher prevalence of depression (28.9%) anxiety (30.7%), and post-traumatic stress disorder (23.5%) among the population after experiencing political violence (12).
Furthermore, armed and violent conflicts detrimentally affect local universities and other educational institutions (13). This includes the shutdown of educational institutions, utilization of educational facilities by the military, and unfortunate fatalities and injuries among students and staff. Teachers’ absence may result from deliberate attacks, lack of security, and restricted mobility, which raises issues regarding the enrollment of students in universities (14). Moreover, university students may encounter many mental health problems that might affect their perspective, academic achievements, and capacity to adapt to daily routines (15). For instance, war and military conflicts have a strong link to anxiety and depression disorders. This is because they cause significant trauma to both mental and physical health (16). According to the American Psychiatric Association (2013), depression is defined as persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness, accompanied by a decrease in motivation and interest in previously enjoyable activities (17). Furthermore, fear, whether triggered by physical dangers or subjective perceptions, becomes internalized and manifests as anxiety. Because of a depressive tendency, unconsciously anxious feelings can escalate into severe fear or panic (17). Research has shown that anxious and depressed students struggle with their academic pursuits and problem-solving abilities (18). Depression and anxiety are more common among university students than in the general population. Thabet et al. (19) conducted a study in which 399 university students from the Gaza Strip’s four main universities were selected randomly. According to the study, 10.3% of males and 13.8% of females reported feeling anxious. Furthermore, a study conducted in China by Yang and Yang (20) revealed that 44.64% of university students reported anxiety and 30.06% reported depression. Therefore, it is critical to consider these psychological effects on undergraduates in today’s world (21).
As a result of increased life-threatening anxiety and depression, students may feel a range of positive or negative emotions due to their inadequate coping strategies. Research suggests that problem-focused coping strategies are more beneficial for mental health, whereas emotion-focused approaches might have a negative effect (22, 23). War and political violence can have a major influence on people’s capacity to cope with stress, resulting in psychological problems such as depression, anxiety, substance abuse, aggressiveness, and addiction (24). On the other hand, prayer and family support are two coping mechanisms that might help survivors of political violence and conflict deal with their emotional distress and improve their mental health (22). Saxon et al. (25) found that the most commonly used coping mechanisms were acceptance, active coping, mental disengagement, planning, and instrumental and emotional social support. Gambling and drug use were uncommon. Academic institutions increasingly acknowledge the significance of enhancing the mental well-being of undergraduate students (26). Understanding students’ coping strategies directly or indirectly impacted by conflict is crucial for developing effective strategies to support their physical and psychological well-being (23).
In Palestine, the Israeli military has controlled the West Bank and Gaza Strip since 1967 (27). In 2023, the West Bank witnessed its worst year since 2005. Hundreds of Palestinians from the West Bank were killed. OCHA (28) and the Israeli military restricted movement between West Bank cities (29). Furthermore, the Gaza Strip has had four wars in the previous 13 years (2009, 2012, 2014, and 2021) (27). On October 7, 2023, Hamas conducted an attack that began a new conflict. Then Israel invaded and devastated Gaza. It is estimated that thousands of Palestinians have been killed or injured (28). The psychological and physical consequences of Israel’s border blockade and military occupation of Palestinians in the West Bank have been devastating (28). These consequences include a damaged economy, unemployment, altered living conditions, insufficient healthcare, and a general lack of optimism for the future. Currently, there is a lack of research that can provide stakeholders worldwide with information about the prevalence of anxiety and depression among undergraduate students, their coping strategies, and the factors that make them vulnerable during times of political violence and war in Palestine (21). To the best of the researcher’s knowledge, no previous research has looked at the frequency of anxiety and depression among West Bank undergraduates during periods of political violence and conflict. Given that young people will make up the bulk of the human workforce once they finish their university education, it is critical to emphasize their mental health, especially in the context of conflict. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms, as well as coping strategies, among Palestinian university students in the West Bank during periods of current political violence and conflict following October 7, 2023. However, as the prolonged struggle between Israel and Palestine has persisted for over 75 years, the current study may assess the long-term effects of this conflict as well as the impact of the continuing conflict that began on October 7, 2023. It additionally sought to assess the association between depression and anxiety symptoms, as well as sociodemographic and psychological characteristics, and coping strategies. Finally, it aimed to investigate the factors that predict the development of depression and anxiety symptoms.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study design and sampling
This study aimed to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms and coping strategies among Palestinian university students in the West Bank during the current political violence and war.
A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among undergraduate students at Al Quds University, Hebron University, and An-Najah University in West Bank. Al Quds University provides more than 120 undergraduate and postgraduate degrees. Its 15 faculties offer programs in medicine, life and natural sciences, business and management, arts and humanities, law and jurisprudence, engineering, and social sciences. Hebron University has 10 colleges: Islamic studies, Arts, Science, Technology, Agriculture, Medicine, Education, Finance, Management, Nursing, Pharmacy, and Graduate Studies. An-Najah University has 11 faculties spread across campuses, with 128 Bachelor’s degree programs, 78 Master’s and 13 PhD programs.
