Sanket Nagar
Liwei Ma
Yijun Pan
Andrew Liem Hieu Huynh
Edwin C. K. Tan
Liang Jin- 1The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- 2Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- 3Applied Research Centre for Disability and Wellbeing, Launceston, TAS, Australia
- 4Possability Group, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- 5Department of Aged Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- 6Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- 7School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
Introduction: Pharmacological management is a vital aspect of dementia care. Suboptimal medication prescribing and adverse drug reactions are major causes for ongoing concerns for the quality of care. This review aims to investigate the existence and comprehensiveness of Australian guidelines dedicated to supporting dementia care in the context of pharmacological management.
Methods: Guideline registries and databases (EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched to identify Australian guidelines addressing pharmacological management in dementia care and to uncover barriers and considerations associated with guideline implementation.
Results: Seven Australian guidelines were identified. Barriers to effective implementation were identified at individual, provider, and system levels. None of the identified guidelines provided comprehensive guidance on management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy.
Discussion: Although Australian guidelines are available to guide pharmacological management in dementia, several barriers impede their effective implementation. There is an urgent need for updated guidelines that address the management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in people living with dementia.
1 Introduction
Dementia is a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life (1, 2), including Alzheimer’s dementia (AD, 60–70% of cases), vascular dementia (10–15%), frontotemporal dementia (20%), and Lewy body dementia (5%) (3). In addition, Parkinson’s disease, traumatic brain injury and cardiovascular disease are also considered risk factors for the development of dementia (4). In Australia, dementia is the second leading cause of death and is a public health concern – it increases hospitalizations and placement in residential aged care (5). With an aging and growing population, it is predicted that the number of Australians with dementia will more than double by 2056 to over 1 million people (6). Among these individuals, more than 83% experience profound or severe activity limitation, necessitating support and supervision for communication, self-care, and/or mobility (6).
To overcome the challenges associated with dementia, the use of pharmacological interventions becomes an imperative aspect of care. Although disease-modifying drugs (e.g., aducanumab, lecanemab) have shown promising effects for early-stage AD (7, 8) and have been approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), they have not been approved in Australia. Current dementia care still focusses on improving and/or maintaining quality of life through the management of specific symptoms (9). Concerningly, an Australian study reported that around 42% of regularly prescribed medications for people living with dementia (PLWD) were considered potentially ‘inappropriate’ (10). For example, antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, are frequently prescribed and administered to manage behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), despite limited efficacy and significant short- and long-term adverse effects, including death (11, 12). In fact, it is found that only around 10% of psychotropic prescriptions for PLWD in Australia were considered ‘appropriate’ (13). The inappropriate use of psychotropics to manage behavior is often referred to as ‘chemical restraint’. Australia has a largely aging population, with one in three older people with dementia living in supported accommodation (5). The recent findings from the Royal Commission on the aged care sector shed light on the need for substantial reforms, including enhanced training and support for workers, and a strong emphasis on minimizing the use of chemical restraint (14, 15). The issues surrounding the aging population are further heightened in regional and remote areas (16), where resources are already limited.
Another consideration relates to comorbidity and the associated polypharmacy. PLWD have multiple chronic conditions (17), resulting in elevated rates of polypharmacy (18, 19). In Australia, PLWD have an average of five comorbidities (18), with those living in aged care settings prescribed an average of 14.6 medications (20, 21). Often, only one or two medications are specially prescribed for dementia, with most other medications addressing the multimorbidity, e.g., depression, anxiety, cardiovascular disease, incontinence, etc. (19). The high prevalence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy may account for the heightened incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and poor health outcomes in PLWD. Studies reported that approximately 25–30% of unplanned hospital admissions from aged care settings in Australia can be attributed to ADRs (22), with half of these suggested to be avoidable (23). One study found that around 76% of PLWD in Australia were prescribed at least one medication with a drug–drug interaction (24), with another Australian study reporting 38% of prescriptions had potentially severe interactions, leading to respiratory depression, cardiac arrest, and death (10). Furthermore, due to the protracted and variable progression of dementia, determining the suitability and necessity of medication for comorbidities becomes challenging (25). Medications once considered suitable may become less appropriate as a person’s dementia advances (26). The need for clear and practical guidelines is evident to ensure optimal pharmacological management of multimorbidity and the associated polypharmacy in PLWD.
Together, the issues mentioned above highlight the urgency for Australian-specific guidelines addressing pharmacological treatment in PLWD to manage their symptoms associated with dementia and multimorbidity. Through expert consultation, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has identified priority areas for dementia research and care, including development of interventions that address cognitive impairment and BPSD (27, 28). While these priorities are crucial, pharmacological interventions that address symptoms do currently exist. However, it remains unclear if there is adequate guidance on best practice and proper implementation. Guidelines play a vital role in providing clear and effective directions for treatment. By addressing issues like inappropriate psychotropic use and polypharmacy, potential harm can be minimized, ultimately reducing the strain on healthcare resources, and contributing to policy development and reform. This review aims to identify the current gaps in the guidelines for pharmacological management of PLWD in Australia and synthesize the main barriers to allow for future investigation and research, and to facilitate health practitioners and specialist organizations to take the required steps for guideline formulation.
2 Materials and methods
A systematic search was conducted for study selection and data extraction. Relevance was assessed based on titles and abstracts, and pertinent articles were stored in Zotero (version 6.0.30) with duplicates removed. Data extraction and coding was performed in Microsoft Excel (version 16.80) to capture content, focusing on specific barriers.
2.1 Search strategy
Although the data for this review is largely qualitative and there are no comparators, the PICO method has been utilized to integrate search terms. PICO has demonstrated effectiveness when adapted for qualitative research and produced greater sensitivity and comprehensiveness of searches (29). Searches were conducted in the EMBASE and CINAHL databases between 01/09/2023 and 08/09/2023 to identify studies published between 2000 and 2023, and only publications in English were considered. Bibliographies of key papers were also reviewed to identify other relevant papers. To identify current Australian dementia practice guidelines, we also searched the Medical Journal of Australia Guidelines, World Health Organization Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidance, Therapeutic Guidelines, and Guidelines International Network using search term “dementia” (Appendix 1). Targeted web searches were also conducted to reveal any organizational or governmental clinical practice guidelines. There were no restrictions regarding the type of dementia or patient demographic information. No specific quality criterion, such as the impact factor of a journal, was enforced, and the inclusion criteria were not determined by the study design. Instead, papers were evaluated for their relevance, with the nature and quality of evidence being considered as part of the review process.
