Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Occupational Health and Safety
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406467
This article is part of the Research Topic From Safety to Sense of Safety View all 14 articles

The Development of the Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue scale

Provisionally accepted
Júlia Halamová Júlia Halamová 1,2*Martin Kanovsky Martin Kanovsky 1,3Katarina Krizova Katarina Krizova 1,2Bronislava Strnádelová Bronislava Strnádelová 1,2Martina Baránková Martina Baránková 1,2Charles Figley Charles Figley 4
  • 1 Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • 2 Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • 3 Institute of Social Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • 4 Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: There is a high probability of compassion fatigue occurring in helping professionals who work with traumatized clients or patients. Several instruments exist for measuring compassion fatigue, but all of them have methodological flaws. The original Compassion Satisfaction/Fatigue Self-Test for Helpers is time-consuming and its psychometric properties, including factor structure, have not been supported in the research.Methods: Therefore, the goal of this study was to apply a Mokken scale analysis for polytomous items to shorten the Compassion Satisfaction/Fatigue Self-Test for Helpers and improve its psychometric properties. In addition, we wanted to create norms for the helping professional population. The research sample consisted of 2320 participants from various helping professions with a mean age of 41.74 years (SD=11.62) ranging from 18 to 76 years. Results: To improve scalability, most of the scale items were removed. The resulting item scalability coefficients ranged from 0.349 to 0.655 and Molenaar-Sijtsma reliability coefficient ranged between .75 and .87. The final revised and shortened Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue scale (CSCFS) consisted of 5 items for the Compassion Satisfaction -Personal Integrity and Happiness subscale, 5 items for the Compassion Satisfaction -Work Competence and Happiness subscale, 9 items for the Compassion Fatigue -Secondary Traumatic Stress subscale, and 7 for the Compassion Fatigue -Burnout subscale. The newly revised subscales have good reliability coefficients.Conclusions: The CSCFS appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue among helping professionals. More research is required to support its factor structure in a range of settings. We recommend testing usability across different helping professions and cultures.

    Keywords: compassion fatigue, Compassion satisfaction, helping professionals, Psychometrics, self-testing

    Received: 25 Mar 2024; Accepted: 09 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Halamová, Kanovsky, Krizova, Strnádelová, Baránková and Figley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Júlia Halamová, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.