Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1404897
This article is part of the Research Topic Cognitive and Mental Health Improvement Under- and Post-COVID-19 View all 36 articles

Disparities and Protective Factors in Pandemic-Related Mental Health Outcomes: A Louisiana-Based Study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Epidemiology Department, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • 2 Biostatistics and Data Science Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • 3 School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Heath Sciences Center, Epidemiology and Population Health Program, New Orleans, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a wide-ranging impact on mental health. Diverse populations experienced the pandemic differently, highlighting pre-existing inequalities and creating new challenges in recovery. Understanding the effects across diverse populations and identifying protective factors is crucial for guiding future pandemic preparedness. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the specific COVID-19-related impacts associated with general well-being, 2) identify protective factors associated with better mental health outcomes, and 3) assess racial disparities in pandemic impact and protective factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Louisiana residents was conducted in summer 2020, yielding a sample of 986 Black and White adults. The exposure was overall pandemic impact, measured using the Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory, and the outcome was general well-being (GWB), measured with the General Well-Being Schedule. Potential protective factors included social support, resilience, and social cohesion. Linear regression models were constructed to examine the association between pandemic impact and GWB, with each protective factor added as an effect modifier. These relationships were further assessed for differences by race. Results: Black persons displayed higher levels of pandemic impact and lower levels of social support, resilience, and social cohesion (p<.0001), and no differences in general-well being compared to White persons. Social support, resilience, and social cohesion were identified as protective factors for both groups (p<.0001, respectively), but these protective effects deteriorated as pandemic impacts increased. The addition of a pandemic impact-race interaction term was also significant in each model (p=0.0020, p<.0001, and p=0.0095, respectively) and showed that the protective effects of social support and resilience deteriorated more rapidly for Black persons than White persons, while the protective effects of social cohesion deteriorated more rapidly for White persons than Black persons. Discussion: This study emphasizes the importance of psychosocial resources in buffering the mental health impact of pandemics, while highlighting greater vulnerability for marginalized communities lacking access to crucial support systems. Findings underscore the need for targeted interventions that bolster access to social support, promote resilience, and strengthen social cohesion, particularly within minority groups. Additionally, policymakers should consider proactive measures to mitigate the disproportionate impact of future crises on vulnerable populations.

    Keywords: Mental Health, COVID-19, social support, resilience, social capital, social cohesion, race

    Received: 21 Mar 2024; Accepted: 29 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Rung, Oral, Prusisz and Peters. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ariane L. Rung, Epidemiology Department, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4355, Nebraska, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.