3 Results
The present review identified existing Australian dementia guidelines, highlighted the gaps of these guideline for pharmacological management of multimorbidity, and summarized the main barriers to guideline implementation from three perspectives: (1) individual-related; (2) health provider-related; and (3) system and support-related (outlined in Figure 1).
Figure 1. Outline of findings from this literature review. (1) Seven Australian guidelines on dementia care were identified. In the context of pharmacological management, they focused primarily on cognitive decline and behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). (2) The gap of the identified guidelines in pharmacological management is that comprehensive guidelines on management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy are not available. (3) The barriers to the implementation of dementia guidelines in Australia can be grouped into three perspectives.
3.1 The identified guidelines
Seven Australian guidelines were identified, which were published between 2012 and 2022 (Table 1). Six were in the form of a report/handbook (30–34, 36), while one was an online resource/webpage (35). Four contain information regarding medication management of the cognitive symptoms of dementia (31, 33–35), with one exclusively elucidating deprescribing these medications (33). Six contain information on the treatment of BPSD (30–32, 34–36). Notably, none of the identified guidelines provide explicit guidance on the management of general medication treatment plans in the context of dementia care, including specific considerations related to multimorbidity and polypharmacy.
Table 1. Australian pharmacological guidelines for dementia care.
Of the guidelines identified, the ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia’ (CPG) from the Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre (31) is the gold standard for dementia care in Australia. The CPG was developed by adapting the 2006 NICE guidelines for the United Kingdom’s National Health Service through expert consensus (37) and it was approved by the NHMRC in February 2016 and endorsed by various medical bodies, such as The Australian and New Zealand Society for Geriatric Medicine, and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. Although slated for a formal review in 2021, this has not eventuated. Notably, the 2006 NICE guidelines, which served as the foundation for the CPG, were updated in 2018 (37). This discrepancy in the currency of the guidelines raises concerns about their alignment with current best practices and the latest research developments in dementia care. To address this concern, the update of CPG has recently been funded through the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) initiative – Dementia Aging and Aged Care Mission (38), which aims to support older people in maintaining their health and quality of life as they age, living independently for longer, and accessing quality care when they need it. Regardless, although the CPG are considered the Australian gold standard, there are significant gaps when it comes to the pharmacological management of PLWD, which ideally should be addressed in the updated guideline.
The most comprehensive pharmacological guidelines are published by Therapeutic Guidelines Limited (35). Therapeutic Guidelines is endorsed by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the National Prescribing Service, the Royal College of Nursing Australia, and the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia. Therapeutic Guidelines provide detailed information and guidance on the pharmacological management of a wide range of medical conditions, offering a collection of 21 specialty subject drug guides, including over 2,500 clinical topics and 3,500 drug recommendations. The official website emphasizes regular updates, with expert interpretation of evidence and input from a network of medical professionals. Despite this, there is a recurrent reference to seek specialist and expert advice, with a clear condition of use and disclaimer indicating that the information within the guidelines may not be accurate, up-to-date, or exhaustive, and that the guidelines do not constitute professional advice (39). This ambiguity regarding the evidence base makes the practicability and application of these guidelines unclear. In addition, access to these guidelines requires a paid subscription, potentially limiting the extent to which clinicians utilize this resource.
3.2 Guideline on pharmacological intervention for cognitive decline
The CPG and Therapeutic Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine), along with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (memantine) in AD. There is limited clinical recommendation for other forms of dementia, such as Lewy body and vascular dementia.
Regarding clinical guidance for prescribing and monitoring, the CPG offers only general principles. For example, the guidelines note that ongoing treatment is dependent on a “clinically meaningful response…consider[ing] the person’s quality of life, cognitive functioning and behavioural symptoms” (31). However, there is a noticeable absence of specific directives or insights into how medical professionals and carers should interpret clinical aspects like measuring quality of life and cognitive function. Furthermore, there is a lack of clarity regarding the specific indicators to be employed, such as formal neuropsychological testing or assessment of domains of functioning. However, this information is available in the only other NHMRC-approved guideline (33). These guidelines specifically provide clinical information for how to titrate and stop the use of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, with clear guidance on titrating regimens, what assessment tools to use to capture clinical change, and what ADRs to monitor during the process. This deprescribing guideline can therefore be used in conjunction with the CPG to ensure best practice, albeit only for discontinuation and deprescribing of medications indicated for cognitive symptoms of dementia.
3.3 Guideline on pharmacological intervention for BPSD
Six of the seven identified guidelines specifically address management of BPSD (30–32, 34–36). In Australia, risperidone is the only oral medication that is approved for BPSD associated with AD. Other antipsychotics such as quetiapine and olanzapine are often prescribed off-label (32). The NSW Ministry of Health guidelines provide a hierarchy for medication use, starting with analgesics, then antidepressants, antipsychotics, cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, benzodiazepines, and anticonvulsants as a last resort (36). The guidelines provide a general overview on each class of medication, including ADRs and recommendations for treatment (36). Similar recommendations are noted in the other guidelines, albeit without a hierarchy of use (31, 32, 34, 35). The CPG offer some suggestions on pharmacological management, noting that medications such as risperidone and olanzapine, which serve as antipsychotics, may be used to address agitation and aggression. Citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is recommended for people with dementia who experience agitation, and prior non-pharmacological treatments fail or are inappropriate. The guidelines also mention the necessity of parenteral treatment and highlight that intramuscular administration is preferable to intravenous administration because it is safer (31). It also highlights specific conditions that need to be met before and during treatment, such as consultation with the individual and their family, operationalizing the target behavior, considering comorbidities, and conducting regular reviews every 4–12 weeks (31). Similarly, the guidelines published by Burns and colleagues (30) provide comprehensive detail pertaining to assessment, clinical decision making (including cultural and contextual considerations) and specify treatment for various aspects of BPSD (e.g., Chapters for ‘aggression’, ‘anxiety’, and ‘wandering’). Despite this increased level of clinical guidance in both the CPG and guidelines by Burns and colleagues, there is no specific information on dosages and titration protocols. While this information is available in other guidelines (35), the need to refer to multiple sources may limit applicability and use by medical professionals.
