Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1436386

A Narrative Review of the CEPH-Accredited Bachelor's Public Health Programs' Curricula in the United States

Provisionally accepted
Satish Kedia Satish Kedia 1Coree Entwistle Coree Entwistle 1Laura Magaña Laura Magaña 2Tracie G. Seward Tracie G. Seward 2Ashish Joshi Ashish Joshi 1*
  • 1 School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, United States
  • 2 Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH), Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Undergraduate programs in public health are becoming increasingly popular in United States. The recent pandemic, growing climate instability, and the aging of the baby boomers have led to higher demands for skilled public health professionals at various levels of the workforce. This study examines the nature of courses being delivered in undergraduate public health programs across the United States. The goal is to assess domains, themes, competencies, and other specialized skills that are currently covered in these academic programs. Methodology: A search was conducted in February 2023 using the online CEPH program database to identify undergraduate public health programs in the US. In total, 86 institutions and 90 CEPH-accredited undergraduate public health programs were identified. Lists of public health courses were retrieved from each program, and a total of 2,259 unduplicated courses were extracted and analyzed. A content analysis of the extracted topics was conducted to generate 38 common themes among the courses offered. Coded course themes were mapped to the public health domains and competencies listed by the ASPPH and CEPH to evaluate the distribution of themes across course offerings. Results: Analysis of course themes found that Foundations of Public Health, Epidemiology, Public Health Management, Policy, and Leadership, Climate and Environmental Health, and Global Health Issues were the most prevalent. When course themes were mapped onto the ASPPH and CEPH domains of critical public health learning, “overview of public health” and “determinants of health” were the most populated domains. Programs had different emphases according to their approach, but overall, about two-thirds of course themes were focused on foundational and theoretical concepts of public health, and one-third were directed toward practical applications of public health concepts. Conclusion: As the demand for skilled public health workers continues to rise, programs will need to watch the skills and competencies required in the current working environment, as well as the ASPPH and CEPH criteria, and adjust their approach accordingly. Given the rapid changes in the public health landscape, schools and programs of public health should evaluate their curricula to ensure that they are meeting the needs of the workforce and the world.

    Keywords: Undergraduate public health programs, public health education, public health curriculum, BSPH, BAPH, Ceph, ASPPH, United States

    Received: 22 May 2024; Accepted: 01 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kedia, Entwistle, Magaña, Seward and Joshi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ashish Joshi, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.