The study took place from December 7 to December 21, 2023, two months after the start of the Gaza War on October 7, 2023. These three universities are the largest Palestinian universities in the north, middle and south areas of Palestine. With a 0.05 significance level, 95% confidence level, and 0.05 accuracy, the study calculated a sample size of 1800 students. The participants were selected by using convenience sampling which is a non-probability technique used to select participants from the target population based on their easy accessibility (30). For data collection, an anonymous online self-administered survey method was used. As a result of the Israeli military’s blockade of Palestinian cities and restrictions on Palestinian travel in the West Bank, the researchers sent an electronic version of the questionnaire via Google Forms to the students at these three universities, along with an introductory invitation. The researchers sent the questionnaire online through student groups on Facebook, social media platforms, emails, and WhatsApp. A total of 1815 undergraduate students provided their responses.
2.2 Tool and measures
In this study, participants were asked to answer a self-reported questionnaire and it consisted of 3 sections.
Section one included a socio-demographic sheet to collect information related to the participant’s age, gender, faculty, income, place of residence, governorate of living (North governorate included Nablus, Jenin, Qalqilia, Tulkarim, Tubas and Salfeet cities, middle governorate included Ramallah, East Jerusalem and Jericho cities, and south governorate included Hebron and Bethlehem cities), marital status, faculty, father and mother education and work.
The second section had the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (31) which is a 14-item scale created to assess the presence of anxiety and depression. The HADS creates two scales to distinguish the two states: HADS–A for anxiety (seven questions) and HADS–D for depression (seven questions). On a 4-point severity scale, items are rated and each question is scored between 0 (no impairment) and 3 (severe impairment) with three denoting the highest anxiety or depression level. A case is considered conclusive if the score on either scale is greater than or equal to 11. A score of 0–7 is considered normal, 8–10 indicates mild depression, 11–14 indicates moderate depression and a score of 15–21 is equal to severe depression. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s α) was 0.825.
The third section had the Brief COPE scale that was developed by Carver in 1997 (32) and consisted of 28 questions. Both cognitive and behavioral strategies of coping are included and for each category, respondents indicate whether they have used a coping response on a four-point Likert scale (1 = I have not been doing this at all; 2 = I have been doing this a little bit; 3 = I have been doing this an average amount; 4 = I have been doing this a lot) and the higher score represents greater coping strategies used by the respondents. The Brief COPE scale assesses the following coping mechanisms: self-distraction, active coping, denial, substance use, emotional support, instrumental support, behavioral disengagement, venting, positive reframing, planning, humor, acceptance, religion, and self-blame. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s α) was 0.946.
A committee of five mental health experts reviewed the scale’s contents to ensure that the tool was culturally appropriate and no changes were made. The scale was first translated into Arabic by the research team and then back-translated to English by a licensed translator. At the pilot stage, we administered the tool to 20 undergraduate students to test for language clarity, both the original English questionnaire and the back-translated version were examined to ensure that the translation was accurate.
2.3 Data analysis
The data were analyzed with SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, United States). The descriptive analysis for all study variables is reported as frequencies and percentages, means, and standard deviations. Pearson correlation test, chi-square test and T-tests were performed to investigate these associations. A multivariate regression analysis was carried out, and the results are presented as adjusted odd ratios (AOR) with a 95% confidence range. The adjusted model included all potential study confounders as well as factors associated with depression and anxiety that had a p-value of less than 0.05 in the bivariate analysis.
2.4 Ethical approval and consent to participate
All methods in this study were performed under the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Al Quds University Research Ethical Committee (Ref No: 344/REC/2023). This online survey was anonymous. Written information about the aim of the study and how the data would be used was provided at the beginning of the study. Upon filling out the questionnaire, students provided informed consent for participation in this study.
3 Results
3.1 Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants
An online survey was completed by 1815 participants, who were on average 20.6 years old (SD 2.66, range 35 years), 40% were from Al Quds University and 29% were from Hebron University and An-Najah University. The bulk of participants (73.3%) came from faculties of health, and nearly one-third were third-year students. Additionally, 75.9% of the students were females, and nearly 70% of participants reported a family income of 1,600$ or less. Finally, 41.4 and 70.2% of the participants, respectively, stated that their mothers and fathers were unemployed during the war as seen in Table 1.
3.2 The prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms
The findings revealed that the overall mean for depression was 12.14 (SD 4.35) and for anxiety was 11.66 (SD 4.72). Also, the findings showed that (65.9%) of the sample met the clinical cut-off for depression (a score equal to or greater than 11), which means they are at high risk of meeting a clinical diagnosis of depression. Additionally, 60.9% of the sample met the clinical cut-off for anxiety, as shown in Table 2.