3.4 Barriers to guideline implementation
There is a dearth of research specifically addressing appropriate guideline implementation for pharmacological management of PLWD in Australia. Regarding barriers, three overarching themes emerged: barriers that are individual-, healthcare provider- and system/supports-related.
3.4.1 Individual-related
3.4.1.1 Disease heterogeneity
Most research and subsequent guideline recommendations are centralized around AD, which poses challenges when supporting people with mixed or other types of dementia. For example, the CPG do not provide any guidance on the pharmacological management of people with frontotemporal dementia, with no mention of this form within the sections addressing cognitive or behavioral symptoms (31). This is concerning when considering that around 10% of dementia presentation reflects frontotemporal dementia and symptoms often manifest as behavioral changes, which are quite different from AD (31, 40). Even among individuals with the same type of dementia, there can be substantial variability in symptoms and disease manifestation. While guidelines offer valuable information on the severity of dementia and how to manage medication accordingly, the individualized and specialized care required often transcends what guidelines alone can provide (25).
3.4.1.2 Disease stages
One of the central issues highlighted in the literature is the intrinsic complexity of assessing and monitoring the effects of medications on PLWD, who may have varying presentations at different stages of their disease (25, 41). Individuals may respond differently to medications and effects are often subtle and develop insidiously, making it difficult for family, supports, and medical practitioners to assess if the medication is effective (25). This is furthered by that many PLWD, especially within the later disease stages, are unable to express their experiences and self-report medication effects, including ADRs (42). Another aspect to consider is that objective tests to assess the effect of these medications are time consuming to perform. For example, in BPSD, measurements such as the neuropsychiatric index and Cohen-Mansfield agitation index are long and difficult to perform. Quite often for BPSD, these medications are given in a residential aged care setting where you have different staff on who are busy and are unable to give you the time to provide objective responses if there has been a response to medication. Notably, many PLWD discontinue medication due to perceived lack of efficacy and ADRs, further highlighting the individualized factors related to medication tolerance and treatment goals. The importance of a person-centered approach to pharmacological management in dementia care becomes evident, emphasizing the need to tailor medication management to the individual’s treatment goals, considering their unique preferences and values (27, 43).
3.4.1.3 Culture and ethnicity
Three of the identified guidelines explicitly addresses engagement with individuals from different cultural backgrounds (30, 31, 34). Burns et al. considered both culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) peoples (30). CPG also mentions ATSI in their recommendation 14–18 and CALD in their recommendation 19–21 (31). In addition, Belfrage and colleagues developed a guideline regarding cognitive and dementia care for ATSI people attending primary care (34). More comprehensive CALD/ATSI guidelines are in need as cultural-and ethnicity-related factors have been noted to be associated with dementia prevalence, incidence, presentation, understanding, and service utilization (44). Adding to this, medications may interact differently among CALD groups due to genetic variations. Although there is no clear evidence to confirm this in dementia care, around 25% of new medications approved by FDA have different effects across ethnic groups (45). When considering the lack of diverse representation within clinical trials, this poses concerns about the recommendations provided in guidelines. For example, nearly half of all clinical trials in Australia for dementia actively exclude participants non-fluent in English (46). In line with this, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 99 clinical trials for medications to improve cognitive symptoms of dementia found that only 11% of participants were of non-Anglo/Caucasian background (47).
3.4.1.4 Multimorbidity and polypharmacy
None of the identified guidelines offer specific information on managing multimorbidity, resulting in substantial challenges for clinical decision-making. This issue is compounded by the high likelihood of PLWD having multimorbidity and corresponding polypharmacy. The guidelines fail to address practical aspects of medication management, such as how to monitor regular medications or how to balance the risks and benefits of medication use. Relatedly, a recent systematic review noted nonadherence rates in older adults of up to 38% (48). Factors associated with adherence include age, dementia type, medication prescribed, therapy duration, and presence of other concurrent medication and polypharmacy regimens (49) The latter further emphasizes the need for specific consideration for managing multimorbidity and polypharmacy among this population.
3.4.2 Healthcare provider-related
3.4.2.1 Awareness
The initial challenge in appropriate implementation of pharmacological management guidelines is the potential lack of awareness of guideline availability among medical practitioners. Although there is no Australian-specific data to confirm this, a Canadian study found that only half of the participating medical practitioners were aware of available dementia guidelines (50). Practice trends in Australia also allude to the fact that a lack of guideline awareness may be a contributing factor to poor pharmacological management of PLWD. For example, an Australian study indicated that general practitioners (GPs) do not have a protocol for the assessment of dementia and rather have varying practices across services, and within their own practice (51). While this study only involved 30 GPs and was conducted prior to the release of the CPG, it indicates a lack of uniformity within dementia care. A recent Australian longitudinal study further highlighted the lack of awareness of best practice in dementia care (52), where GPs reflected low awareness of the pharmacological management of BPSD and negative effects of long-term anticholinergic agents. This lack of awareness extends globally, as a 2019 survey of over 14,000 health practitioners indicated that approximately 60% held the erroneous belief that dementia is a normal part of aging (53). While this can be attributed, in part, to the broader issue of insufficient dementia-specific training among health practitioners, this shortcoming could be mitigated by referring to the recommendations presented in guidelines. This suggests that practitioners may not be fully aware of the existence or content of these guidelines.
