![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Public Health , 06 May 2024
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1409963
This article is part of the Research Topic Raising Awareness around Trends in Noncommunicable Diseases and their Risk Factors to Promote Global Prevention and Control View all 8 articles
This article is a correction to:
Hard work, long hours, and Singaporean young adults' health—A qualitative study
A corrigendum on
Hard work, long hours, and Singaporean young adults' health—A qualitative study
by Leu, J., Rebello, S. A., Sargent, G. M., Kelly, M., and Banwell, C. (2023). Front. Public Health 11:1082581. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1082581
In the published article, there were errors in Table 1 as published. The percentage of Indian male participants in the study was displayed as (33.3). The correct percentage is (20.0). The number of male participants who were of normal weight and corresponding percentage was displayed as 8 (53.3). The correct number and percentage is 10 (66.7). The number of male participants who were overweight and corresponding percentage was displayed as 5 (33.3). The correct number and percentage is 3 (20.0). The number of all participants who were of normal weight and corresponding percentage was displayed as 20 (60.6). The correct number and percentage is 22 (66.7). The number of all participants who were overweight and corresponding percentage was displayed as 7 (21.2). The correct number and percentage is 5 (15.2). The percentage of participants who earned 6000-10,000SGD/month was displayed as (18.1). The correct percentage is (18.2). The corrected Table 1 and its caption ‘Sociodemographic information of participants.' appear below.
In the published article, there was an error in the numbers reported in relation to the number of participants who met the physical activity recommendations.
A correction has been made to Results, “I would love to exercise every day, but I can't do it: the influence of work on physical activities”, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated:
Nevertheless, more than half of the participants (66.7%−12 men and 10 women) took part in physical activity at least once in a typical week, although fewer (39.4%−7 men and 6 women) met the recommendation of 150 min of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise or at least 75 min of vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise in a week (55).
The corrected sentence appears below:
The WHO physical activity guidelines recommend per week: 150 min of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise or 75 min of vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise; and muscle strengthening activities on two or more days (55). More than half of the participants (66.7%−12 men and 10 women) took part in recreational physical activity at least once in a typical week. Yet, many participants did not meet the guidelines despite most participants (81.8%−12 men and 15 women) performing moderate or vigorous intensity exercise, largely through incidental activity.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: work time, health practices, diet, physical activity, obesity, health promotion, preventing non-communicable diseases, burden of disease
Citation: Leu J, Rebello SA, Sargent GM, Kelly M and Banwell C (2024) Corrigendum: Hard work, long hours, and Singaporean young adults' health—A qualitative study. Front. Public Health 12:1409963. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1409963
Received: 31 March 2024; Accepted: 25 April 2024;
Published: 06 May 2024.
Approved by:
Harshad Thakur, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, IndiaCopyright © 2024 Leu, Rebello, Sargent, Kelly and Banwell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jodie Leu, Sm9kaWUuTGV1QGFsdW1uaS5hbnUuZWR1LmF1
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.