3.3 The association between depression, anxiety, and sociodemographic variables
Chi-square test assessed the associations between depression symptoms and respondent characteristics. The results, as seen in Table 3, demonstrated significant relationships between depression and the university in which the student enrolled with Al Quds University having the highest percentage (38.5%, p-value = <0.001). Significant correlations were also found between depression and the following variables:, gender (female, 79.3%, p-value = <0.001) place of living (villages, 51.6%, p-value = 015), marital status (single, 91.8%, p-value =0.049), family income (group from 500 to 1,000$: 35.6%, p-value = 0.01), district (South district, 48.1%, p-value = <0.001), father education (≤12 years group, 55.2%, p-value =0.010) father work (has work currently, 54.6%, p-value = < 001), mother’s education (≤12 years group, 52.9%, p-value =0.024) and mother work (did not have work, 72.5%, p-value = 0.003).
![www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1436672/fpubh-12-1436672-HTML-r2/image_m/fpubh-12-1436672-t003.jpg)
Table 3. The bivariate correlations between depression and sociodemographic variables in the sample.
Additionally, chi-square test was used to assess the associations between anxiety symptoms and respondent characteristics. The results, as seen in Table 4, demonstrated a significant relationship between anxiety and the university in which the student enrolled, in with Al Quds University had the highest percentages (36.3%, p-value = <0001). Significant correlations were also found between anxiety and the following variables: gender (Female, 82.2%, p-value <0.001*), place of living (Villages, 54.4%, p-value = 0.006), family income (group from 500 to 1,000$, 36.8%, p-value = <0.001), district (south district, 47.9%, p-value = <0.001), father education (≤12 years, 54.9% p-value = 0.040), father work (has work currently, 53.9%, p-value = <0.001), mother’s education (≤12 years group, 53.3%, p-value =0.015) and mother work (did not have work, 73.3%, p-value = < 0.001).
3.4 Associations between coping strategies, depression, and anxiety
Pearson correlation was used to investigate the associations between coping strategies and depression and anxiety symptoms as seen in Table 5. There were significant negative weak correlations between depression and active coping, emotional support, humor, acceptance, self-distraction, and substance use. Also, there were significantly positive weak correlations between depression and planning, venting, religion, self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement. For anxiety, there were significantly positive weak correlations between anxiety and active coping, use of informational support, positive reframing, planning, emotional support, venting, religion, self-blame, self-distraction, denial, and behavioral disengagement.
3.5 Multivariate logistic regression for determinants of depression and anxiety
The multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the factors that predict the development of depression symptoms, as seen in Table 6. The findings showed that students from faculties of arts had significantly a higher probability of having depression compared to faculties of science and faculties of health (AOR: 1.399, p-value = 0.031). Also, living in the middle governorates had significantly a lower probability of having depression compared to the north governorates (AOR: 0.717, p-value = 0.020), and being a male student had significantly a lower odd of having depression compared to a female student (AOR: 0.713, p-value = 0.010). In addition, students whose fathers had a work during the political violence and wartime had a significantly lower probability of having depression compared to those who did not have work (AOR: 1.570, p-value = <0.001). Similarly, students whose mothers had worked during the political violence and wartime had significantly a lower probability of having depression compared to those who did not have work (AOR: 0.679, p-value = 0.001). Finally, using coping strategies including active coping (AOR, 0.823, p-value = 0.000), emotional support (AOR, 0.928, p-value =0.043), humor (AOR, 0.816, p-value = <0.001) reduced the probability of developing depression symptoms. However, using religion (AOR, 1.258, p-value = <0.001), self-blame (AOR, 1.283, p-value = <0.001), denial (AOR, 1.269, p-value = <0.001), and behavioral disengagement (AOR, 1.321, p-value = <0.001), increased the likelihood of having depression symptoms.
![www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1436672/fpubh-12-1436672-HTML-r2/image_m/fpubh-12-1436672-t006.jpg)
Table 6. Multivariate logistic regression to predict the determinants of the development of depressive symptoms.
Moreover, multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the factors that predict the development of anxiety symptoms, as seen in Table 7. The findings showed that students from Al Quds University had significantly a lower probability of having anxiety symptoms compared to An-Najah University (AOR: 0.691, p-value = 0.006), and being a male student had significantly lower odds of having anxiety compared to female students (AOR: 0.521, p-value = <0.001). In addition, students whose fathers had worked during the political violence wartime had significantly a lower probability of having anxiety symptoms compared to those who did not have work (AOR: 0.784, p-value = 0.048). Additionally, using coping strategies including active coping (AOR: 0.90 7, p-value = 0.018), positive reframing (AOR: 0.928, p-value =0.036), humor (AOR: 0.855, p-value = 0.005), acceptance (AOR, 0.842, p-value = <0.001) decreased the probability of developing anxiety symptoms.