3.4.2.2 Dementia-specific training
It is important to also acknowledge that dementia-specific training for health practitioners is lacking, especially for GPs, resulting in limited knowledge of contemporary approaches to care and best practice. Health practitioners consistently report a lack of training in dementia (52, 54, 55), including its pharmacological management (47, 56). In the Australian longitudinal study mentioned above, mean self-rated scores on a 10-point Likert scale for knowledge of dementia and confidence in treating the condition were just 5.0 and 5.1, respectively (52). This issue is especially pertinent within the Australian healthcare landscape, where GPs often serve as the first and often only health practitioner, especially in regional and remote settings. In these areas, access to dementia specialists, such as geriatricians, neurologists or psychiatrists, is limited, placing a heavier reliance on GPs for dementia care. Efforts have been made in Australia to proactively engage health practitioners with guideline recommendations, yielding some promising results (57). However, the limited uptake of these recommendations continues to underscore the overarching issue: health practitioners often lack awareness of dementia care guidelines and do not consistently implement them in their clinical practice.
3.4.2.3 Resistance
Another theme identified was medical practitioners’ resistance, which can significantly impede the adoption of new guidelines and practices. This resistance may manifest through both overt and subtle actions, ultimately influencing the uptake of guidelines. Within dementia care, one notable aspect of resistance is therapeutic inertia, characterized by the inclination to continue prescribing medications without a thorough review of their net benefit (25). Furthermore, a cognitive shortcut, the availability heuristic, encourages clinicians to persist with medications based on past experiences, even in situations of uncertainty (25). For example, medical practitioners who supported PLWD reported medications have positive clinical effects at least half of the time, even for persistent and challenging symptoms (54). Among the 26 practitioners interviewed, only two described direct experience with possible severe ADRs from a medication (54). The tendency to prioritize personal clinical experiences and rely on this heuristic could significantly hinder the incorporation of guideline recommendations into practice. Drawing from research looking at the use of chemical restraint on people with intellectual disability, a major barrier to reducing incidence was rooted in resistance from medical practitioners (58). This resistance can be attributed to various factors, such as the perceived need to support the carer by continuing to prescribe medication (25, 58). However, interviews conducted in this study clearly highlighted the overt reluctance among practitioners to decrease ‘inappropriate’ medication prescriptions and to engage in consultations with other allied health professionals (58). This is linked to another important aspect contributing to resistance in medical practitioners, that is the fee-for-service health system structure in Australia rewards practitioners only for face-to-face interactions with patients but not for consultations with other health professionals in primary care. The other health professionals are also not rewarded for engaging into these consultations. This aspect is often dismissed or not realized by health service administrators and researchers.
3.4.3 System and supports-related
3.4.3.1 Setting
Dementia care is multifaceted, and its management can significantly differ based on the specific care setting (59). While in theory, the core principles of medical management should remain consistent, real-world practice often reveals distinct variations. For example, research indicates that BPSD increases during acute stays in hospital (60), suggesting that the care environment itself can influence medical decision-making, such as leading to over-reliance on chemical restraints. Accordingly, the practice guidelines provided by The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists note that where required due to risk of harm, doctors should follow the ‘common law principle of necessity’ and can engage in a manner that may not be appropriate in the community, including administration of medication without direct consent (32). Moreover, transitions between care settings can introduce further complexity. For instance, when individuals move from their homes to formal care settings, there is often a notable increase in the number of prescribed medications (61), including antipsychotics and benzodiazepines (62). This transition underscores the impact of environment on medication management decisions, highlighting the need for adaptable guidelines that cater to these variations.
In addition, dementia presents specific concerns in rural and remote regions of Australia, where approximately 30% of the nation’s population resides. Rural and remote areas typically have an older demographic, with two out of every five residents affected by dementia (5, 16). Unlike major cities, these regions face escalating challenges related to diagnostic, medical, specialist, and support services (63). The unique environmental, systemic, and societal factors inherent to regional healthcare systems predispose rural and remote communities to suboptimal healthcare access and capacity, resulting in elevated rates of morbidity, mortality, hospital admissions, and extended hospital stays (64). Furthermore, given that GPs frequently serve as the initial and often sole point of contact in these areas, the barriers associated with GPs, as described above, are exacerbated within rural and remote settings.
The CPG and other identified guidelines aim to provide overarching guidance for all major forms of dementia and care across community, residential care, and acute hospital settings. However, it is apparent that the guidelines lack the specificity required to address the unique considerations associated with different dementia types and care settings. Specifically, the nuanced aspects of care are not clear and specific direction is limited. On a global context, there exists guidelines that target medication management and administration within community and residential care settings (65, 66), albeit not specific to PLWD.
3.4.3.2 Supports
Beyond the setting itself, the level of support available to PLWD significantly impacts their care. In acute hospital settings, health practitioners, particularly nurses, are typically highly skilled and appropriately trained to administer and monitor medications. In such environments, specific clinical guidelines might not be as crucial, given the presence of medical consultants who can provide direct guidance. Contrastingly, care settings like residential aged care facilities or home-based care may require more comprehensive support, including clear and accessible guidelines (25, 67). It is well-recognized that the roles and responsibilities of support professionals have expanded considerably, placing them in critical positions of care for PLWD, yet they often lack the necessary skills and capacity to effectively manage the complex and diverse presentations of dementia (25, 67–70). Limited knowledge of best practice is also notable within informal care roles, where more than 50% of informal carers have the responsibility of managing medications for PLWD (71). Concerningly, studies have found that informal carers may change medication without consultation (68) or forget to obtain medications when required (49). Medication-related errors increase with a greater number of medications, often mediated by comorbidities (68), further highlighting the need for guidelines to address this aspect of dementia care.