![www.frontiersin.org](https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/1436672/fpubh-12-1436672-HTML-r2/image_m/fpubh-12-1436672-t007.jpg)
Table 7. Multivariate logistic regression to predict the determinants of the development of anxiety symptoms.
On other hand, using planning (AOR: 1.156, p-value = 0.002), venting (AOR, 1.149, p-value = 0.003), religion (AOR: 1.146, p-value = 0.001), self-blame (AOR, 1.492, p-value <0.001), denial (AOR: 1.088, p-value =0.018), and behavioral disengagement (AOR: 1.247, p-value <0.001), increased the likelihood of having anxiety.
4 Discussion
This study examined the prevalence of depression and anxiety among Palestinian university students during Israeli and Palestinian political violence and war after Octiber7, 2023. The results revealed a high prevalence of depression and anxiety. In addition, active coping, emotional support, and humor reduced depression symptoms, whereas active coping, positive reframing, humor, and acceptance reduced anxiety symptoms. Furthermore, religion, self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement increased the probability of having depressive symptoms, whereas planning, venting, religion, self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement increased the likelihood of experiencing anxiety.
The current study found that 65.9% of the participants had depression symptoms, whereas 60.9% had symptoms of anxiety. This finding is considered to be high in comparison to previous research. Lim et al.’s systematic review revealed that the prevalence of depression and anxiety significantly increased after conflict or war, with 28.9 and 30.7% of participants reporting depression and anxiety, respectively. Additionally, during the conflicts, 43.4% of people had anxiety, and 38.7% experienced depression (12). Furthermore, Hoppen et al.’s (33) systematic review conducted from 1989 to 2019 in countries affected by conflicts found that 23.31% of those who survived the war had high levels of depression (34). Chudzicka-Czupała et al. (11) found that 46.3% of Ukrainians had high anxiety during the conflict, while 46.5% reported experiencing high levels of depression. Furthermore, a study done by Al Saadi et al. (35) in Syria found that the prevalence of depression was 60.6% and anxiety was 35.1%. In contrast, other research showed a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety in comparison to the current study. For instance, a study done in Pakistan revealed that 75% of university students exhibited symptoms of depression, whereas 88.4% reported experiencing anxiety (19). Research done in Ukraine found that 97.8% of university students experienced a decline in their psycho-emotional well-being, with a significant proportion (84.3%) having symptoms associated with depression (36).
Palestinian undergraduate students are more likely to experience depression and anxiety symptoms, which could be attributed to the country’s history of political violence (35). The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine has a significant impact on the younger generation (35). Additionally, Palestinian university students face unemployment, poverty, insecurity, and siege (36). Furthermore, significant educational disruption during political violence and war times may raise undergraduate students’ risk of depression and anxiety [38.] All West Bank Palestinian universities have been closed since October 7 because of political violence. Zoom-based virtual education has replaced in-person teaching. In the first month after the political violence and new war, thousands of Palestinian students boycotted classes due to psychological distress caused by the deaths and injuries in Gaza. Lockdowns in West Bank cities, as well as remote learning, may have made students more vulnerable to social isolation and loneliness, exacerbating their depression and anxiety symptoms during the conflict. Ge et al. found a link between lonely living, isolation, inadequate relationships, and depression (37). Our study suggests that mental health service delivery and interventions should adapt to prevent difficulties with mobility and university or city closures during war or political violence. A computerized program can increase awareness of mental health issues among Palestinian undergraduates. Students can access the program via their university accounts at any time.
Moreover, our findings showed that arts or humanities students were more likely to experience depression than health and science students. Similarly, Banu et al. and Baviskar et al. reported that humanities or art students were more depressed than science students (38, 39). In contrast, Wani found that science students experienced higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (73.86, 96.14, and 88.46%) than art students (40). Health and science students may have a better knowledge of mental health issues like depression and anxiety, resulting in better emotional management. Our findings also revealed that middle governorate students were significantly less depressed than northern governorate students and Al Quds University students reported significantly lower levels of anxiety than students at An-Najah University in Nablus, Northern Palestine. This result could be due to an Israeli military operation in Jenin and Nablus in the northern governorate before the beginning of the political violence on October 7th. This political violence may have exacerbated the undergraduates’ depression and anxiety symptoms. Therefore, Palestinian universities should provide psychological interventions that target students from the northern governorate of Palestine.