4 Discussion
Multimorbidity and polypharmacy requires urgent attention and updated guidelines, which intersects with other critical areas and exacerbates the identified barriers to optimal care. Despite the existence of seven Australian guidelines, their coverage of medications primarily offers a superficial overview of generic ADRs without providing comprehensive support for clinical decision-making. These guidelines fall short of offering essential guidance on how to balance the positive effects of medication against potential ADRs. Notably, none of the identified guidelines offer specific direction on medication management when multimorbidity is present. While general recommendations advise healthcare providers to remain vigilant about contraindications and polypharmacy, specific guidance on how to adjust dosages of concurrently administered medications and how to effectively monitor and report ADRs is conspicuously absent. This lack of guidance is particularly challenging in the context of dementia, as PLWD may have alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, rendering them more susceptible to medication-related harm (72). This concern is magnified by the elevated number of medications simultaneously prescribed to PLWD (19, 73). The CPG, for instance, notes that ‘recommendations regarding the use of pharmacological agents…may not apply to those with pre-existing, comorbid [conditions]’ (31). Other guidelines also highlight the importance of considering coexisting conditions and polypharmacy but lack specificity (36).
Typically, clinical practice guidelines for non-dementia conditions rarely address consideration for PLWD, polypharmacy, or the scarcity of evidence regarding the efficacy of treatments for older adults (74). An Australian review of 17 clinical practice guidelines for chronic conditions found that only nine offered generalized considerations for older adults with comorbid conditions (75), while only one addressed the needs of older adults contending with multimorbidity (75). This limited applicability for individuals diagnosed with multiple health conditions, is congruent with international guidelines (76, 77). Additionally, clinical practice guidelines predominantly underrepresent older adults demographically (78). This lack of specific evidence and guidance regarding the management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy may contribute significantly to the underutilization of guidelines by medical practitioners. Furthermore, for vulnerable patients, such as PLWD, reducing polypharmacy is a key priority worldwide (79). Drugs will be discontinued through deprescribing when they are no longer required or to minimize ADRs, thereby minimizing potential harm (80). In the present review, only one guideline focused on the deprescribing of dementia medication (donepezil and memantine), but there is no deprescribing guidelines regarding multimorbidity in PLWD. Therefore, further tools and resources to guide healthcare professionals for deprescribing are required.
An American study with a limited sample of 21 medical practitioners found that disease-specific clinical practice guidelines addressing dementia management could facilitate optimizing practice and was requested by practitioners (25). Some recent international guidelines, such as those for hypertension (81, 82), advocate for an individualized approach for PLWD, although considerable evidence gaps hinder the implementation of these guidelines by clinicians. For example, there is limited knowledge about the effects of antihypertensives in PLWD and how to facilitate shared decision-making when faced with competing health risks. This is concerning, considering that antihypertensives are the second most used medications in PLWD (18). Nevertheless, this understanding can also serve as a catalyst for future guidelines. While it may not be feasible to provide clinical guidance for all potential comorbidities and concurrent medications, priority should be placed on ensuring that the most common comorbidities and medications are addressed in practice guidelines.
This review is not without limitations. Given the expansive scope of the research question and the complexity of the topic, it was not feasible to encompass all aspects of care and barriers comprehensively. There may be specific barriers that have not been addressed, and it is possible that there are broader sociocultural factors influencing medication treatment (e.g., cultural views on aging and older people). Exploring these macro-level barriers falls beyond the scope of this review but presents an avenue for investigation in future research. Despite these limitations, this review was able to highlight urgent gaps in both research and practice, which can be used to inform future guideline development.
We uncovered seven Australian guidelines that address the pharmacological management of PLWD. However, none of these guidelines encompass the holistic management of medication, particularly concerning multimorbidity and polypharmacy, which may impede the practicality of the guidelines. Consequently, there is a clear need for further research assessing the effects of multiple medications among PLWD. Greater use of epidemiological data about PLWD and multiple comorbidities (83, 84) can inform decisions and identify both common and significant conditions that require specific consideration. This information can be used by working groups to subsequently review current guidelines and develop supporting guidelines for dementia care that address multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Such guidelines are valuable tools for health practitioners, equipping them with the knowledge required to make well-informed decisions concerning medication management. By providing guidance on best practice and recommendations on the use of medications, these guidelines can significantly contribute to the mitigation of the associated risks related to medication use and facilitate more optimal outcomes within this population.
Author contributions
SN: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YP: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. AH: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. ET: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. LJ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. YP received support from the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) Investigator Grant (GNT2007912) and Alzheimer’s Association USA (23AARF-1020292).
Conflict of interest
SN was employed by Possability Group Ltd.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. World Health Organization. (2017). Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017-2025. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-action-plan-on-the-public-health-response-to-dementia-2017---2025 (Accessed Septemper 1, 2023)
2. Wahl, D, Solon-Biet, SM, Cogger, VC, Fontana, L, Simpson, SJ, Le Couteur, DG, et al. Aging, lifestyle and dementia. Neurobiol Dis. (2019) 130:104481. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104481
3. Emmady, PD, Schoo, C, and Tadi, P. Major neurocognitive disorder (dementia). Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls (2024).