Furthermore, male students in the current study were significantly less likely than female students to show signs of depression or anxiety. These findings are consistent with previous research, which found that female students are more stressed, anxious, and depressed than males (41, 42). Other research reported that men (67.35%) experienced more depressive symptoms than women (42). Some studies revealed no significant relationship between depression and gender, but a strong link between female gender and anxiety (43, 44). Additionally, our study found that students whose fathers worked during political violence had a lower risk of developing depression and anxiety symptoms compared to those who did not work. Similarly, students whose mothers worked during the war were significantly less likely to experience depressive symptoms than those who did not. Our findings are consistent with previous research, which found that low-income students are more likely to experience depression and stress (45–48). In contrast, Al Saadi et al. (41) found that while monthly family income had no significant effect on students’ psychological distress, attitude toward personal income was a significant predictor of depression and anxiety. Other research revealed no link between economic status and depression (49). The Palestinian economy has been experiencing a crisis since October 2023, including loss of life, financial damage, and unemployment. This has resulted in additional cuts and delays in public salary disbursements (50). Additionally, Palestinian workers were barred from entering Israel to work. Most Palestinian undergraduate students rely on family income as they have no other sources of income. Poverty has been consistently associated with poor mental health (51, 52). As a result, these factors may contribute significantly to the rise in mental health issues such as depression and anxiety symptoms among Palestinian undergraduate students.
These affective disorders could be caused by differences in how people deal with emotional distress. Our study found that active coping, emotional support, and humor reduced depression symptoms, while active coping, positive reframing, humor, and acceptance reduced anxiety symptoms. Problem-focused coping strategies including active coping and positive reframing are an active attempt to handle a stressful circumstance by participating in problem-solving activities to change the situation or seek alternatives. Positive emotional coping strategies, such as humor, and emotional support, involve showing compassion and empathy towards oneself while trying to solve a problem independently, regardless of the outcome. These strategies also involve making cognitive adjustments that help generate positive emotions and promote a sense of calmness in difficult situations (53). According to Stanisławski (53), acceptance is a positive emotion-focused coping strategy that is also linked to considerably reduced anxiety and stress scores. It involves the ability to accept the reality of a stressful situation (53). Our study supports the literature review’s findings that emotional support and active coping are effective at protecting undergraduate students in conflict zones from depression and anxiety (23, 54). Saxon et al. (25) found that humor, emotional support, active coping, and acceptance all contributed to better mental health in conflict zones. Garg et al. (55) indicated that emotional focused coping strategies such as humor, and emotional support reduce depressive symptoms. However, Mozid (56) revealed that emotion-focused coping strategies such as seeking emotional support, venting, humor, acceptance, self-blame, and religion had a significant negative correlation with psychological distress. Our study found a negative correlation between humor and depression and anxiety, supporting previous research (57). Stockton et al. (58) revealed that humor reduces depression, interpersonal suicide risk, suicidal ideation, and anxiety. Additionally, anxiety and acceptance were negatively correlated in our study, supporting the literature review (59, 60). Crișan et al. (59) found that adaptability-based acceptance is the most effective factor in reducing anxiety in political violence and war. Thus, students might get benefits from using these coping strategies to efficiently manage and modify the factors that contribute to their stress in the context of political violence and conflict. Furthermore, students can manage and control their emotional responses to these difficult situations, perhaps leading to a reduction in symptoms associated with depression and anxiety.
Additionally, the current study found that religion, self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement increased the likelihood of experiencing depression symptoms while planning, venting, religion, self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement increased the likelihood of experiencing anxiety. Similarly, Awoke et al. reported that using denial, self-blame, planning, and religion to cope with stress was associated with high perceived stress among undergraduate students (61). Crișan et al. (59) showed that venting emotions and behavioral disengagement had the greatest negative impact on anxiety and well-being. Furthermore, Thapa et al. (62) study found that coping strategies like denial, positive reframing, and religion had a negative relationship with stress in university students. Furthermore, Garg et al. (55) reported that avoidant coping mechanisms (self-distraction, denial, and behavioral disengagement), and emotional focused coping strategy (venting) were significantly associated with increased depressive symptoms in undergraduate students. Additionally, the Saxon study found that coping strategies such as behavioral and mental disengagement, denial, emotional venting, substance abuse, and gambling were significantly associated with poorer mental health outcomes (25). According to Deng et al. (46) undergraduate students are unable to self-manage their emotions and have not developed coping strategies for stressful experiences, making them vulnerable to depression and anxiety. These findings suggest the significance of creating an intervention program focused on teaching effective coping strategies to undergraduate students during periods of political violence and war.
This research had some limitations. Using convenience sampling limits the generalizability of our findings to a wider population of Palestinian university students. Also, the study’s cross-sectional design limits causal inferences about the relationship between exposure to political violence and mental health outcomes. Additionally, using self-reported questionnaire increases the possibility of reporting bias. Further, this study only included three Palestinian universities, which may not reflect the diversity of the student population in Palestine. In addition, students at other universities may experience different levels of anxiety and depression than those who participated in this study. Despite these limitations, the results shed new light on the mental health of undergraduates in areas with ongoing conflicts, and those known to suffer from a disproportionately high rate of mental diseases like depression and anxiety. This study adds significantly to the existing literature by being the first of its kind to examine the symptoms of anxiety and depression as well as coping mechanisms among Palestinian undergraduates who were enrolled during periods of political violence and conflict.
4.1 Implication of the study and future research
The study suggests screening and intervention programs to prevent and treat mental health problems among undergraduate students studying in conflict zones. Our findings highlight the need to use an innovative approach to delivering mental health treatments and interventions to address difficulties such as restricted mobility and dealing with the closure of universities or cities during times of war or political instability. Implementing a computerized program might be an effective strategy to enhance knowledge about the symptoms of mental or psychological problems that Palestinian undergraduate students may experience. Students can access this program at their leisure by logging into their university accounts. Furthermore, mental health practitioners and university officials should offer clinical and educational interventions to help students develop effective coping strategies and enhance their emotional well-being in the face of political violence.
More studies are needed to determine the psychological impact of political violence on the well-being of students in communities and families during and after the war. Future research is needed to investigate additional risk factors for depression and anxiety, such as fear of war, stress, and feelings of loneliness.
5 Conclusion
The study found that political violence often leads to symptoms of depression and anxiety among undergraduates. Furthermore, the use of maladaptive coping mechanisms increases the likelihood that these symptoms will occur. Providing immediate assistance to university students affected by political violence and conflicts is crucial for their emotional and mental recovery and coping with difficulties.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Al Quds University Research Ethical Committee (Ref No: 344/REC/2023). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
MA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NE: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. IA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. EA: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. MD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all students for their participation in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Anjum, G, Aziz, M, and Hamid, HK. Life and mental health in limbo of the Ukraine war: how can helpers assist civilians, asylum seekers and refugees affected by the war? Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1129299. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129299
2. Le, TH, Bui, MT, and Uddin, GS. Economic and social impacts of conflict: a cross-country analysis. Econ Model. (2022) 115:105980. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105980
3. Goniewicz, K, Burkle, FM, Horne, S, Borowska-Stefańska, M, Wiśniewski, S, and Khorram-Manesh, A. The influence of war and conflict on infectious disease: a rapid review of historical lessons we have yet to learn. Sustain For. (2021) 13:10783. doi: 10.3390/su131910783
4. OECD. COVID-19 crisis response in MENA countries. OECD, Tackling Coronavirus Contrib to a Global Effort. (2020). 1–39. Available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=129_129919-4li7bq8asv&title=COVID-19-Crisis-Response-in-MENA-Countries (Accessed June 25, 2024).
5. Al-Mandhari, AS, Brennan, RJ, Abubakar, A, and Hajjeh, R. Tackling COVID-19 in the eastern Mediterranean region. Lancet. (2020) 396:1786–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32349-7
6. Brennan, R, Hajjeh, R, and Al-Mandhari, A. Responding to health emergencies in the eastern Mediterranean region in times of conflict. Lancet. (2022) 399:e20–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30069-6
7. Brake, TM, and Razum, O. Prevention of war: a scoping review on primary preventive measures in public health. Public Health Rev. (2024) 44:1606201. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2023.1606201 38239564
8. Kešeljević, A, and Spruk, R. Estimating the effects of Syrian civil war. Empir Econ. (2024) 66:671–703. doi: 10.1007/s00181-023-02470-2
9. Younis, M, and Aswad, A. The impact of war and economic sanctions on the mental health system in Iraq from 1990 to 2003: a preliminary report. Intervention. (2017) 16:54. doi: 10.1097/WTF.0000000000000144
10. UNICEF. (2023). For every child. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/number-displaced-children-reaches-new-high-433-million (Accessed June 2, 2024).
11. Chudzicka-Czupała, A, Hapon, N, Chiang, SK, Żywiołek-Szeja, M, Karamushka, L, Lee, CT, et al. Depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress during the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war, a comparison between populations in Poland, Ukraine, and Taiwan. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:3602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28729-3
12. Lim, ICZY, Tam, WWS, Chudzicka-Czupała, A, McIntyre, RS, Teopiz, KM, Ho, RC, et al. Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress in war- and conflict-afflicted areas: a meta-analysis. Front Psych. (2022) 13:978703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.978703
13. Assefa, Y, Tilwani, SA, Moges, BT, and Shah, MA. The impact of armed violence on students' educational attainment and the role of parents in resilience schooling and the education process. Heliyon. (2022) 8:e12192. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12192
14. Jones, A., and Naylor, R. (2014). The quantitative impact of armed conflict on education: counting the human and financial costs. Available at: http://educationandconflict.org/sites/default/files/publication/CfBT023_ArmedConflict_Online.pdf (Accessed June 25, 2024).