4. Alzheimer's Association. 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. (2023) 19:1598–695. doi: 10.1002/alz.13016
5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2023). Dementia in Australia. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/dementia/dementia-in-aus/contents/summary#Common (Accessed September 1, 2023)
6. Brown, L, Hansnata, E, and La, HA. (2017). Australia: Alzheimer’s Australia. Economic cost of dementia in Australia 2016-2056: report prepared for Alzheimer’s Australia. Available at: https://www.dementia.org.au/sites/default/files/NATIONAL/documents/The-economic-cost-of-dementia-in-Australia-2016-to-2056.pdf (Accessed September 2, 2023)
7. van Dyck, CH, Swanson, CJ, Aisen, P, Bateman, RJ, Chen, C, Gee, M, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. (2023) 388:9–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948
8. Budd Haeberlein, S, Aisen, PS, Barkhof, F, Chalkias, S, Chen, T, Cohen, S, et al. Two randomized phase 3 studies of aducanumab in early Alzheimer's disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. (2022) 9:197–210. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2022.30
9. O'Brien, JT, Holmes, C, Jones, M, Jones, R, Livingston, G, McKeith, I, et al. Clinical practice with anti-dementia drugs: a revised (third) consensus statement from the British association for psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol. (2017) 31:147–68. doi: 10.1177/0269881116680924
10. Moyle, W, El Saifi, N, Draper, B, Jones, C, Beattie, E, Shum, D, et al. Pharmacotherapy of persons with dementia in long-term care in Australia: a descriptive audit of central nervous system medications. Curr Drug Saf. (2017) 12:95–102. doi: 10.2174/1574886312666170209113203
11. Deutsch, SI, and Burket, JA. Psychotropic medication use for adults and older adults with intellectual disability; selective review, recommendations and future directions. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2021) 104:110017. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110017
12. Ralph, SJ, and Espinet, AJ. Increased all-cause mortality by antipsychotic drugs: updated review and meta-analysis in dementia and general mental health care. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. (2018) 2:1–26. doi: 10.3233/ADR-170042
13. van der Spek, K, Gerritsen, DL, Smalbrugge, M, Nelissen-Vrancken, MH, Wetzels, RB, Smeets, CH, et al. Only 10% of the psychotropic drug use for neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia is fully appropriate. The PROPER I-study. Int Psychogeriatr. (2016) 28:1589–95. doi: 10.1017/S104161021600082X
14. Cortis, N, Smyth, C, and Katz, I. (2023). Reducing restrictive practices: A review of evidence-based alternatives. Available at: https://disability.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/reducing-restrictive-practices-review-evidence-based-alternatives (Accessed September 2, 2023)
15. Spivakovsky, C. (2012). Restrictive interventions in Victoria's disability sector: Issues for discussion and reform. Available at: https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2012-08/apo-nid31473.pdf (Accessed September 3, 2023)
16. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2023). Older Australians. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australians/contents/demographic-profile (Accessed September 3, 2023)
17. Bunn, F, Burn, AM, Goodman, C, Rait, G, Norton, S, Robinson, L, et al. Comorbidity and dementia: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Med. (2014) 12:192. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0192-4
18. Eshetie, TC, Nguyen, TA, Gillam, MH, and Kalisch Ellett, LM. Medication use for comorbidities in people with Alzheimer's disease: an Australian population-based study. Pharmacotherapy. (2019) 39:1146–56. doi: 10.1002/phar.2341
19. Lau, DT, Mercaldo, ND, Harris, AT, Trittschuh, E, Shega, J, and Weintraub, S. Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use among community-dwelling elders with dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. (2010) 24:56–63. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31819d6ec9
20. Blass, DM, Black, BS, Phillips, H, Finucane, T, Baker, A, Loreck, D, et al. Medication use in nursing home residents with advanced dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2008) 23:490–6. doi: 10.1002/gps.1921
21. Page, AT, Potter, K, Naganathan, V, Hilmer, S, McLachlan, AJ, Lindley, RI, et al. Polypharmacy and medicine regimens in older adults in residential aged care. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2023) 105:104849. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104849
22. Zaidi, AS, Peterson, GM, Bereznicki, LRE, Curtain, CM, and Salahudeen, MS. Ten-year trends in adverse drug reaction-related hospitalizations among people with dementia. Ther Adv Drug Saf. (2022) 13:204209862210807. doi: 10.1177/20420986221080796
23. Roughead, EE, and Semple, SJ. Medication safety in acute care in Australia: where are we now? Part 1: a review of the extent and causes of medication problems 2002-2008. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. (2009) 6:18. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-6-18
24. Ruangritchankul, S, Peel, NM, Hanjani, LS, and Gray, LC. Drug related problems in older adults living with dementia. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0236830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236830
25. Green, AR, Lee, P, Reeve, E, Wolff, JL, Chen, CCG, Kruzan, R, et al. Clinicians' perspectives on barriers and enablers of optimal prescribing in patients with dementia and coexisting conditions. J Am Board Fam Med. (2019) 32:383–91. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180335
26. Tjia, J, Rothman, MR, Kiely, DK, Shaffer, ML, Holmes, HM, Sachs, GA, et al. Daily medication use in nursing home residents with advanced dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2010) 58:880–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02819.x
27. Patel, NK, Masoud, SS, Meyer, K, Davila, AV, Rivette, S, Glassner, AA, et al. Engaging multi-stakeholder perspectives to identify dementia care research priorities. J Patient Rep Outcomes. (2021) 5:46. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00325-x
28. Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (2021). Aged Care Royal Commission final report: Summary. Available at: https://www.royalcommission.gov.au/system/files/2021-03/final-report-executive-summary.pdf (Accessed September 5, 2023)
29. Methley, AM, Campbell, S, Chew-Graham, C, McNally, R, and Cheraghi-Sohi, S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. (2014) 14:579. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
30. Burns, K, Casey, A-N, and Brodaty, H (2023). A clinician’s BPSD guide 2023: Understanding and helping people experiencing changed behaviours and psychological symptoms associated with dementia. Available at: https://d3cmsq2had9zzr.cloudfront.net/sites/cheba2/files/page/BPSD%20GUIDES%202023%20-%20Complete%20Digital%20File%2012-19-2023.pdf (Accessed September 11, 2023)
31. Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration. (2016). Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia. Available at: https://cdpc.sydney.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/CDPC-Dementia-Guidelines_WEB.pdf (Accessed September 11, 2023)
32. The Royal Australian & New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. (2016). Antipsychotic medications as a treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. Available at: https://www.ranzcp.org/clinical-guidelines-publications/clinical-guidelines-publications-library/antipsychotics-and-dementia (Accessed September 11, 2023)
33. Reeve, E, Farrell, B, Thompson, W, Herrmann, N, Sketris, I, Magin, PJ, et al. (2018). Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for deprescribing cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine: Recommendations. Available at: https://cdpc.sydney.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/deprescribing-recommendations.pdf (Accessed September 11, 2023)
34. Belfrage, M, Hughson, J, Douglas, H, and Logiudice, D. (2020). Best-practice guide to cognitive impairment and dementia care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people attending primary care: The University of Melbourne. Available at: https://www.racgp.org.au/FSDEDEV/media/documents/Clinical%20Resources/Guidelines/Best-practice-guide.pdf (Accessed September 11, 2023)
35. Therapeutic Guidelines. (2021). Dementia. Available at: https://www.tg.org.au/ (Accessed September 11, 2023)
36. NSW Ministry of Health. (2022). Assessment and management of behaviours and psychological symptoms associated with dementia (BPSD): a handbook for NSW health clinicians providing services for people experiencing BPSD. Available at: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/mentalhealth/resources/Publications/ass-mgmt-bpsd-handbook-dec-22.pdf (Accessed September 11, 2023)
37. NICE. Dementia: assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and their carers. London: National Institute for Health and care excellence (NICE) (2018).