15. Alotaibi, NM. Future anxiety among young people affected by war and armed conflict: indicators for social work practice. Front Sociol. (2021) 6:729811. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.729811
16. Helpman, L, Besser, A, and Neria, Y. Acute posttraumatic stress symptoms but not generalized anxiety symptoms are associated with severity of exposure to war trauma: a study of civilians under fire. J Anxiety Disord. (2015) 35:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.08.001
17. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (2013).
18. Asif, S, Mudassar, A, Shahzad, TZ, Raouf, M, and Pervaiz, T. Frequency of depression, anxiety and stress among university students. Pak J Med Sci. (2020) 36:971–6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.5.1873
19. Thabet, AAM, and Sultan, SMA. War trauma, anxiety, and resilience among university students in the Gaza strip. Clin Psychiatry. (2016) 03:3. doi: 10.21767/2471-9854.100032
20. Yang, N, and Yang, X. Anxiety and depression in graduating university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study. Am J Transl Res. (2022) 14:2668–76.35559421
21. Ramón-Arbués, E, Gea-Caballero, V, Granada-López, JM, Juárez-Vela, R, Pellicer-García, B, and Antón-Solanas, I. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress and their associated factors in college students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:7001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197001
23. Raccanello, D, Burro, R, Aristovnik, A, Ravšelj, D, Umek, L, Vicentini, G, et al. Coping and emotions of global higher education students to the Ukraine war worldwide. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:8561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59009-3
24. Inoue, C, Shawler, E, Jordan, CH, Moore, MJ, and Jackson, CA. Veteran and military mental health issues. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing (2023).
25. Saxon, L, Makhashvili, N, Chikovani, I, Seguin, M, McKee, M, Patel, V, et al. Coping strategies and mental health outcomes of conflict-affected persons in the republic of Georgia. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. (2017) 26:276–86. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000019
26. Hammoudi Halat, D, Soltani, A, Dalli, R, Alsarraj, L, and Malki, A. Understanding and fostering mental health and well-being among university faculty: a narrative review. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:4425. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134425
27. Milton, S, Elkahlout, G, and Attallah, S. Shrinking reconstruction space in the Gaza strip: rebuilding after the 2021 and 2022 wars. Conflict Secur Dev. (2024) 24:49–78. doi: 10.1080/14678802.2024.2314034
28. OCHA. (2024). Reported impact since 7 October 2023. Available at: https://www.ochaopt.org/ (Accessed May 15, 2024).
29. Farhat, T, Ibrahim, S, Abdul-Sater, Z, and Abu-Sittah, G. Responding to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza: damned if you do… damned if you don't! Ann Glob Health. (2023) 89:53. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3975
30. Stratton, SJ. Population research: convenience sampling strategies. Prehosp Disaster Med. (2021) 36:373–4. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649
31. Zigmond, AS, and Snaith, RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (1983) 67:361–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x 6880820
32. Carver, CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider 543 the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. (1997) 4:92–100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6
33. Hoppen, TH, Priebe, S, Vetter, I, and Morina, N. Global burden of post-traumatic stress disorder and major depression in countries affected by war between 1989 and 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. (2021) 6:e006303. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006303
34. Kurapov, A, Pavlenko, V, Drozdov, A, Bezliudna, V, Reznik, A, and Isralowitz, R. Toward an understanding of the Russian-Ukrainian war impact on university students and personnel. J Loss Trauma. (2023) 28:167–74. doi: 10.1080/15325024.2022.2084838
35. Miller-Graff, LE, and Cummings, EM. The Israeli–Palestinian conflict: Effects on youth adjustment, available interventions, and future research directions. Dev Rev. (2017) 43:1–47. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.10.001
36. Hammad, J, and Tribe, R. Social suffering and the psychological impact of structural violence and economic oppression in an ongoing conflict setting: the Gaza strip. J Community Psychol. (2020) 48:1791–810. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22367
37. Ge, L, Yap, CW, Ong, R, and Heng, BH. Social isolation, loneliness and their relationships with depressive symptoms: a population-based study. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0182145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182145
38. Banu, P, Deb, S, Vardhan, V, and Rao, T. Perceived academic stress of university students across gender, academic streams, semesters, and academic performance. Ind J Health Wellbeing. (2015) 6:412–6.
39. Baviskar, M, Phalke, V, and Phalke, D. Depression, anxiety and stress: a comparative study in arts, science and commerce students from a rural area of India. Glob Res Anal. (2013) 2:183–185.
40. Wani, M. Stress anxiety and depression among science and arts students. Int J Educ Psychol Res. (2016) 5:48–52.
41. Al Saadi, T, Zaher Addeen, S, Turk, T, et al. Psychological distress among medical students in conflicts: a cross-sectional study from Syria. BMC Med Educ. (2017) 17:43–50. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1012-2
42. Islam, MA, Barna, SD, Raihan, H, Khan, MNA, and Hossain, MT. Depression and anxiety among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: a web-based cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0238162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238162 32845928
43. Sahu, PK, Nayak, BS, Rodrigues, V, and Umakanthan, S. Prevalence of psychological distress among undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. (2020) 10:270–5. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_100_19 33376702
44. Hakami, RM. Prevalence of psychological distress among undergraduate students at Jazan University: a cross-sectional study. Saudi J Med Med Sci. (2018) 6:82–8. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_73_17
45. Mehareen, J, Rahman, MA, Dhira, TA, and Sarker, AR. Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of depression, anxiety, and co-morbidity during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study among public and private university students of Bangladesh. J Affect Disord Rep. (2021) 5:100179. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100179
46. Deng, J, Zhou, F, Hou, W, Silver, Z, Wong, CY, Chang, O, et al. The prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbance in higher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. (2021) 301:113863. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113863
47. Rahman, MM, Asikunnaby Khan, SJ, Arony, A, Mamun, ZA, Procheta, NF, and Islam, ARMT. Mental health condition among university students of Bangladesh during the critical COVID-19 period. J Clin Med. (2022) 11:4617. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154617
48. Shafiq, S, Nipa, SN, Sultana, S, Rahman, MRU, and Rahman, MM. Exploring the triggering factors for mental stress of university students amid COVID-19 in Bangladesh: a perception-based study. Child Youth Serv Rev. (2021) 120:105789. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105789
49. Kabir, R, Sultana, MZ, Mondal, MSH, and Kabir, I. Undergraduate Student’s stress, anxiety, depression and their coping styles during Covid-19. Mental Health: Global Challenges Journal. (2023) 6:67–76. doi: 10.56508/mhgcj.v6i1.156
50. World Bank. Macro poverty outlook for Palestinian territories: April 2024 - datasheet (English). Macro poverty outlook (MPO). Washington, DC: World Bank.
51. Santiago, CD, Kaltman, S, and Miranda, J. Poverty and mental health: how do low-income adults and children fare in psychotherapy? J Clin Psychol.. (2013) 69:115–26.
52. Knifton, L, and Inglis, G. Poverty and mental health: policy, practice and research implications. BJPsych Bull. (2020) 44:52–62. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2020.78
53. Stanisławski, K. The coping Circumplex model: an integrative model of the structure of coping with stress. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:694. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00694
54. Seguin, M, and Roberts, B. Coping strategies among conflict-affected adults in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review. Glob Public Health. (2017) 12:811–29. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1107117
55. Garg, S, Chauhan, A, Singh, S, and Bansal, K. Determinants of depression and its associated coping mechanisms among college students confined during COVID-19 lockdown: a cross-sectional E-survey in India. Arch Med Health Sci. (2021) 9:19–27. doi: 10.4103/amhs.amhs_336_20
56. Mozid, NE. Association between psychological distress and coping strategies among students engaged in online learning. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0270877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270877
57. Rothermich, K, Ogunlana, A, and Jaworska, N. Change in humor and sarcasm use based on anxiety and depression symptom severity during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Psychiatr Res. (2021) 140:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.027
58. Stockton, J, Tucker, R, Kleiman, E, and Wingate, L. How does gratitude affect the relationship between positive humor styles and suicide-related outcomes? Personal Individ Differ. (2016) 102:240–4. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.016
59. Crișan, CA, Milhem, Z, Stretea, R, Hossu, RM, Florean, IS, and Cherecheș, RM. Coping mechanisms during the war in Ukraine: a cross-sectional assessment among Romanian population. Healthcare. (2023) 11:1412. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101412
60. Ford, BQ, Lam, P, John, OP, and Mauss, IB. The psychological health benefits of accepting negative emotions and thoughts: laboratory, diary, and longitudinal evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2018) 115:1075–92. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000157
61. Awoke, M, Mamo, G, Abdu, S, and Terefe, B. Perceived stress and coping strategies among undergraduate health science students of Jimma University amid the COVID-19 outbreak: online cross-sectional survey. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:639955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639955
Keywords: undergraduates, political violence, coping strategies, depression, anxiety
Citation: Ahmead M, El Sharif N, Abuiram I, Alshawish E and Dweib M (2024) Depression, anxiety and coping strategies among Palestinian university students during political violence: a cross sectional study. Front. Public Health. 12:1436672. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1436672
Edited by:
Jacob Owusu Sarfo, University of Cape Coast, GhanaReviewed by:
Bojana Pejuskovic, University of Belgrade, SerbiaMyriam El Khoury-Malhame, Lebanese American University, Lebanon
Mark Dust, California State University, Fullerton, United States
Copyright © 2024 Ahmead, El Sharif, Abuiram, Alshawish and Dweib. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Muna Ahmead, mohammadd@hebron.edu