38. Australian Government. (2021). Dementia, Ageing and Aged Care Mission – Implementation plan: Australian government – Department of Health and Aged Care. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-12/medical-research-future-fund-mrff-dementia-ageing-and-aged-care-mission-implementation-plan-mrff-dementia-ageing-and-aged-care-missi_2.pdf (Accessed September 11, 2023)
39. Therapeutic Guidelines. (2023). Conditions of use and disclaimer. Available at: https://www.tg.org.au/conditions-of-use-and-disclaimer/ (Accessed September 11, 2023)
40. Lagana, V, Bruno, F, Altomari, N, Bruni, G, Smirne, N, Curcio, S, et al. Neuropsychiatric or behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD): focus on prevalence and natural history in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:832199. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.832199
41. Page, AT, Clifford, RM, Potter, K, Seubert, L, McLachlan, AJ, Hill, X, et al. Exploring the enablers and barriers to implementing the medication appropriateness tool for comorbid health conditions during dementia (MATCH-D) criteria in Australia: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. (2017) 7:e017906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017906
42. Suarez-Gonzalez, A, Cassani, A, Gopalan, R, Stott, J, and Savage, S. When it is not primary progressive aphasia: a scoping review of spoken language impairment in other neurodegenerative dementias. Alzheimers Dement. (2021) 7:e12205. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12205
43. McNamara, KP, Breken, BD, Alzubaidi, HT, Bell, JS, Dunbar, JA, Walker, C, et al. Health professional perspectives on the management of multimorbidity and polypharmacy for older patients in Australia. Age Ageing. (2017) 46:291–9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw200
44. Babulal, GM, Quiroz, YT, Albensi, BC, Arenaza-Urquijo, E, Astell, AJ, Babiloni, C, et al. Perspectives on ethnic and racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: update and areas of immediate need. Alzheimers Dement. (2019) 15:292–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.009
45. Ramamoorthy, A, Pacanowski, MA, Bull, J, and Zhang, L. Racial/ethnic differences in drug disposition and response: review of recently approved drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. (2015) 97:263–73. doi: 10.1002/cpt.61
46. Low, LF, Barcenilla-Wong, AL, and Brijnath, B. Including ethnic and cultural diversity in dementia research. Med J Aust. (2019) 211:345–6 e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50353
47. Vyas, MV, Raval, PK, Watt, JA, and Tang-Wai, DF. Representation of ethnic groups in dementia trials: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. (2018) 394:107–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.09.012
48. Smith, D, Lovell, J, Weller, C, Kennedy, B, Winbolt, M, Young, C, et al. A systematic review of medication non-adherence in persons with dementia or cognitive impairment. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0170651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170651
49. El-Saifi, N, Moyle, W, Jones, C, and Tuffaha, H. Medication adherence in older patients with dementia: a systematic literature review. J Pharm Pract. (2018) 31:322–34. doi: 10.1177/0897190017710524
50. Pimlott, NJ, Persaud, M, Drummond, N, Cohen, CA, Silvius, JL, Seigel, K, et al. Family physicians and dementia in Canada: part 2. Understanding the challenges of dementia care. Can Fam Physician. (2009) 55:508–9.
51. Murphy, K, O'Connor, DA, Browning, CJ, French, SD, Michie, S, Francis, JJ, et al. Understanding diagnosis and management of dementia and guideline implementation in general practice: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. (2014) 9:31. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-31
52. Casey, AN, Islam, MM, Schutze, H, Parkinson, A, Yen, L, Shell, A, et al. GP awareness, practice, knowledge and confidence: evaluation of the first nation-wide dementia-focused continuing medical education program in Australia. BMC Fam Pract. (2020) 21:104. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01178-x
53. Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer report 2019: Attitudes to dementia. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International (2019).
54. Kerns, JW, Winter, JD, Winter, KM, Boyd, T, and Etz, RS. Primary care physician perspectives about antipsychotics and other medications for symptoms of dementia. J Am Board Fam Med. (2018) 31:9–21. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170230
55. Mansfield, E, Noble, N, Sanson-Fisher, R, Mazza, D, and Bryant, J. Primary care physicians' perceived barriers to optimal dementia care: a systematic review. Gerontologist. (2019) 59:e697–708. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny067
56. Cross, AJ, Etherton-Beer, CD, Clifford, RM, Potter, K, and Page, AT. Exploring stakeholder roles in medication management for people living with dementia. Res Social Adm Pharm. (2021) 17:707–14. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.006
57. Laver, K, Cations, M, Radisic, G, de la Perrelle, L, Woodman, R, Fitzgerald, JA, et al. Improving adherence to guideline recommendations in dementia care through establishing a quality improvement collaborative of agents of change: an interrupted time series study. Implement Sci Commun. (2020) 1:80. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00073-x
58. Leif, ES, Fox, RA, Subban, P, and Sharma, U. Stakeholders are almost always resistant': Australian behaviour support practitioners' perceptions of the barriers and enablers to reducing restrictive practices. Int J Dev Disabil. (2023) 69:66–82. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2116908
59. Tropea, J, LoGiudice, D, Liew, D, Roberts, C, and Brand, C. Caring for people with dementia in hospital: findings from a survey to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing best practice dementia care. Int Psychogeriatr. (2017) 29:467–74. doi: 10.1017/S104161021600185X
60. Sampson, EL, White, N, Leurent, B, Scott, S, Lord, K, Round, J, et al. Behavioural and psychiatric symptoms in people with dementia admitted to the acute hospital: prospective cohort study. Br J Psychiatry. (2014) 205:189–96. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.130948
61. Harrison, SL, Sluggett, JK, Lang, C, Whitehead, C, Crotty, M, Corlis, M, et al. The dispensing of psychotropic medicines to older people before and after they enter residential aged care. Med J Aust. (2020) 212:309–13. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50501
62. Welberry, HJ, Jorm, LR, Schaffer, AL, Barbieri, S, Hsu, B, Harris, MF, et al. Psychotropic medicine prescribing and polypharmacy for people with dementia entering residential aged care: the influence of changing general practitioners. Med J Aust. (2021) 215:130–6. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51153
63. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Rural and remote populations. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/0c0bc98b-5e4d-4826-af7f-b300731fb447/aihw-aus-221-chapter-5-2.pdf.aspx (Accessed September 23, 2023)
64. Bourke, L, Humphreys, JS, Wakerman, J, and Taylor, J. Understanding rural and remote health: a framework for analysis in Australia. Health Place. (2012) 18:496–503. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.02.009
65. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2014). Managing medicines in care homes [Social care guideline SC1]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/sc1 (Accessed September 23, 2023)
66. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2017). Managing medicines for adults receiving social care in the community [NICE guideline NG67]. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng67 (Accessed September 25, 2023)
67. Maidment, ID, Aston, L, Hilton, A, Iqbal, N, Child, A, and Shaw, R. Role of community pharmacists in the use of antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD): a qualitative study. BMJ Open. (2016) 6:e010278. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010278
68. Gillespie, R, Mullan, J, and Harrison, L. Managing medications: the role of informal caregivers of older adults and people living with dementia. A review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. (2014) 23:3296–308. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12519
69. Polacsek, M, Goh, A, Malta, S, Hallam, B, Gahan, L, Cooper, C, et al. 'I know they are not trained in dementia': addressing the need for specialist dementia training for home care workers. Health Soc Care Community. (2020) 28:475–84. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12880
70. Hrybyk, RL, Frankowski, AC, Nemec, M, and Peeples, AD. "It's a lot!" the universal worker model and dementia care in assisted living. Geriatr Nurs. (2021) 42:233–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.08.006
71. Thorpe, JM, Thorpe, CT, Kennelty, KA, Gellad, WF, and Schulz, R. The impact of family caregivers on potentially inappropriate medication use in noninstitutionalized older adults with dementia. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. (2012) 10:230–41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.05.001
72. Reeve, E, Trenaman, SC, Rockwood, K, and Hilmer, SN. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations in older people with dementia. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. (2017) 13:651–68. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1325873
73. Bezabhe, WM, Radford, J, Salahudeen, MS, Bindoff, I, Ling, T, Gee, P, et al. Ten-year trends in psychotropic prescribing and polypharmacy in Australian general practice patients with and without dementia. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:3389. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103389
74. Boyd, CM, Darer, J, Boult, C, Fried, LP, Boult, L, and Wu, AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. (2005) 294:716–24. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.6.716
75. Vitry, AI, and Zhang, Y. Quality of Australian clinical guidelines and relevance to the care of older people with multiple comorbid conditions. Med J Aust. (2008) 189:360–5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02079.x
76. Fortin, M, Contant, E, Savard, C, Hudon, C, Poitras, ME, and Almirall, J. Canadian guidelines for clinical practice: an analysis of their quality and relevance to the care of adults with comorbidity. BMC Fam Pract. (2011) 12:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-74
77. Lugtenberg, M, Burgers, JS, Clancy, C, Westert, GP, and Schneider, EC. Current guidelines have limited applicability to patients with comorbid conditions: a systematic analysis of evidence-based guidelines. PLoS One. (2011) 6:e25987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025987
78. Cox, L, Kloseck, M, Crilly, R, McWilliam, C, and Diachun, L. Underrepresentation of individuals 80 years of age and older in chronic disease clinical practice guidelines. Can Fam Physician. (2011) 57:e263–9.
79. World Health Organization. (2017). Medication Without Harm. Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/255263/WHO-HIS-SDS-2017.6-eng.pdf?sequence=1#:~:text=The%20goal%20of%20the%20third,to%20weaknesses%20in%20health%20systems (Accessed September 23, 2023)
80. Liacos, M, Page, AT, and Etherton-Beer, C. Deprescribing in older people. Aust Prescr. (2020) 43:114–20. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2020.033
81. Carey, RM, and Whelton, PK. Prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: synopsis of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline. Ann Intern Med. (2018) 168:351–8. doi: 10.7326/M17-3203
82. Mackay, A, Grenfell, L, and Debeljak, J. A new aged care act for Australia? Examining the Royal Commission’s proposal for human rights inclusive legislation. Univ New South Wales Law J. (2023) 46:836. doi: 10.53637/ZMED8094
83. Nguyen, CQN, Ma, L, Low, YLC, Tan, ECK, Fowler, C, Masters, CL, et al. Exploring the link between comorbidities and Alzheimer's dementia in the Australian imaging, Biomarker & Lifestyle (AIBL) study. Alzheimers Dement. (2024) 16:e12593. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12593
84. Ma, L, Tan, ECK, Bush, AI, Masters, CL, Goudey, B, Jin, L, et al. Elucidating the link between anxiety/depression and Alzheimer's dementia in the Australian imaging biomarkers and lifestyle (AIBL). Study J Epidemiol Glob Health. (2024). doi: 10.1007/s44197-024-00266-w Ahead of print
Appendix 1
PICO question
CINHAL searches
EMBASE searches
Guideline/Webpage registry searches
Keywords: dementia, guideline, multimorbidity, pharmacological management, polypharmacy
Citation: Nagar S, Ma L, Pan Y, Huynh ALH, Tan ECK and Jin L (2024) A need to integrate pharmacological management for multimorbidity into dementia guidelines in Australia. Front. Public Health. 12:1425195. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1425195
Edited by:
Maw Pin Tan, University of Malaya, MalaysiaReviewed by:
Constance Constance Dimity Pond, University of Tasmania, AustraliaChaur-Jong Hu, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan
Copyright © 2024 Nagar, Ma, Pan, Huynh, Tan and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yijun Pan, Yijun.Pan@unimelb.edu.au
†These authors share first authorship